Jump to content

Sprint Roaming+ - Coverage Map Update


clbowens

Recommended Posts

For a carrier that isnt nationwide USCC is a rip off. 60 dollars for1GB of data. Would sprint be able to increase band 26 to 10x10 in USCC areas if they bought them out?

I think they have the reputation of having the best local coverage. At least in Wisconsin they have that rep.

 

Heck there are a few areas that if I drop Sprint signal.. There's a strong USC signal to Roam on.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I experienced what I believe to be LTE roaming on US Cellular today on us-151 about halfway between Madison Wisconsin and Dubuque Iowa. The data performance was very solid.

 

2aa34fa4a26718494a68a2632bdda329.jpg

 

acce338e2c8e01f8b3fa4817472bb224.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I experienced what I believe to be LTE roaming on US Cellular today on us-151 about halfway between Madison Wisconsin and Dubuque Iowa. The data performance was very solid.

 

What device were you using?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a full weekend of roaming in KY, LTE speeds were unthrottled until hit hard cap of 300MB.

 

The 3G was good on Bluegrass pulling it over 2Mbps. Appalachian Wireless isn't native roaming, and has a 150Kbps throttle, unless it just sucks as a 3G provider.

 

At least Bluegrass seemed like 1x was PCS and CDMA was 850MHz. CDMA was always +10dBm stronger.

 

I'm not 100%, but it seemed like Bluegrass Cellular counted against LTE and 3G rushing buckets. Not 100% though on that but have that sneaking suspicion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a full weekend of roaming in KY, LTE speeds were unthrottled until hit hard cap of 300MB.

 

The 3G was good on Bluegrass pulling it over 2Mbps. Appalachian Wireless isn't native roaming, and has a 150Kbps throttle, unless it just sucks as a 3G provider.

 

At least Bluegrass seemed like 1x was PCS and CDMA was 850MHz. CDMA was always +10dBm stronger.

 

I'm not 100%, but it seemed like Bluegrass Cellular counted against LTE and 3G rushing buckets. Not 100% though on that but have that sneaking suspicion.

Bluegrass Cellular is supposed to be extended coverage and thus not count against your roaming.

 

Also, were you roaming on Bluegrass LTE? If so where?

 

I live in the Bluegrass Cellular area and still haven't seen LTE roaming on my iPhone 6s Plus. Then again I haven't went to an area yet where only BG was available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, when we got into Manchester, we just started roaming on Appalachian Wireless and my wife went through 100MB roaming already (checked via sprint.com).  That shouldn't of happened.  So not sure what happened there.

 

As far as Bluegrass LTE, I was driving and my wife commented on LTE outside of Sprint coverage, so that is all I got to go on.  I don't have SCP running on her phone as I just use engineering screen but was unable to look at it.   On Appalachian Wireless the LTE was 10MHz B12, ran one speed test and got 10Mbps with decent signal.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats pretty cool.  I emailed Apalachian Wireless about some lack of coverage in Oneida.  Small town of ~400 where there is a school.  Zero coverage in that town for anyone.  I told them to install at least a microcell for the small community.  I went there for a high school graduation and there were and are a ton of people in that little town.  

 

They actually replied back to me, even though I told them I have Sprint and know that they are Sprint's roaming partner! Pretty cool customer support. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Map got updated 5/16.

 

I see a little new LTE coverage from Blue Ridge, GA to Ellijay, GA.  Looks like 4 or 5 towers finally got LTE online.

 

From the two previous maps, it seems like Sprint is plucking away at the 3G->LTE conversion.

 

Don't know why Alabama isn't getting any love.  Seems like 3G to LTE has all but stopped, there is no B41 present in the whole state and place like Birmingham could have a 2nd PCS LTE carrier but does not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My brother lives in Ellijay. He'll be happy to see that.

 

Sent from OnePlus 2 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any LTE roaming at Yellowstone National Park?  I see some purple for 3G, whom is that roaming provider? On coverage maps says "Nationwide Sprint Network"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any LTE roaming at Yellowstone National Park?  I see some purple for 3G, whom is that roaming provider? On coverage maps says "Nationwide Sprint Network"

 

That shade of purple is actually "Extended Network" which is one of the roaming partners. 

 

Roaming in these areas counts as on network usage. Similar level of service as on network, but not all services may be available
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any LTE roaming at Yellowstone National Park? I see some purple for 3G, whom is that roaming provider? On coverage maps says "Nationwide Sprint Network"

Nope, I was just there this week. No service period actually on any of the big 4 in most of the park. Verizon had CDMA service at Old Faithful that I could roam on, and Verizon LTE was there too. But once I left the buildings there it was back to no service on Sprint, Verizon, and AT&T.

 

I think this is the microwave relay Verizon was using (no wifi at any of the buildings), and there was a corresponding one at the west entrance to the park.

f76477224f653698b9679bf1ee78b112.jpg

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anybody know what provider has service in Robbinsville, NC and Hillsville, VA? Both show as extended LTE on the map. Also, will either place count again my 300MB limit? Thank you.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that is US Cellular territory, and will count toward roaming.

 

Between the two cities, though, is Carolina West Wireless, which may or may not count. 

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that is US Cellular territory, and will count toward roaming.

 

Between the two cities, though, is Carolina West Wireless, which may or may not count. 

 

- Trip

 

Thanks for the quick response. It's good to know I'll have to go easy on data. I just downloaded a bunch of music and offline maps, so I shouldn't need too much data while I'm out of native service. I'll have wifi in the hotel too, so I should be fine.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If anyone has trouble reading Sprint's map (Like I do) because of the similar shades of yellow, I found Sprint's map but with different colors. It is on Boost Mobile's website, so it doesn't have some of the LTE roaming agreements like with USCC, but it's pretty much the same otherwise. I definitely found it helpful. 

 

https://coverage.sprint.com/mycoverage.jsp?id=BO543STC

 

Hope it helps!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if this is new, but I just noticed that Sprint's towers in Rappahannock County, Virginia are not included on the map, even though, to my knowledge, Sprint is the only carrier with coverage in large parts of that county. 

 

On top of that, no B41 is shown in the Shentel region even though we know it exists.

 

I'm also puzzled to see that US Cellular is unavailable for LTE roaming in Halifax County, VA, even though the surrounding US Cellular counties do have it.

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, so I think I finally figured out the color for this category. So am I reading the map correctly and see there is no coverage of this sort in NM?

There is a very limited area of "Extended Coverage" (EVDO) on the border with Texas, but it does not add much at all to the overall footprint.

 

Sent from my LG G4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

On the coverage maps, Sprint needs to add another color under "3G and more". They should have a color were we are guaranteed 3G off-network roaming.  Like USCC territory and Appalachian Wireless territory.  Roaming on these networks should have a different color, as the 3G vs 1X experience is a huge difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Yes! That does keep it from wandering off Dish and most importantly, reconnecting immediately (at least where there is n70). Thanks!
    • I have my Dish phone locked to NR-only.  That keeps it on Dish and only occasionally will it see T-Mobile NR SA for brief periods before going to no service. I also don't have mine band locked beyond that, except that I have some of the unused bands turned off just to try to reduce scan time.  Fortunately, my Dish phone is the one with the MediaTek chipset, so it has NR neighbor cells, and I can usually see n71, n70, n66, and sometimes n29 (market-dependent) through those regardless of which band it's connected to as primary. - Trip
    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...