Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion V2


lilotimz

Recommended Posts

I'll go ahead and post this here.

 

That was simply mesmerizing! The only inkling of Sprint in that being the yellow-colored lightning bolts at around 0:21-0:25.

 

Anyways, considering Sprint has the most spectrum, curious that T-Mobile didn't find somewhere to give a more noticeable reference to Sprint, seeing as Sprint has been a supporter of more spectrum set aside for smaller carriers.

 

Of course though, this is representative of how Jon Legere sees himself. Instead of making comic cartoons like this though, he ought to be focusing on preparing for a merger with a company that has spectrum. Sadly, Dish looks like it is that company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chicagoans will consume the new additional bandwidth quickly. It will be back to the same thing in a few months. The unlimited abusers will make sure of it. http://www.reddit.com/r/tmobile/comments/3apjxl/please_just_stop_talking_about_deprioritization/

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chicagoans will consume the new additional bandwidth quickly. It will be back to the same thing in a few months. The unlimited abusers will make sure of it. http://www.reddit.com/r/tmobile/comments/3apjxl/please_just_stop_talking_about_deprioritization/

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

It is something I've been concerned about, considering if the 15x15 is going to be enough spectrum to last with workable speeds until next year, which is why T-Mobile needs the spectrum Dish has. With both 15x15 AWS and 15x15 AWS-3, there shouldn't be any concerns of congestion, even with unlimited data. However, that requires a merger between Dish and T-Mobile.

 

The 600mhz option might be enough for T-Mobile without a Dish merger, but T-Mobile would need to acquire at least 15x15 of that, so they'd have 60mhz between that and AWS, again that 60mhz being minimal of what T-Mobile needs for keeping unlimited sustainable here in Chicago. Even better with that extra 30mhz of AWS-3 spectrum Dish has to offer.

 

So, I'm going to have to consider these issues on whether I keep T-Mobile and order the $275 Sony Xperia Z Ultra, which is my device choice for T-Mobile until a possible Dish merger where I'd upgrade to a newer more expensive AWS-3 device, or I get Verizon, where since Verizon didn't get any AWS-3 spectrum, I can go ahead and get the latest Sony Xperia Z4v.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't seem like TMo has a lot of PCS there. At least for supporting three technologies. Though maybe TMo is already planning for 5x5 on PCS?

Interesting you mentioned T-Mobile's PCS. I just finished posting in the Marcelo thread regarding my idea for Sprint to sell its PCS, in order to help pay for a massive densification of its band 41, rather than doing the densifiction to complement the PCS. Realizing how much better band 41 is than PCS, especially as Sprint has much more band 41 than PCS, there really isn't a need to keep PCS, other than for its rural areas where band 41 densification costs are not justified, besides the whole triband concept.

 

Anyways, if Sprint sold its PCS to T-Mobile, for example; in the Chicago Market, if T-Mobile converted PCS to LTE, then T-Mobile would have 15x15 PCS, along with its current 15x15 AWS. This would be enough for T-Mobile's unlimited data to be sustainable for the next few years, granted if they don't double their unlimited data subscribers by then.

 

If T-Mobile were to get that, plus an additional 15x15 either from the 600 mhz auction, or from the AWS-3 spectrum from Dish, they'd be pretty much set. Even better for fun, 30mhz 600, 30mhz AWS, 30mhz PCS, and 30mhz AWS-3. That would make an unlimited data powerhouse!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyways, if Sprint sold its PCS to T-Mobile, for example; in the Chicago Market, if T-Mobile converted PCS to LTE, then T-Mobile would have 15x15 PCS, along with its current 15x15 AWS. This would be enough for T-Mobile's unlimited data to be sustainable for the next few years, granted if they don't double their unlimited data subscribers by then.

 

You do realize that Sprint used to be called Sprint PCS and that 1900mhz is their bread and butter. Selling that would be akin to selling the company.

 

I get that you want T-Mobile to succeed, but that just asinine my friend.

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize that Sprint used to be called Sprint PCS and that 1900mhz is their bread and butter. Selling that would be akin to selling the company.

 

I get that you want T-Mobile to succeed, but that just asinine my friend.

My suggestion for Sprint to sell its PCS spectrum to T-Mobile, while it certainly would help T-Mobile, there are reasons I have in thinking it would help Sprint, which I explain in the Marcelo thread.

 

While I'm well aware of the SprintPCS days, now is a new Sprint where its future isn't its PCS spectrum, it is the band 41 spectrum and the focus of what appears to be a new Sprint. Sure I've been critical of Sprint, but I've also praised them, particularly regarding band 41, which in my experience has been far better than PCS.

