Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Shentel Market (Shenandoah Valley/Hagerstown/Harrisburg)


Boosted20V

Recommended Posts

That does not sound right. nTelos should not have native Sprint coverage in Winchester. Are you sure you are not just switching between two sectors on the Shentel site? Does "Signal Check" show you the nTelos carrier info?? If you do not see the ntelos Sid, you probably are not on the nTelos network in Winchester. Go to the site and do a 360 degree run around the site. Identify the 3 sectors and then see what you get at home. you should see SID of 4195 and 3 different BID's. The NID will probably stay on 8 if you stay on Shentel.

It switches between 4195, 22435, and 4379.

6uguqu2u.jpg

 

Sent from my HTC ONE M8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It switches between 4195, 22435, and 4379.

 

 

Sent from my HTC ONE M8

The first one is 1900 CDMA 1x provided by Shentel for Sprint.  The second one is 800 CDMA 1x provided by Shentel for Sprint.   The 4379 is nTelos for sure.  I just looked at the latest PRL to see what the priorities are.    All 3 of them are equal priority and that completely shocked me.  I was very very surprised to see a nTelos SID that could be accessed in Winchester and be treated as Sprint Native service.  I did notice that it appears to be using nTelos Spectrum and not normal Sprint channels.

Some time ago, the ntelos SID was a secondary priority and you never got on the nTelos sites unless the Shentel sites were down.  And it showed the roaming indicator. 

This really shocks me,  I never dreamed that the nTelos SID was of equal priority in the PRL. I would think that Shentel may not like this and it may even be causing issues if you can access the nTelos network and not be roaming in Winchester. Maybe Shentels agreement does not have exclusivity, but I thought it did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first one is 1900 CDMA 1x provided by Shentel for Sprint. The second one is 800 CDMA 1x provided by Shentel for Sprint. The 4379 is nTelos for sure. I just looked at the latest PRL to see what the priorities are. All 3 of them are equal priority and that completely shocked me. I was very very surprised to see a nTelos SID that could be accessed in Winchester and be treated as Sprint Native service. I did notice that it appears to be using nTelos Spectrum and not normal Sprint channels.

Some time ago, the ntelos SID was a secondary priority and you never got on the nTelos sites unless the Shentel sites were down. And it showed the roaming indicator.

This really shocks me, I never dreamed that the nTelos SID was of equal priority in the PRL. I would think that Shentel may not like this and it may even be causing issues if you can access the nTelos network and not be roaming in Winchester. Maybe Shentels agreement does not have exclusivity, but I thought it did.

I knew what the SIDs were. My guess is something to do with the CCA. My m7 showed the roaming indicator whenever I force roamed. I've only seen the roaming indicator on my m8 once the other day when I was in Sterling and it went on Verizon.

 

Sent from my HTC ONE M8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well just like I thought, things were overloaded, but shentel is getting the upgrades and capacity out there, I'm slowly getting back up to the 20+Mbps speeds I was seeing when lte first launched, good things are still coming, I feel like some of you guys need to relax before lashing out when someone says something about the speeds getting really slow compared to what they used to be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well just like I thought, things were overloaded, but shentel is getting the upgrades and capacity out there, I'm slowly getting back up to the 20+Mbps speeds I was seeing when lte first launched, good things are still coming, I feel like some of you guys need to relax before lashing out when someone says something about the speeds getting really slow compared to what they used to be

No one lashed out at anyone. Facts were presented. That is all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I just picked up B26 from a tower that didn't even have 1x800 a couple weeks ago in the Quicksburg / New Market area. Keep the upgrades coming. :-)

 

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Band 26 live in Harrisburg on Grayson road

Thanks for the heads-up! I'll have to re-activate my LG G2 and check things out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.nvdaily.com/news/2014/06/county-oks-new-shentel-tower.php

 

Shentel is replacing the tower at 1503 Cottontown Road. The old one couldn't hold any more equipment.

