Jump to content

Sprint Roaming+ - Coverage Map Update


clbowens

Recommended Posts

I would be willing to pay more in the form of an add on data pack similar to international data offerings already available.

 

Years ago, Sprint offered a la carte (voice) roaming packs.  That might be a good idea again for data.

 

AJ 

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with that, maybe set amount for each 1gb of roaming data

 

How does $25 sound?

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problems uscc being lte roaming, I would like a higher cap then 100/300 mbs on the roaming though

Personally I don't know... 100 may be on the stingy side on the newer plans, but I fail to see how 300 isn't enough. A fairly common roaming situation is someone on vacation for a week or someone going back to visit family for a week in a non-native coverage area. 300 MB still allows you to send 400 emails, visit 200 we pages, and upload 200 pictures to social media. It isn't going to allow you to slingbox back to your TV at home or stream Netflix, but nor should it for that matter. If people find themselves needing more than 300 MB in roaming on a regular (or even somewhat infrequent basis) a different carrier may be needed for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I don't know... 100 may be on the stingy side on the newer plans, but I fail to see how 300 isn't enough. A fairly common roaming situation is someone on vacation for a week or someone going back to visit family for a week in a non-native coverage area. 300 MB still allows you to send 400 emails, visit 200 we pages, and upload 200 pictures to social media. It isn't going to allow you to slingbox back to your TV at home or stream Netflix, but nor should it for that matter. If people find themselves needing more than 300 MB in roaming on a regular (or even somewhat infrequent basis) a different carrier may be needed for them.

I dont care about the streaming video, my previous job I traveled a lot into roaming areas. I would come close to the 300 all the time, and that was on 3G. I can only imagine, how fast it would go with lte.  As AJ says 25 bucks for 1gb would be good for me :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont care about the streaming video, my previous job I traveled a lot into roaming areas. I would come close to the 300 all the time, and that was on 3G. I can only imagine, how fast it would go with lte.  As AJ says 25 bucks for 1gb would be good for me :D

 

Your data might go faster on LTE, but your roaming data quota would not get used up faster.  That would be on you -- something that you do not have to do.  Let us make that perfectly clear.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont care about the streaming video, my previous job I traveled a lot into roaming areas. I would come close to the 300 all the time,

And that type of situation is what the last sentence in my post was directed towards. Here in Omaha we are in a great situation to benefit from the US Cellular Roaming deal (look at the coverage map for why). However, I don't and still wouldn't recommend Sprint to friends or family that regularly travel to smaller cities for work. If you find yourself hitting or coming close to hitting the roaming cap "all the time" to me that is a sign you need a different carrier.

 and that was on 3G. I can only imagine, how fast it would go with lte. 

Echoing AJ, 300 MB is 300 MB. I tried showed how much "regular" stuff you could do with 300 MB in a week assuming vacation usage. LTE just lets you accomplish those tasks quicker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that type of situation is what the last sentence in my post was directed towards. Here in Omaha we are in a great situation to benefit from the US Cellular Roaming deal (look at the coverage map for why). However, I don't and still wouldn't recommend Sprint to friends or family that regularly travel to smaller cities for work. If you find yourself hitting or coming close to hitting the roaming cap "all the time" to me that is a sign you need a different carrier.

Echoing AJ, 300 MB is 300 MB. I tried showed how much "regular" stuff you could do with 300 MB in a week assuming vacation usage. LTE just lets you accomplish those tasks quicker.

Sprint works for me when I'm home great. But there's no doubt when I leave the interstates in Iowa for occasional weeks on rural jobs, I turn on my work phone mobile hotspot to keep me from going over the cap.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

USCC using B5 for LTE?  Im near USCC territory and go into their territory a few times a year.  At least I'll have 3G now which is veryable usable which will be good, but still just wondering.

 

East TN between Cleveland and Knoxville and then West North Carolina west of Ashville.  Anyone know if these areas are using B5 and/or B12 LTE?

 

If it is B12, just another reason to upgrade phones sooner. :-D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

USCC using B5 for LTE?  Im near USCC territory and go into their territory a few times a year.  At least I'll have 3G now which is veryable usable which will be good, but still just wondering.

 

East TN between Cleveland and Knoxville and then West North Carolina west of Ashville.  Anyone know if these areas are using B5 and/or B12 LTE?

 

If it is B12, just another reason to upgrade phones sooner. :-D

I would like to know for eastern NC?  :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I don't know... 100 may be on the stingy side on the newer plans, but I fail to see how 300 isn't enough. A fairly common roaming situation is someone on vacation for a week or someone going back to visit family for a week in a non-native coverage area. 300 MB still allows you to send 400 emails, visit 200 we pages, and upload 200 pictures to social media. It isn't going to allow you to slingbox back to your TV at home or stream Netflix, but nor should it for that matter. If people find themselves needing more than 300 MB in roaming on a regular (or even somewhat infrequent basis) a different carrier may be needed for them.