 

Besides, its a new focus for Sprint which is seeing many of its old executives of the old Sprint leaving, the latest being CTO Stephen Bye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My suggestion for Sprint to sell its PCS spectrum to T-Mobile, while it certainly would help T-Mobile, there are reasons I have in thinking it would help Sprint, which I explain in the Marcelo thread.

 

While I'm well aware of the SprintPCS days, now is a new Sprint where its future isn't its PCS spectrum, it is the band 41 spectrum and the focus of what appears to be a new Sprint. Sure I've been critical of Sprint, but I've also praised them, particularly regarding band 41, which in my experience has been far better than PCS.

 

Besides, its a new focus for Sprint which is seeing many of its old executives of the old Sprint leaving, the latest being CTO Stephen Bye.

 

As you may or may not be aware, Sprint's entire network, since 1995, has been designed and spaced for PCS, and all the spectrum has been deployed and optimized for that. Simple things like voice carriers and evdo carriers handing off between sites, channel assignments, etc. The network is a lot more complex and rendering millions of customer devices by selling off the spectrum they ride on.

 

B41 will enable the fastest speeds, but nothing will replace native 1900 PCS coverage and availability. 

 

Also, I will share that I work for Sprint, and know all too well what our focus is.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

While I'm well aware of the SprintPCS days, now is a new Sprint where its future isn't its PCS spectrum, it is the band 41 spectrum and the focus of what appears to be a new Sprint. Sure I've been critical of Sprint, but I've also praised them, particularly regarding band 41, which in my experience has been far better than PCS.

 

 

 

That is pure fantasy, and you know it.

 

Band 41 does not provide voice services. PCS is the basis of Sprint's CDMA network. If we get to a point when most of PCS is re-farmed to LTE, there will still need to be several CDMA carriers to provide voice services..

 

Even when VoLTE is rolled out, it does not provide reliable enough coverage for a solid VoLTE network. You will need PCS AND SMR for a good VoLTE experience. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of us wanted Sprint to boost their mid band spectrum by acquiring Metro and Leap/Cricket and deploy LTE on the AWS spectrum they partnered with the cablecos. I still think they made a big mistake.

Edited by bigsnake49
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of us wanted Sprint to boost their mid band spectrum by acquiring Metro and Leap/Cricket and deploy LTE on the AWS spectrum they partnered with the cablecos. I still think they made a big mistake.

 

Yeah, the Sprint Board failing to allow Hesse to buy Metro was one of the biggest wireless blunders of all time.  Sprint having that spectrum now would be golden, and Sprint would greatly benefit for Tmo not to have that spectrum.  And missing out on Leap was just icing on the cake.

 

If Sprint could have wound up with Leap and Metro, they would already be Number 2 in many markets as AT&T and Tmo would not have had nearly as much spectrum to compete in many key markets and keep their performance numbers up.  And if Sprint capitalized on those assets appropriately.  Which really, therein lies the rub.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back on track/topic though, with T-Mobile now actively repurposing Metro spectrum for LTE, where do they stand on coverage expansion? I know our friends over on Fierce love to discuss how they are going to grow organically, but I'm curious if there have been any confirmations of the fact.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back on track/topic though, with T-Mobile now actively repurposing Metro spectrum for LTE, where do they stand on coverage expansion? I know our friends over on Fierce love to discuss how they are going to grow organically, but I'm curious if there have been any confirmations of the fact.

 

Other than LTE GMO of EDGE sites and B12 extending coverage, I don't know of any, yet.  Although I hear rumors of the Northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan having work started on expansion.  They are supposed to have LTE expanded to my region before the end of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other than LTE GMO of EDGE sites and B12 extending coverage, I don't know of any, yet.  Although I hear rumors of the Northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan having work started on expansion.  They are supposed to have LTE expanded to my region before the end of the year.

 

When you say they are expanding LTE in your region, does that mean T-Mobile does offer native EDGE coverage in some areas, for license protection?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the Sprint Board failing to allow Hesse to buy Metro was one of the biggest wireless blunders of all time.  Sprint having that spectrum now would be golden, and Sprint would greatly benefit for Tmo not to have that spectrum.  And missing out on Leap was just icing on the cake.

 

If Sprint could have wound up with Leap and Metro, they would already be Number 2 in many markets as AT&T and Tmo would not have had nearly as much spectrum to compete in many key markets and keep their performance numbers up.  And if Sprint capitalized on those assets appropriately.  Which really, therein lies the rub.

I live in a area where Leap (Cricket CDMA) was but not Metro PCS CDMA, but still the extra spectrum would of been nice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was simply mesmerizing! The only inkling of Sprint in that being the yellow-colored lightning bolts at around 0:21-0:25.

 

Anyways, considering Sprint has the most spectrum, curious that T-Mobile didn't find somewhere to give a more noticeable reference to Sprint, seeing as Sprint has been a supporter of more spectrum set aside for smaller carriers.

