Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Shentel Market (Shenandoah Valley/Hagerstown/Harrisburg)


Boosted20V

Recommended Posts

That does not sound right. nTelos should not have native Sprint coverage in Winchester. Are you sure you are not just switching between two sectors on the Shentel site? Does "Signal Check" show you the nTelos carrier info?? If you do not see the ntelos Sid, you probably are not on the nTelos network in Winchester. Go to the site and do a 360 degree run around the site. Identify the 3 sectors and then see what you get at home. you should see SID of 4195 and 3 different BID's. The NID will probably stay on 8 if you stay on Shentel.

It switches between 4195, 22435, and 4379.

6uguqu2u.jpg

 

Sent from my HTC ONE M8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It switches between 4195, 22435, and 4379.

 

 

Sent from my HTC ONE M8

The first one is 1900 CDMA 1x provided by Shentel for Sprint.  The second one is 800 CDMA 1x provided by Shentel for Sprint.   The 4379 is nTelos for sure.  I just looked at the latest PRL to see what the priorities are.    All 3 of them are equal priority and that completely shocked me.  I was very very surprised to see a nTelos SID that could be accessed in Winchester and be treated as Sprint Native service.  I did notice that it appears to be using nTelos Spectrum and not normal Sprint channels.

Some time ago, the ntelos SID was a secondary priority and you never got on the nTelos sites unless the Shentel sites were down.  And it showed the roaming indicator. 

This really shocks me,  I never dreamed that the nTelos SID was of equal priority in the PRL. I would think that Shentel may not like this and it may even be causing issues if you can access the nTelos network and not be roaming in Winchester. Maybe Shentels agreement does not have exclusivity, but I thought it did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first one is 1900 CDMA 1x provided by Shentel for Sprint. The second one is 800 CDMA 1x provided by Shentel for Sprint. The 4379 is nTelos for sure. I just looked at the latest PRL to see what the priorities are. All 3 of them are equal priority and that completely shocked me. I was very very surprised to see a nTelos SID that could be accessed in Winchester and be treated as Sprint Native service. I did notice that it appears to be using nTelos Spectrum and not normal Sprint channels.

Some time ago, the ntelos SID was a secondary priority and you never got on the nTelos sites unless the Shentel sites were down. And it showed the roaming indicator.

This really shocks me, I never dreamed that the nTelos SID was of equal priority in the PRL. I would think that Shentel may not like this and it may even be causing issues if you can access the nTelos network and not be roaming in Winchester. Maybe Shentels agreement does not have exclusivity, but I thought it did.

I knew what the SIDs were. My guess is something to do with the CCA. My m7 showed the roaming indicator whenever I force roamed. I've only seen the roaming indicator on my m8 once the other day when I was in Sterling and it went on Verizon.

 

Sent from my HTC ONE M8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well just like I thought, things were overloaded, but shentel is getting the upgrades and capacity out there, I'm slowly getting back up to the 20+Mbps speeds I was seeing when lte first launched, good things are still coming, I feel like some of you guys need to relax before lashing out when someone says something about the speeds getting really slow compared to what they used to be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well just like I thought, things were overloaded, but shentel is getting the upgrades and capacity out there, I'm slowly getting back up to the 20+Mbps speeds I was seeing when lte first launched, good things are still coming, I feel like some of you guys need to relax before lashing out when someone says something about the speeds getting really slow compared to what they used to be

No one lashed out at anyone. Facts were presented. That is all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I just picked up B26 from a tower that didn't even have 1x800 a couple weeks ago in the Quicksburg / New Market area. Keep the upgrades coming. :-)

 

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Band 26 live in Harrisburg on Grayson road

Thanks for the heads-up! I'll have to re-activate my LG G2 and check things out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.nvdaily.com/news/2014/06/county-oks-new-shentel-tower.php

 

Shentel is replacing the tower at 1503 Cottontown Road. The old one couldn't hold any more equipment.