 

Im curious about what they define as a webpage size.

 

Ive noticed that every month my data usage inches up, with my usage pattern being the same. According to my phone, it is Google Chrome that is using up the most data.

 

That leads me to the conclusion that webpages are becoming more and more data hungry. The developers add more and more bloat without considering data usage.

 

The NYT had an article recently on how ads are exploding the size of webpages

 

Thanks to ads, the Boston.com homepage takes up almost 20MB on a single load.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/01/business/cost-of-mobile-ads.html

 

Visiting that home page just 5 times would blow through your monthly roaming allocation.

 

Thats insane.

 

And unfortunately, from the user end, we have no idea how much data any given webpage will take up before we visit it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eastern NC could be either one (they own licenses for both) but they only own CLR/B5 in TN so you should be good with a B5 phone there.

 

Im a dummy, I could have looked that up.  In West North Carolina USCC does have 700 A+B in Cherokee/Ashiville area, but even further west (which Im more interested in) they only have 700B.  So my Nexus 5 is golden there for the most part.  Phew

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Click thumbnail for full resolution.

 

Nationwide LTE roaming (without Roaming+):

 

lteroam-no-plus-small.png

 

Kansas LTE Roaming+ (without extended roaming):

 

roamplus-ks-small.png

 

Mississippi LTE Roaming+ (without extended roaming):

 

roamplus-ms-small.png

 

As of right now, selecting device-specific coverage reverts to showing LTE coverage without roaming; however, I found some additional tile sets, denoted only as groups 1-4, which may indicate device-specific, partner-specific, or account-specific coverage.

 

Nationwide LTE+ (no group):

 

spark-roamplus-small.png

 

Nationwide LTE+ (group 1):

 

spark-roamplus-group1-small.png

 

Nationwide LTE+ (group 2):

 

spark-roamplus-group2-small.png

 

Nationwide LTE+ (group 3):

 

spark-roamplus-group3-small.png

 

Nationwide LTE+ (group 4):

 

spark-roamplus-group4-small.png

 

Kansas LTE+ (no group):

 

spark-roamplus-ks-small.png

 

Kansas LTE+ (group 1):

 

spark-roamplus-ks-group1-small.png

 

Kansas LTE+ (group 2):

 

spark-roamplus-ks-group2-small.png

 

Kansas LTE+ (group 3):

 

spark-roamplus-ks-group3-small.png

 

Kansas LTE+ (group 4):

 

spark-roamplus-ks-group4-small.png

 

Mississippi LTE+ (no group):

 

spark-roamplus-ms-small.png

 

Mississippi LTE+ (group 1):

 

spark-roamplus-ms-group1-small.png

 

Mississippi LTE+ (group 2):

 

spark-roamplus-ms-group2-small.png

 

Mississippi LTE+ (group 3):

 

spark-roamplus-ms-group3-small.png

 

Mississippi LTE+ (group 4):

 

spark-roamplus-ms-group4-small.png

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im a dummy, I could have looked that up.  In West North Carolina USCC does have 700 A+B in Cherokee/Ashiville area, but even further west (which Im more interested in) they only have 700B.  So my Nexus 5 is golden there for the most part.  Phew

 

The Nexus 5 does not support band 12, so it will not attach to any USCC LTE 700.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of right now, selecting device-specific coverage reverts to showing LTE coverage without roaming; however, I found some additional tile sets, denoted only as groups 1-4, which may indicate device-specific, partner-specific, or account-specific coverage.

 

These seem like they may be device specific. Perhaps according to what bands specific devices are able to connect to. Maybe Sprint is still programming each device into their respective group in order to display it correctly. Those of us with  phones with all compatible bands like the Nexus 6, GS6, etc look like we end up in the "No Group" section.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These seem like they may be device specific. Perhaps according to what bands specific devices are able to connect to. Perhaps Sprint is still programming each device into their respective group in order to display it correctly. Those of us with  phones with all compatible bands like the Nexus 6, GS6, etc look like we end up in the "No Group" section.

 

For Nex-Tech Wireless in western Kansas, I suspect the groupings are some mix of band 2 and band 12, maybe band 25, too.  I suppose I should use my tech editor s4gru.com e-mail address to send an official inquiry to Nex-Tech.

 

AJ

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Click thumbnail for full resolution.

 

Nationwide LTE roaming (without Roaming+):

 

lteroam-no-plus-small.png

 

I'm still sorta confused why there are huge chunks of LTE roaming on USCC missing in eastern Oregon. It doesn't seem to be a band issue...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still sorta confused why there are huge chunks of LTE roaming on USCC missing in eastern Oregon. It doesn't seem to be a band issue...

They're still rolling out lte roaming. This is a by all means a soft launch to get things rolling.

 

When it's truly ready we'll definitely see marcelo making a big announcement of it.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...