Jump to content

Sprint Organic Network Expansion Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

I'm so exhausted so I'm not sure if im making sense so please forgive me...

 

Can sprint also pair up with their LTE roaming partners and maybe add 1x voice to their sites?

 

Also will this organic expansion delay any plans with their LTE roaming partners? If not then taking this organic expansion plan and their LTE roaming deal...this is all great for sprint!!

I don't think this has any impact to Sprint's plans with RRPP members. However, Sprint could add 1x voice service to RRPP members when they add Sprint LTE bands to their networks.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the market is getting wind of Sprint's expansion plans.  Not sure what else would account for today's jump in the stock price. Granted the stock has taken a beating this week after those comments from BTIG. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the market is getting wind of Sprint's expansion plans.  Not sure what else would account for today's jump in the stock price. Granted the stock has taken a beating this week after those comments from BTIG. 

 

Sprint Gains Amid Speculation on Comcast Wireless Ambitions

By Beth Mellor

(Bloomberg) -- Sprint rises as much as 6.9%, most intraday since Feb. 5, on ~51% 3-month daily avg. vol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the 1100 iDEN sites include the ~100 site that have already been converted?

No. That is a previous program, which is largely complete. This is an additional 1,100 sites.
  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if any one can make an overlay of all the decommissioned Nextel site and remove all that already have Sprint on them and those already converted. Im dying to know which 1,100 sites are being converted now. I know of quite of few old nextel only sites that could be used to fill in some coverage gabs.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if any one can make an overlay of all the decommissioned Nextel site and remove all that already have Sprint on them and those already converted. Im dying to know which 1,100 sites are being converted now.

I did something like that in an Excel spreadsheet back in 2012. I never turned it into a map, but always planned to. I couldn't find the file the last time I looked for it. Which was about a year ago. If I had the time, I would just recreate it. And I still may do that.
  • Like 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if any one can make an overlay of all the decommissioned Nextel site and remove all that already have Sprint on them and those already converted. Im dying to know which 1,100 sites are being converted now.

I would like to see the same thing, but I don't believe anyone knows which sites are going to be upgraded yet. Maybe in the near future we will have more information on which sites will be converted.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did something like that in an Excel spreadsheet back in 2012. I never turned it into a map, but always planned to. I couldn't find the file the last time I looked for it. Which was about a year ago. If I had the time, I would just recreate it. And I still may do that.

Robert, couldn't you take the old Nextel Decommissioned Map and just update that with the ones that will be converted? I would think that may be the easiest, but then again, what do I know. :mad2:  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see the same thing, but I don't believe anyone knows which sites are going to be upgraded yet. Maybe in the near future we will have more information on which sites will be converted.

 

It would probably be relatively simple to create a map of the non collocated sites, then as sites are converted highlighting them (with a different color pin).

 

And/or we can hope for a leak of the actual sites to be converted. :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert, couldn't you take the old Nextel Decommissioned Map and just update that with the ones that will be converted? I would think that may be the easiest, but then again, what do I know. :mad2:

Yes, that is what I'm proposing. But it still requires a judgment call on thousands of data points. Especially for density sites inside existing coverage areas. The last time I did it, it took me a week of free time. And I'd like to do it again. I may have time soon.
  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, that is what I'm proposing. But it still requires a judgment call on thousands of data points. The last time I did it, it took me a week of free time. And I'd like to do it again. I may have time soon.

 

Need a volunteer to help?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did Sprint ever get faster at turning up MW backhaul then they were in the initial Chicago deployment? If they did the remaining sites and expansion should pick up pace.

 

Sent from my 831C using Tapatalk

Sprint filed frequcy coordination  for hundreds of New Microwave paths last November covering Washington, Colorado, Iowa, Illnios and Ohio

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint filed frequcy coordination  for hundreds of New Microwave paths last November covering Washington, Colorado, Iowa, Illnios and Ohio

Yep, I posted a list of the sites by cascade ID that are due microwave backhaul in the Premier sector of the forums.  If Robert would allow it to be posted in here I would copy and paste it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply. Yeah, they did that at the start of NV 1.0 in the Chicago market. Some of those sites sat finished but not activated for a long time. (Dekalb I believe was a year and a half or so). That was very unusual even with the issues they were having with work execution early on in NV 1.0. I was just wondering as 1.0 rolled on if they were quicker at lighting up the MW links.

 

Sent from my 831C using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/wireless/tds-telecom-to-launch-mobile-service-via-nctc-s-mvno Surprising given merger.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...