Jump to content

Sprint Roaming+ - Coverage Map Update


clbowens

Recommended Posts

It would help a lot in a lot of places, but as far as we know the owners of US Cellular are not willing to sell the company. Such a merger is discussed frequently here because USCC is a good fit for Sprint from an asset and footprint standpoint, but it looks like USCC is content to be an independent roaming partner for the foreseeable future.

For a carrier that isnt nationwide USCC is a rip off. 60 dollars for1GB of data. Would sprint be able to increase band 26 to 10x10 in USCC areas if they bought them out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a carrier that isnt nationwide USCC is a rip off. 60 dollars for1GB of data. Would sprint be able to increase band 26 to 10x10 in USCC areas if they bought them out?

No as that would require new equipment as that is release 11 LTE.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No as that would require new equipment as that is release 11 LTE.

 

 

What is release 11? 

Yeah I'm not sure what about 10x10 on Band 26 requires the equipment to be upgraded to release 11. Wasn't Verizon running release 9 for the longest time and they use 10x10?

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notwithstanding the equipment, they could only expand the existing B26 to 10x10 if US Cellular owned the A-block in the area.  Otherwise, it would have to be done as separate carriers.  (Long-term, they could get up to 15x15, even, in those areas.)

 

- Trip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I'm not sure what about 10x10 on Band 26 requires the equipment to be upgraded to release 11. Wasn't Verizon running release 9 for the longest time and they use 10x10?

 

-Anthony

Remember folks the issue is that band 5 is seperate from band 26 spectrum. Band 13 verizon is using is contiguous spectrum. If sprint bough USCC, it would require new equipment to aggregate the separate spectrum together and it would be usable only in USCC areas. Not worth it to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I think it would be best for Sprint to get into a position to acquire USCC.  I think USCC can float a long for a while.  Would need a decent subscriber loss to impact them though.  Even then, they might just continue to shed assets and maybe even market regions.  Would be good for Sprint to at least be ready to acquire CLR, PCS, and tower licenses. 

 

Shoot, as regional carriers bit the dust, I think that Sprint needs to be in a better position to buy them out, or acquire assets.  I think this is the most realistic goal for Sprint while they try to fix their debt and losses situation while still being on the lookout for assets. CCA is a great short term fix for increased "native" 3G/LTE coverage and roaming coverage, but I see these as more shortish term fixes while Sprint tries to get healthy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a carrier that isnt nationwide USCC is a rip off. 60 dollars for1GB of data. Would sprint be able to increase band 26 to 10x10 in USCC areas if they bought them out?

 

 

No as that would require new equipment as that is release 11 LTE.

 

Edit: It would require new equipment due to the limitations listed by Tim below ... not due to the LTE release version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Samsung, KMW / Powerave [Alcatel-Lucent], Ericsson B26 equipment are designed and certified for 817-824 range so no CL850 capability. 

 

Also you can't aggregate Sub 1 GHz spectrum easily so that's out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Samsung, KMW / Powerave [Alcatel-Lucent], Ericsson B26 equipment are designed and certified for 817-824 range so no CL850 capability. 

 

Also you can't aggregate Sub 1 GHz spectrum easily so that's out. 

 

Cannot be re-certified?

 

Well, still it's not an LTE release issue then. Anyway... probably not going to happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cannot be re-certified?

 

Well, still it's not an LTE release issue then. Anyway... probably not going to happen.

You can't recertify something if it was never designed or compatible for it

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second, I think it was already mentioned, but Sprint cannot expand it's current B26 holding to 10x10 because there is no contiguous spectrum available. Sprint holds all of the SMR spectrum that is available for commercial cell use. USCC spectrum is in the 850 range, so Sprint would have to deploy a second carrier rather than expand the first in this hypothetical situation. 

 

Leaving aside the equipment issue for the moment, isn't SMR contiguous with CLR A block?

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sprint could ever Buy USCC. They would be better off changeing their name to USCC since, theres alot of people who

have a bad taste in their mouth told Sprint. Sprint's network has done a complete 180. However some people will not care

when they hear the name sprint.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sprint could ever Buy USCC. They would be better off changeing their name to USCC since, theres alot of people who

have a bad taste in their mouth told Sprint. Sprint's network has done a complete 180. However some people will not care

when they hear the name sprint.

Not the case in ct. Improved in areas not a 180.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sprint could ever Buy USCC. They would be better off changeing their name to USCC since, theres alot of people who

have a bad taste in their mouth told Sprint. Sprint's network has done a complete 180. However some people will not care

when they hear the name sprint.

 

Hence the reason for Sprint's newest ads that focus on showing that Sprint is faster and more reliable than Verizon or at&t or T-Mobile. I feel that the Sprint name should stick and when the time is right, people will wake up to the fact that the "New" Sprint is far better than the "Old" Sprint was in 2012- mid 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hence the reason for Sprint's newest ads that focus on showing that Sprint is faster and more reliable than Verizon or at&t or T-Mobile. I feel that the Sprint name should stick and when the time is right, people will wake up to the fact that the "New" Sprint is far better than the "Old" Sprint was in 2012- mid 2015.

Sprint still has work to do. Faster than vzw. So so on that one. Test 2xca yesterday. 55 Mbps vzw in the same location almost 100. Sprint needs to build out to atleast att's Coverage.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint very well could throw up a few hundred B26/B10 (maybe even with B25 LTE and B1 1x) and match tmobiles coverage...i think they probably will in the next few years once their existing network is strong.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>If they did any expansion, I'd rather then do surgical expansion.  I don't care that they are the fourth largest coverage wise.  They  have been for a long time.  Even when TMobile's network was largely 2G, it was still a bigger native network.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>Get B41 on more macros faster.  It seems like they finished up in my city, and they seem to have only hit maybe 1/3 of the macro sites. Been a long time since I have seen a new B41 site, yet they seem to have prepped just about all the towers for the additional antennas. </p>

<p> </p>

<p> </p>

<p>As far as a USCC merger, It would be pretty good for Sprint in terms of the integration investment. Would Sprint actually go through and update all the hardware at all the sites?  Seems like it could be a decent integration as most the coverage is completely new, and then in markets they both have coverage seems like there would be a lot of different integration options at hand.  But then I have no clue what kind of equipment USCC uses, how things are configured.  All I know is they have B12 running most places with some B5 here and there?</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...