Jump to content

Sprint Roaming+ - Coverage Map Update


clbowens

Recommended Posts

So I have a question about roaming plus. I'm out visiting family in Smith Center Kansas. I know this is a lte romaing + area that has nextech. What is weird is my nexus 6 and my sisters nexus 5x are only using evdo while my mother's iPhone 6 plus has extended LTE. Does anyone here know why that is and is there a fix?

Just out of curiosity what carrier settings does your mother have on her iPhone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roaming is set to voice only. Data roaming is off and international CDMA is on. Very interesting because she has data.

 

Because it is LTE Roaming+, the data roaming setting should not need to be enabled to access it.

 

I would be curious, though, to see what MCC-MNC and band Nex-Tech is using.  It could be dual broadcasting a Sprint MCC-MNC and using MFBI.  Unfortunately, your mother has an iPhone and gathering that info is not as easy as opening SignalCheck Pro.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it is LTE Roaming+, the data roaming setting should not need to be enabled to access it.

 

I would be curious, though, to see what MCC-MNC and band Nex-Tech is using.  It could be dual broadcasting a Sprint MCC-MNC and using MFBI.  Unfortunately, your mother has an iPhone and gathering that info is not as easy as opening SignalCheck Pro.

 

AJ

 

That is really interesting. I didn't realize it would be handled separately like that. Sadly I don't have any more Sprint phones available to test.

 

So do you think enabling band 12 on my nexus 6 would have a chance of working?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is really interesting. I didn't realize it would be handled separately like that. Sadly I don't have any more Sprint phones available to test.

 

So do you think enabling band 12 on my nexus 6 would have a chance of working?

Well it can't hurt. And probably yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So do you think enabling band 12 on my nexus 6 would have a chance of working?

 

Your mother has an iPhone 6 Plus?  It does not support band 12.  This is not band 12.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God observation AJ.

 

Yes, I am an S4GRU god.  Thank you for acknowledging my deity.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any rumors of Sprint buying out US Cellular? That will help a lot in the Midwest.

It would help a lot in a lot of places, but as far as we know the owners of US Cellular are not willing to sell the company. Such a merger is discussed frequently here because USCC is a good fit for Sprint from an asset and footprint standpoint, but it looks like USCC is content to be an independent roaming partner for the foreseeable future.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would make plenty of sense, Sprint was also considering Alltel in 2004 instead they went for Sextel. Sprint would be in an entirely different position today. USCC would be an ideal fit.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hit USCC roaming in Washington.

 

3G and LTE. LTE was band 12 5MHz. Tested it and pulled in 6Mbps in nowhereville. Then it changed over to 10MHz after a few miles.

On the Nexus 5? Is it an unlocked version? This would put a dent in the theory that unlocked devices can't connect to LTE Roaming.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the Nexus 5? Is it an unlocked version? This would put a dent in the theory that unlocked devices can't connect to LTE Roaming.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

I wish. Not band 12 on the N5. The S6 had LTE, not mine. So I don't know if B2, B5 or B4 was on either in that area.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the Nexus 5? Is it an unlocked version? This would put a dent in the theory that unlocked devices can't connect to LTE Roaming.

 

Just FYI, we need to be careful going forward with our use of the term "unlocked."

 

Likely, few would confuse it with an international unlock.  But many Sprint variant handsets now can be domestically unlocked -- once certain criteria are met.  While it is possible that a domestic unlocked handset might lose LTE roaming capability, we have no evidence of that at this time.

 

So, the class of handsets in question about LTE roaming is the one that I have referred to as "unlocked, third party."  That is not a very elegant description.  Perhaps "non operator branded" would fit the bill better.  However, we should not say "unlocked" just to refer to Sprint compatible handsets purchased directly from Google, Motorola, etc.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Falls City Nebraska -

iPhone 6 : LTE Extended

GS5 : 3G roaming US Cellular

 

Burchard Nebraska (of all places) -

iPhone 6 : LTE Extended

GS5 : 3G roaming US Cellular

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Falls City Nebraska -

iPhone 6 : LTE Extended

GS5 : 3G roaming US Cellular

 

Burchard Nebraska (of all places) -

iPhone 6 : LTE Extended

GS5 : 3G roaming US Cellular

My note 5 won't connect to LTE roaming either, it seems Samsung phones have not gotten access yet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My note 5 won't connect to LTE roaming either, it seems Samsung phones have not gotten access yet.

 

LTE roaming soft launch, people, soft launch.  We should and do hope for more -- especially from unlocked, third party handsets.  But until an official announcement, the jury is out.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...