This might explain why there's been no 800 (1x or LTE) on the existing tower. I'm guessing they just did a GMO build on it until they got permission to build the new monopole. This is in my county so I'll try to keep an eye on it and post back when it's done.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a lot of people know this but I used to work for shentel and during conversation... 800 is coming now and are in talks about expanding b41. I was told as well if the T-Mobile merger went through its as easy as adding it via computer.

 

Shentel is VERY dedicated to its network, but that's why they are very successful

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a lot of people know this but I used to work for shentel and during conversation... 800 is coming now and are in talks about expanding b41. I was told as well if the T-Mobile merger went through its as easy as adding it via computer.

 

Shentel is VERY dedicated to its network, but that's why they are very successful

Johnathan,

Most of your post is absolutely true.  But the comment about adding T-mobile being easy to add via computer is arguable.

It just is not going to be that easy. If they trash the old t-mobile network completely and just give them CDMA phones, it might be easy, but I doubt that it would go down that way.   There will be some havoc, we just do not know exactly where or what it will be yet.

 

One thing for sure, in the Shentel footprint, the T-mobile customers would get  a tremendous boost in coverage and overall cell service that was much much better. Shentel has almost 100% of their footprint covered with excellent voice and LTE coverage.   T-Mobile has horrible service in the same area.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man I have not been paying much attention to this thread lately. I had no idea B26 LTE was starting to pop up in Harrisburg. I was just at Dockside Willies a couple hours ago but I didn't even think to check if I could get B26.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed on B26 finally being rolled out in Harrisburg. My house in Lower Paxton has it and now my work off of Progress Ave. has it as well. I'd say the coverage is similar to 1x1900 for sure. Much improved in building coverage compared to B25.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed on B26 finally being rolled out in Harrisburg. My house in Lower Paxton has it and now my work off of Progress Ave. has it as well. I'd say the coverage is similar to 1x1900 for sure. Much improved in building coverage compared to B25.

Have you checked any signal levels while on band 26 vs what you used to get on band 25? I live in Swatara Township and am wondering whether or not it is worth it for me to re-activate my LG G2 (a phone I totally hate). If the in-building performance is really significantly better I would try it, otherwise I'll just wait until the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 is released on Sprint before I switch back to a Tri Band device.

 

Thanks for any input!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you checked any signal levels while on band 26 vs what you used to get on band 25? I live in Swatara Township and am wondering whether or not it is worth it for me to re-activate my LG G2 (a phone I totally hate). If the in-building performance is really significantly better I would try it, otherwise I'll just wait until the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 is released on Sprint before I switch back to a Tri Band device.

 

Thanks for any input!

 

You hate the G2? I'll take it! Haha. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You hate the G2? I'll take it! Haha.

 

I know this is not the thread for this, but.... My G2 is not a very good performer. The RF performance is somewhat deaf, the GPS sensitivity is poor and worst of all I hate the sound quality in the earpiece, not to mention the speaker. My Samsung GN3, really outperforms the G2 by leaps and bounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this is not the thread for this, but.... My G2 is not a very good performer. The RF performance is somewhat deaf, the GPS sensitivity is poor and worst of all I hate the sound quality in the earpiece, not to mention the speaker. My Samsung GN3, really outperforms the G2 by leaps and bounds.

 

I agree on the speaker/earpiece being awful on the G2. And the LTE radio isn't anything special however the B26 connectivity is much improved. If I went into any kind of structure that wasn't directly next to a tower previously I'd get no LTE. Now, unless I'm deep in a building it holds onto LTE very well. Might want to give it a shot.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree on the speaker/earpiece being awful on the G2. And the LTE radio isn't anything special however the B26 connectivity is much improved. If I went into any kind of structure that wasn't directly next to a tower previously I'd get no LTE. Now, unless I'm deep in a building it holds onto LTE very well. Might want to give it a shot.

Thank you very much for the input. That's really encouraging! I'm glad to see Shentel is providing us with such great service.

 

I'll have to give it a shot just to test the waters. But the G2 won't be my permanent Tri Band device.

 

Thanks again for taking the time to post! Most appreciated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...