Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts

On 10/18/2022 at 12:07 PM, jreuschl said:

T-Mobile is still very strict on roaming areas, correct?  There were a couple of times on a trip last week that I had to rely on my wife's phone on AT&T because I was not getting any data roaming (and it is set to on).

I know in the past T-Mobile blocked roaming in areas it "thinks" it has coverage.

Probably won't be adding her to my plan for the time being :(

They are quite strict, restricting usage on a LAC by LAC basis. I've seen the buildout plans for Wisconsin and Illinois so you may be able to add her in the future. :)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, the_intern said:

They are quite strict, restricting usage on a LAC by LAC basis. I've seen the buildout plans for Wisconsin and Illinois so you may be able to add her in the future. :)

What are you seeing for Nebraska :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On this latest coverage map update, we have 5 new expansion sites in Nebraska! (6 if you count the one I missed last time). This expands T-Mobiles coverage across central and northeastern Nebraska beyond the old Sprint footprint. We also have 4 new Sprint conversion now on the map. (There are actually at least 3 more conversion we know about that are not yet on the map).

zowsTQM.png

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, the_intern said:

Unfortunately I didn't see a map for Nebraska like I did for WI & IL, but I was told that the plan is to overbuild Viaero and USCC across the state. 

Meaning let the other guys build out and T-Mo will just continue to roam on them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I received constant text messages to switch to the T-Mobile SIM last November which I did.  I also replaced two phones that were not supported by T-Mobile.  Here I am almost one year later still on the Sprint billing system patiently waiting.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, BucketHead25 said:

I received constant text messages to switch to the T-Mobile SIM last November which I did.  I also replaced two phones that were not supported by T-Mobile.  Here I am almost one year later still on the Sprint billing system patiently waiting.

Same here.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Trip said:

Same here, though I got all new phones back in May or June.  I didn't think Unlimited Freedom was a particularly rare or old plan, either. 

- Trip

We're on the Unlimited Freedom Tax Inclusive v8 plan here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deliberately switched to the Sprint Max hoping to get moved quicker - no such luck.  I have found I can pay off phones to get them unlocked and then the monthly amount is converted to a credit.  Been told if I buy a replacement phone from T-Mobile I will lose that credit, so bought my last phone from Best Buy (factory unlocked).

Edited by dkyeager
Primary reason was for high priority related to work.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, dkyeager said:

Deliberately switched to the Sprint Max hoping to get moved quicker - no such luck.  I have found I can pay off phones to get them unlocked and then the monthly amount is converted to a credit.  Been told if I buy a replacement phone from T-Mobile I will lose that credit, so bought my last phone from Best Buy (factory unlocked).

Our family plan is on Sprint Max too. Still waiting for the billing switch as well. There are some parts of the Sprint website which look absolutely prehistoric, and it's clear they're just running them as a virtual window inside the current site.

At least the Max plan features are great for traveling in the meantime. Didn't know that about the credit. Interesting.

I do miss iPhone Forever and how easy it was to do. I guess "Forever" doesn't mean what it used to anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some impressive numbers.

  • Postpaid net account additions of 394 thousand, best in industry and highest in company history
  • Postpaid net customer additions of 1.6 million, more than AT&T and Verizon combined
  • Postpaid phone net customer additions of 854 thousand, best in industry and highest since merger
  • Postpaid phone churn of 0.88%, only operator to improve year-over-year
  • High Speed Internet net customer additions of 578 thousand, best in industry for fourth consecutive quarter
  • Ultra Capacity 5G covers 250 million people, as many as Verizon plans to cover more than two years from now
  • Raising merger synergies guidance range to $5.7 billion to $5.8 billion in 2022
    • (The network decommissioning is substantially complete, less than 2.5 years post-merger closing, and more than a year ahead of the original merger plan.)

Look at the Ookla, OpenSignal and umlaut results as well. Incredible.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RedSpark said:

Some impressive numbers.

  • Postpaid net account additions of 394 thousand, best in industry and highest in company history
  • Postpaid net customer additions of 1.6 million, more than AT&T and Verizon combined
  • Postpaid phone net customer additions of 854 thousand, best in industry and highest since merger
  • Postpaid phone churn of 0.88%, only operator to improve year-over-year
  • High Speed Internet net customer additions of 578 thousand, best in industry for fourth consecutive quarter
  • Ultra Capacity 5G covers 250 million people, as many as Verizon plans to cover more than two years from now
  • Raising merger synergies guidance range to $5.7 billion to $5.8 billion in 2022
    • (The network decommissioning is substantially complete, less than 2.5 years post-merger closing, and more than a year ahead of the original merger plan.)

Look at the Ookla, OpenSignal and umlaut results as well. Incredible.

IMO they held their network cards close and did not share many details in their conference call.  Sprint core is  gone, vast majority of Sprint keep sites now converted.  Push on VoNR issues and will add markets. B41 whitespace will be a "flip of the switch" at 14,000 sites.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, dkyeager said:

IMO they held their network cards close and did not share many details in their conference call.  Sprint core is  gone, vast majority of Sprint keep sites now converted.  Push on VoNR issues and will add markets. B41 whitespace will be a "flip of the switch" at 14,000 sites.

That's interesting. I haven't had a chance to listen to the call yet.

Q3 2022 Investor Factbook: https://s29.q4cdn.com/310188824/files/doc_financials/2022/q3/TMUS-09_30_2022-EX-99.2-vFinal.pdf

Page 14: Sites (Combined LTE + 5G) 79K Macro Cell Sites, 38K Small cell/distributed antenna systems sites. 

