Jump to content

Sprint Roaming+ - Coverage Map Update


clbowens

Recommended Posts

The coverage map is a mess, still too small and too many colors.

 

You want fewer colors?  That would mean less delineation, less gradation.  Do you actually want less information?  You cannot have it both ways.  And the colors of the Data coverage map tool are nicely orthogonal -- unlike many of the almost indistinguishable shades of the same color that other operators use to obfuscate their network coverage shortcomings.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You want fewer colors? That would mean less delineation, less gradation. Do you actually want less information? You cannot have it both ways. And the colors of the Data coverage map tool are nicely orthogonal -- unlike many of the almost indistinguishable shades of the same color that other operators use to obfuscate their network coverage shortcomings.

 

AJ

I like it better when the coverage map has closer colors. Like how project Fi coverage looks a lot better than sprints

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The coverage map is a mess, still too small and too many colors.

 

My only gripe is that the purple color is a little too close in shades. Off the top of my head don't they have like 3 or 4 different shades of purple going on? If the colors where a couple shades lighter/darker from one another, I believe that would really clean up the roaming on the map.

And to also beat the dead horse... a larger coverage map.  :dead:

 

But I think overall I'm glad they went with a lot of "different" colors, because each one really stands out. You can tell exactly where there is LTE, Spark/Enhanced LTE and where it's still falling back to 3G easily. It would be terrible if they decided to go with different shades of Orange to depict all LTE service. The yellow on orange on purple works well IMO.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting.  The Nexus 5X does not show LTE roaming still.

 

A remote possibility, albeit one we have to consider, is that some unlocked, third party handsets may not receive all Sprint network features, such as LTE roaming or band 41 2x CA.  We certainly have seen some 2x CA concerns among the three unlocked, third party handsets this fall.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

A remote possibility, albeit one we have to consider, is that some unlocked, third party handsets may not receive all Sprint network features, such as LTE roaming or band 41 2x CA. We certainly have seen some 2x CA concerns among the three unlocked, third party handsets this fall.

 

AJ

I believe the 6p does 2x CA successfully at least. I was able to pull a speed test of 75 mbit on B41, which should be faster than a single carrier can do.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the 6p does 2x CA successfully at least. I was able to pull a speed test of 75 mbit on B41, which should be faster than a single carrier can do.

 

Yes, band 41 2x CA may be working on the Nexus 6P.  But I do not keep track of speed tests, nor do I consider them reliable.  Regardless, band 41 can do 75 Mbps downlink on a single carrier.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it better when the coverage map has closer colors. Like how project Fi coverage looks a lot better than sprints

 

I actually think Clear did a real nice job with their coverage map and the color scheme on Sprint's map is less as perfect. People who are color blind can't even get the different networks etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Group 1 = Band 5

Group 2 = Band 5 + Band 2

Group 3 = Band 5 + Band 2 + Band 12

Group 4 = Band 2 + Band 25

 

EDIT: And yes, there is quite a bit of LTE Roaming+ which only appears in Group 4 (meaning it's band 25 only) -- CCA / RRPP?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Group 1 = Band 5
Group 2 = Band 5 + Band 2
Group 3 = Band 5 + Band 2 + Band 12
Group 4 = Band 2 + Band 25
 
EDIT: And yes, there is quite a bit of LTE Roaming+ which only appears in Group 4 (meaning it's band 25 only) -- CCA / RRPP?

 

 

How did you come to determine those group and band associations?  Did you find some embedded metadata during your map mining process?

 

Regardless, I would take any of the Sprint coverage tool LTE roaming maps with a grain of salt right now.  It may take a few weeks or even months to get settled.  For example, Rickie posted earlier today that the LG G4 is one of the devices that can be selected and shows LTE roaming footprint now.  However, the map is of one of the groups, not the broadest LTE roaming footprint -- even though the LG G4 is a Sprint variant handset and fully CCA/RRPP compliant across all bands.