 

Of course though, this is representative of how Jon Legere sees himself. Instead of making comic cartoons like this though, he ought to be focusing on preparing for a merger with a company that has spectrum. Sadly, Dish looks like it is that company.

Sprint only has 14mhz of low band spectrum, which is what the video is about.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They overlapped in a very few areas. Their spectrum and networks were complementary.

 

Very complementary. Both existed here in Las Vegas, but that was definitely the exception, not the rule. Ideally they would've merged back somewhere between 2008-2010. Then Sprint could've moved to acquire the combined company a bit later. Alas, tis water under the bridge at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting you mentioned T-Mobile's PCS. I just finished posting in the Marcelo thread regarding my idea for Sprint to sell its PCS, in order to help pay for a massive densification of its band 41, rather than doing the densifiction to complement the PCS. Realizing how much better band 41 is than PCS, especially as Sprint has much more band 41 than PCS, there really isn't a need to keep PCS, other than for its rural areas where band 41 densification costs are not justified, besides the whole triband concept.

 

Anyways, if Sprint sold its PCS to T-Mobile, for example; in the Chicago Market, if T-Mobile converted PCS to LTE, then T-Mobile would have 15x15 PCS, along with its current 15x15 AWS. This would be enough for T-Mobile's unlimited data to be sustainable for the next few years, granted if they don't double their unlimited data subscribers by then.

 

If T-Mobile were to get that, plus an additional 15x15 either from the 600 mhz auction, or from the AWS-3 spectrum from Dish, they'd be pretty much set. Even better for fun, 30mhz 600, 30mhz AWS, 30mhz PCS, and 30mhz AWS-3. That would make an unlimited data powerhouse!

Why would sprint want to help Tmo? What benefits would sprint get?? Some $$$ a 5x5 isn't gonna generate that much money. If sprint finds itself in need of cash it can just ask masa...

Yes it would be great for Tmo but stupid for sprint

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you say they are expanding LTE in your region, does that mean T-Mobile does offer native EDGE coverage in some areas, for license protection?

 

No.  Tmo does not offer service in my area.  They roam.  All new organic network expansion planned.  They just recently purchased 700-A Block here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would sprint want to help Tmo? What benefits would sprint get?? Some $$$ a 5x5 isn't gonna generate that much money. If sprint finds itself in need of cash it can just ask masa...

Yes it would be great for Tmo but stupid for sprint

T-Mobile might be willing to purchase it for a good price, if they don't end up being able to purchase the amount of 600mhz spectrum they need.

 

Before people get at me for the differences between 600mhz and 1900mhz spectrum, I know there is quite a difference there and while T-Mobile does need more low band spectrum, they also need more spectrum all around.

 

Also, I've added a note to the Sprint PCS issue in the Marcelo thread, which I'll add here then I'll drop it. I didn't mean for Sprint to sell it until they have their NGN project finished, if they chose to have it running as much on their band 41 as possible. Surely they wouldn't sell all of their PCS spectrum, as that is better used in rural areas where establishing a strong band 41 network is very non cost effective. However, in areas where band 41 covers most everything along with the 800mhz, they wouldn't really need a spectrum band which is more limiting to them, and at that point they could sell it, rather than selling band 41 spectrum the analysts have been saying Sprint needs to do for money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.  Tmo does not offer service in my area.  They roam.  All new organic network expansion planned.  They just recently purchased 700-A Block here.

 

Ah interesting, so what happened to their licensed PCS/AWS holdings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile might be willing to purchase it for a good price, if they don't end up being able to purchase the amount of 600mhz spectrum they need.

 

Before people get at me for the differences between 600mhz and 1900mhz spectrum, I know there is quite a difference there and while T-Mobile does need more low band spectrum, they also need more spectrum all around.

 

Also, I've added a note to the Sprint PCS issue in the Marcelo thread, which I'll add here then I'll drop it. I didn't mean for Sprint to sell it until they have their NGN project finished, if they chose to have it running as much on their band 41 as possible. Surely they wouldn't sell all of their PCS spectrum, as that is better used in rural areas where establishing a strong band 41 network is very non cost effective. However, in areas where band 41 covers most everything along with the 800mhz, they wouldn't really need a spectrum band which is more limiting to them, and at that point they could sell it, rather than selling band 41 spectrum the analysts have been saying Sprint needs to do for money.

 

Honestly, the assumption you have that PCS is limited for Sprint is really causing me to scratch my head.

 

For example, Sprint has 15mhz of PCS B block here in NYC, along with 5mhz of G Block. The 15mhz is contiguous, so in theory, combined with the 3 20mhz LTE carriers that Sprint can deploy in the B41 2.5ghz range, they can deploy a 15x15 B25 FDD LTE network combined with the TDD 2.5ghz network and the 5x5 FDD LTE network using B26.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...