Jump to content

Sprint Super Bowl Coverage/DAS


Recommended Posts

For Super Bowl 51, John Stevens is the new Sprint President in charge of the Central Texas Region. Jamie Jones is the President of the Sprint South Area.

 

For Super Bowl 52, Michael McMahon is the new Sprint President in charge of the Great Plains Region (North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Minnesota, Iowa):

Kevin Crull is the President of the Sprint Central Area.

 

See Map: http://bizwire.tekgroup.com/media/86/ONE_Sprint_Map_11316_Highres_20160114120501346.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what T-Mobile's Neville Ray had to say about T-Mobile's performance at the Super Bowl.

 

See the chart: Sprint virtually tied for 2nd place with AT&T! Great job Sprint!

I like the part were he says Cheating on the test.

Cheating on the Test

Let’s take a quick moment to look at Sprint’s truly bizarre claim that they actually deliver the fastest LTE network—when every other network benchmark test out there measures Sprint’s network as the slowest. Here’s how Sprint twists data (provided by Nielsen) to make their twisted claim.

 

The fact is, the Nielsen data isn’t actually a measure of network performance at all.

So throttle your most of the stuff your users do except for speed test is not cheating on the speedtest.

 

 

I think the throughput of the networks would be a bigger win if Tmobile was able to do that. Anyone find numbers from Sprint or TMobile.

 

Verizon 7TB https://twitter.com/VerizonNews/status/696551515704709120

ATT 5.2TB https://twitter.com/ATT/status/696565959121903616

 

Both big numbers.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how T-Mobile is trying to discredit Nielsen's results by saying that it's not a measure of network performance and then proceeds to say:

 

Nielsen measures the experience of a small panel of customers based on how those customers choose to use their wireless data.

 

I'm pretty sure that is exactly how you should measure network performance. By looking at how it performs in everyday tasks. At the end of the day T-Mobile can pull 150Mbps theoretically but if that doesn't translate into real world usage, then what is the point?

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three of the Four Major Carriers have released Official Reports on Usage in varying detail:

Hopefully Sprint plans to do the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though VZW is markedly lower than Tmo, AT&T and Sprint, they all were way above acceptable.

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though VZW is markedly lower than Tmo, AT&T and Sprint, they all were way above acceptable.

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

 

Levi's is an outdoor stadium, which had a substantially upgraded DAS, while NRG Stadium in Houston has earned the nickname "No Reception, Guaranteed", even though it has a retractable roof. There's clearly no macro network to fall back on if the DAS isn't up to snuff.

 

Based on those articles, it seems like a lot of work needs to go into that DAS for next February's game.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must of been a pain being on TMo with video being limited to 1.5Mbps. But I'm sure that would help the networks congestion, largely on the upload.

 

Video is only limited if you have "Binge On" switched on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

f00dcabff449f0e8402b6ee5126ec5f6.jpg

Here it is !

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

It's important to keep in mind that these stats were compiled by T-Mobile using Ookla data. They could have easily manipulated the data.

 

Also, I'll say the same thing I did over at Reddit: Where are the measurement uncertainties? Data without uncertainties is useless. This is one reason I have a lot more respect for RootMetrics than other network performance measurements. At least RM uses statistically sound techniques for characterizing network performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what T-Mobile's Neville Ray had to say about T-Mobile's performance at the Super Bowl.

 

See the chart: Sprint virtually tied for 2nd place with AT&T! Great job Sprint!

So let me get this straight. He is basically discrediting the time honored tradition of using sample of the population? Is that not what eveybody else from ookla to rootmetrics does?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You noticed how AT&T and Verizon threw out hard numbers in there report of how much data passed thru there systems Verizon with 68tb, AT&T with 28tb, and t-mobile saying how many snapchats went thru there network at the time. I wonder

 

Sent from my LGLS996 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You noticed how AT&T and Verizon threw out hard numbers in there report of how much data passed thru there systems Verizon with 68tb, AT&T with 28tb, and t-mobile saying how many snapchats went thru there network at the time. I wonder

 

Sent from my LGLS996 using Tapatalk

http://www.tmonews.com/2016/02/t-mobile-reports-super-bowl-50-network-stats/

 

2.1 TB according to this article

 

Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.tmonews.com/2016/02/t-mobile-reports-super-bowl-50-network-stats/

 

2.1 TB according to this article

 

Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk

So basically 2,000 people out of 84,000 were t-mobile subs if you go buy each one using about a gb of data, which means not that many.

 

Sent from my LGLS996 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically 2,000 people out of 84,000 were t-mobile subs if you go buy each one using about a gb of data, which means not that many.

 

Sent from my LGLS996 using Tapatalk

Ya Verizon used 7 TB and AT&T had 5.2 TB but that's cuz the lions share of people there were on the big 2. Still waiting on Sprint numbers though

 

Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk

Edited by Camcroz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.tmonews.com/2016/02/t-mobile-reports-super-bowl-50-network-stats/

 

2.1 TB according to this article

 

Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk

so it stands to reason that t mobile had the highest speeds, as they handled the least amount of data (excluding sprint as they have not said).  from the reports it looks like all 4 carries provided usable service that was able to provide 1080P streaming video... but really your at the super bowl, you shouldn't need to stream anything on your phone, nice to see people had the option to though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so it stands to reason that t mobile had the highest speeds, as they handled the least amount of data (excluding sprint as they have not said).  from the reports it looks like all 4 carries provided usable service that was able to provide 1080P streaming video... but really your at the super bowl, you shouldn't need to stream anything on your phone, nice to see people had the option to though. 

 

 

*Not quite.  On T-Mobile by default you have to go into your account settings and make changes if you want to watch 1080p video. It doesn't matter what the speedtests show.

 

I'm just pointing out BingeOn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Not quite. On T-Mobile by default you have to go into your account settings and make changes if you want to watch 1080p video. It doesn't matter what the speedtests show.

 

I'm just pointing out BingeOn.

good point I should have clarified, all carriers had the capability to stream 1080P provided proper set up. The point was all carriers provided enough bandwidth to carry out all reasonable tasks one could perform on a smart phone. [emoji12]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint said that its customers used about 1.6 terabytes of data in and around the stadium on game day, and that the distributed antenna system in the stadium saw a 150% increase in use compared to last year’s Super Bowl at University of Phoenix stadium. Traffic around Levi’s Stadium was 93% higher than outside last year’s Super Bowl, and Sprint added that “the biggest spikes in network traffic occurred just after the opening ceremony and immediately following the half time show.”

 

http://www.rcrwireless.com/20160209/network-infrastructure/lte/super-bowl-gives-public-safety-glimpse-of-firstnet-tag6

 

1.6Tb looks to be the total according to RCR.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Still hoping Sprint actually releases an infographic like AT&T/Verizon/T-Mobile have done, but at this point, I'm doubting it will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably not, seems like they had the least amount of data usage. Why would they want to highlight that fact?

So. Cal isn't an ideal market for sprint, I wonder when the game is held in different parts of the country there is more usage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably not, seems like they had the least amount of data usage. Why would they want to highlight that fact?

So. Cal isn't an ideal market for sprint, I wonder when the game is held in different parts of the country there is more usage.

 

Sprint published an infographic for the 2015 Super Bowl. See here.

 

See this FierceWireless Article. (The original link to Sprint's infographic from this article no longer works)

 

The game was held in Santa Clara, CA. That's not So. Cal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...