Edited by RedSpark
Spelling
  • Like 2
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, RedSpark said:

That's interesting. I haven't had a chance to listen to the call yet.

Q3 2022 Investor Factbook: https://s29.q4cdn.com/310188824/files/doc_financials/2022/q3/TMUS-09_30_2022-EX-99.2-vFinal.pdf

Page 14: Sites (Combined LTE + 5G) 79K Macro Cell Cites, 38K Small cell/distributed antenna systems sites. 

I missed the site count.  Did not expect it until the end of the year.  Some of my calculations based only on public sources should almost match that number, but choose to add 10k in rural sites for 88k estimate for the end of the year.  On 12/31 last year they had 102k macro sites, so 23k sites were dropped since then.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, dkyeager said:

IMO they held their network cards close and did not share many details in their conference call.  Sprint core is  gone, vast majority of Sprint keep sites now converted.

Omaha, a city @Dkoellerwx and I track fairly closely, must be significantly lagging then.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, dkyeager said:

Srint core is  gone, vast majority of Sprint keep sites now converted.

Roughly half, maybe as much as 2/3rds, of the permitted retain sites have actually been converted in the Omaha/Lincoln market area. Those that haven't are still broadcasting 10Mhz of Sprint B2/25.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of Nebraska... latest coverage map shows 6 brand new expansion sites in central and southwest Nebraska, plus 3 more conversions. They seem to be rushing the rural coverage for some reason rather than finishing up the conversions where capacity is already starting to get strained, or helping roaming hits by covering I-80.

honhZao.png

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dkoellerwx said:

They seem to be rushing the rural coverage for some reason rather than finishing up the conversions where capacity is already starting to get strained, or helping roaming hits by covering I-80.

It honestly seems like a giant vanity exercise right now to fill in a gaping hole in their coverage map, one that had existed for various (may legitimate) reasons.

Screenshot-2021-09-22-074941.jpg

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, dkyeager said:

I missed the site count.  Did not expect it until the end of the year.  Some of my calculations based only on public sources should almost match that number, but choose to add 10k in rural sites for 88k estimate for the end of the year.  On 12/31 last year they had 102k macro sites, so 23k sites were dropped since then.

Looking at the Q2 2022 Investor Factbook for comparison: https://s29.q4cdn.com/310188824/files/doc_financials/2022/q2/Q2-2022-Investor-Factbook-vFinal.pdf

Page 14: Sites (Combined LTE + 5G) 88K Macro Cell Sites, 39K Small cell/distributed antenna systems sites.

The Q3 2022 Factbook figures show a drop-off of 9K Macro Sites and 1K Small cell/distributed antenna systems sites vs the prior quarter.

Extended Range 5G percentage is unchanged (97% of Americans) on the Q3 2022 Factbook vs the prior quarter. Interestingly, POPs isn’t mentioned here like it was in the prior quarter Factbook. (320M)

Ultra Capacity 5G POPs is up to 250M on the Q3 2022 Factbook vs the prior quarter, an increase of 15M POPs.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Dkoellerwx said:

They seem to be rushing the rural coverage for some reason rather than finishing up the conversions where capacity is already starting to get strained, or helping roaming hits by covering I-80.

honhZao.png

Perhaps this is because Verizon has behaved the same way with c-band. Initially it was great coverage in cornfields. Reminded me of Sprint. Of course many rural sites don't need permits or have minimal requirements.

The one theme that seamed to permeate the conference call was competition with Verizon.

My home site, which was converted to T-Mobile 18 months ago but never turned on (Sprint cabinet was placed on a pallet has run b25 since then) is now being converted. Might even have the antennas replaced. Meanwhile the site has gone from first in the area at 100Mbps under Sprint to mostly about 60Mbps. Now up to 90mbps as an near by Sprint site that was off was converted.

AT&T surpassed it thus summer.  Verizon easily surpassed it this month with c-band.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any discussion of churn should include this footnote: "Customers impacted by the decommissioning of the legacy Sprint CDMA and LTE and T-Mobile UMTS networks have been excluded from our customer base resulting in the removal of 212,000 postpaid phone customers and 349,000 postpaid other customers in the first quarter of 2022 and 284,000 postpaid phone customers, 946,000 postpaid other customers and 28,000 prepaid customers in the second quarter of 2022. In connection with our acquisition of companies, we included a base adjustment in the first quarter of 2022 to increase postpaid phone customers by 17,000 and reduce postpaid other customers by 14,000. Certain customers now serviced through reseller contracts were removed from our reported postpaid customer base resulting in the removal of 42,000 postpaid phone customers and 20,000 postpaid other customers in the second quarter of 2022.", page 2, https://s29.q4cdn.com/310188824/files/doc_financials/2022/q3/TMUS-09_30_2022-EX-99.1-vFinal.pdf

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other quirky items:

Higher realized Merger synergies

Gains from the sale of IP addresses

In changes in operating assets and liabilities: Equipment installment plan receivables have declined from (530) to (77) for this quarter last year to current quarter, thus more stable

Change in inventories: 41 to (7)

(1) Customers impacted by the decommissioning of the legacy Sprint CDMA and LTE and T-Mobile UMTS networks have been excluded from our postpaid account base resulting in the removal of 57,000 postpaid accounts in the first quarter of 2022 and 69,000 postpaid accounts in the second quarter of 2022.

 

 

The elephant in the room is DT taking a much more active role.  The FCC license structure is being realigned to recognize this.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...