 

To elaborate a bit further, those handsets that can be selected and display any LTE roaming footprint right now all seem to default to group 4.  The differences in Nex-Tech Wireless coverage in Kansas show this quite clearly.  So, maybe the only LTE roaming presently accessible is band 2, band 25, or both via MFBI.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Group 1 = Band 5
Group 2 = Band 5 + Band 2
Group 3 = Band 5 + Band 2 + Band 12
Group 4 = Band 2 + Band 25
 
EDIT: And yes, there is quite a bit of LTE Roaming+ which only appears in Group 4 (meaning it's band 25 only) -- CCA / RRPP?

 

 

Yes, to follow up again, you or Sprint will need to double check the group and band associations.  Nex-Tech Wireless in Kansas holds no Cellular 850 MHz spectrum, so band 5 is out of the question.  However, what you show as group 1 has LTE roaming coverage within the Nex-Tech footprint.  That cannot be band 5.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTE roaming is nice, but it makes that 100/300MB limit seem a lot smaller. My sister went through her entire roaming allowance tonight. I know data use is data use, but LTE makes it much easier to use up vs evdo/1x.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, to follow up again, you or Sprint will need to double check the group and band associations.  Nex-Tech Wireless in Kansas holds no Cellular 850 MHz spectrum, so band 5 is out of the question.  However, what you show as group 1 has LTE roaming coverage within the Nex-Tech footprint.  That cannot be band 5.

 

It's band 12. I'll run through it again later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's band 12. I'll run through it again later.

 

Nex-Tech holds Lower 700 MHz licenses, so band 12 makes sense.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTE roaming is nice, but it makes that 100/300MB limit seem a lot smaller. My sister went through her entire roaming allowance tonight. I know data use is data use, but LTE makes it much easier to use up vs evdo/1x.

 

That is on the person.  We make no excuses here.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is on the person. We make no excuses here.

 

AJ

I'm not making any excuses. But they may want to reevaluate roaming on a whole. They give far better international options than they do for domestic.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not making any excuses. But they may want to reevaluate roaming on a whole. They give far better international options than they do for domestic.

 

How about no data roaming?  Does that sound good?  It could happen.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about no data roaming? Does that sound good? It could happen.

 

AJ

Sure, if they also make my plan cheaper or actually follow through on their planned network expansion in a timely manner.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, if they also make my plan cheaper or actually follow through on their planned network expansion in a timely manner.

 

No, sorry, you signed on under previous or current circumstances.  Sprint does not owe you anything more.  No lower plan costs, no network expansion.

 

That is a dose of reality.  Maybe the future will be different.  But we do not know.  And that is my point.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, sorry, you signed on under previous or current circumstances.  Sprint does not owe you anything more.  No lower plan costs, no network expansion.

 

That is a dose of reality.  Maybe the future will be different.  But we do not know.  And that is my point.

 

AJ

I was replying toward your response of removing roaming data all together. You are right, I signed on with data roaming available. I was simply stating they may want to overhaul their domestic roaming options when they have far better options available for international. And to be clear, I'm not asking for anything for free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was replying toward your response of removing roaming data all together. You are right, I signed on with data roaming available. I was simply stating they may want to overhaul their domestic roaming options when they have far better options available for international. And to be clear, I'm not asking for anything for free.

 

Domestic data roaming is expensive.  Sprint competes against VZW, USCC, etc.  They do not have economic initiative to help each other at reduced roaming rates.  That is not likely to change.  And even if the FCC were to take action, roaming rates still would not be cheap.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Domestic data roaming is expensive.  Sprint competes against VZW, USCC, etc.  They do not have economic initiative to help each other at reduced roaming rates.  That is not likely to change.  And even if the FCC were to take action, roaming rates still would not be cheap.

 

AJ

I'm not asking for cheap roaming rates, I know it is expensive. I would just like any option available. On the international side, they have unlimited 2g available or 1GB of high speed plus $15/GB overage. Even if they were to charge double or triple that overage rate, it's better than having nothing available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not asking for cheap roaming rates, I know it is expensive. I would just like any option available. On the international side, they have unlimited 2g available or 1GB of high speed plus $15/GB overage. Even if they were to charge double or triple that overage rate, it's better than having nothing available.

 

International is a separate situation.  Sprint does not compete against Vodafone, Telefonica, etc.  See the difference?

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...