This might explain why there's been no 800 (1x or LTE) on the existing tower. I'm guessing they just did a GMO build on it until they got permission to build the new monopole. This is in my county so I'll try to keep an eye on it and post back when it's done.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a lot of people know this but I used to work for shentel and during conversation... 800 is coming now and are in talks about expanding b41. I was told as well if the T-Mobile merger went through its as easy as adding it via computer.

 

Shentel is VERY dedicated to its network, but that's why they are very successful

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a lot of people know this but I used to work for shentel and during conversation... 800 is coming now and are in talks about expanding b41. I was told as well if the T-Mobile merger went through its as easy as adding it via computer.

 

Shentel is VERY dedicated to its network, but that's why they are very successful

Johnathan,

Most of your post is absolutely true.  But the comment about adding T-mobile being easy to add via computer is arguable.

It just is not going to be that easy. If they trash the old t-mobile network completely and just give them CDMA phones, it might be easy, but I doubt that it would go down that way.   There will be some havoc, we just do not know exactly where or what it will be yet.

 

One thing for sure, in the Shentel footprint, the T-mobile customers would get  a tremendous boost in coverage and overall cell service that was much much better. Shentel has almost 100% of their footprint covered with excellent voice and LTE coverage.   T-Mobile has horrible service in the same area.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man I have not been paying much attention to this thread lately. I had no idea B26 LTE was starting to pop up in Harrisburg. I was just at Dockside Willies a couple hours ago but I didn't even think to check if I could get B26.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed on B26 finally being rolled out in Harrisburg. My house in Lower Paxton has it and now my work off of Progress Ave. has it as well. I'd say the coverage is similar to 1x1900 for sure. Much improved in building coverage compared to B25.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed on B26 finally being rolled out in Harrisburg. My house in Lower Paxton has it and now my work off of Progress Ave. has it as well. I'd say the coverage is similar to 1x1900 for sure. Much improved in building coverage compared to B25.

Have you checked any signal levels while on band 26 vs what you used to get on band 25? I live in Swatara Township and am wondering whether or not it is worth it for me to re-activate my LG G2 (a phone I totally hate). If the in-building performance is really significantly better I would try it, otherwise I'll just wait until the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 is released on Sprint before I switch back to a Tri Band device.

 

Thanks for any input!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you checked any signal levels while on band 26 vs what you used to get on band 25? I live in Swatara Township and am wondering whether or not it is worth it for me to re-activate my LG G2 (a phone I totally hate). If the in-building performance is really significantly better I would try it, otherwise I'll just wait until the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 is released on Sprint before I switch back to a Tri Band device.

 

Thanks for any input!

 

You hate the G2? I'll take it! Haha. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You hate the G2? I'll take it! Haha.

 

I know this is not the thread for this, but.... My G2 is not a very good performer. The RF performance is somewhat deaf, the GPS sensitivity is poor and worst of all I hate the sound quality in the earpiece, not to mention the speaker. My Samsung GN3, really outperforms the G2 by leaps and bounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this is not the thread for this, but.... My G2 is not a very good performer. The RF performance is somewhat deaf, the GPS sensitivity is poor and worst of all I hate the sound quality in the earpiece, not to mention the speaker. My Samsung GN3, really outperforms the G2 by leaps and bounds.

 

I agree on the speaker/earpiece being awful on the G2. And the LTE radio isn't anything special however the B26 connectivity is much improved. If I went into any kind of structure that wasn't directly next to a tower previously I'd get no LTE. Now, unless I'm deep in a building it holds onto LTE very well. Might want to give it a shot.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree on the speaker/earpiece being awful on the G2. And the LTE radio isn't anything special however the B26 connectivity is much improved. If I went into any kind of structure that wasn't directly next to a tower previously I'd get no LTE. Now, unless I'm deep in a building it holds onto LTE very well. Might want to give it a shot.

Thank you very much for the input. That's really encouraging! I'm glad to see Shentel is providing us with such great service.

 

I'll have to give it a shot just to test the waters. But the G2 won't be my permanent Tri Band device.

 

Thanks again for taking the time to post! Most appreciated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...