Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

I was just reading this article on Fiercewireless:

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-hopes-secure-much-5b-mortgaging-spectrum-and-network-gear/2016-03-02

 

And it made it sound pretty bad about the financial condition of Sprint having to borrow against itself?? Kind of confusing with how they are moving the debt around but nonetheless was concerned and wanted some feedback from the experts here just as I'm about to port over 2 lines over to Sprint next Friday 11th when the S7 Edge releases.

 

Is there any concern about Sprint not being able to pay it's debt payments coming due and having to liquidate spectrum (2500 Mhz) saying that their treasure trove of 2500 is worth 115 Billion!!?? to stay afloat?

Ok, if I am reading this correctly, Softbank is hedging its bets. If they fund Sprint and it folds, Softbank loses it investment. However, by setting up a subsidiary and loaning money to Sprint in return for collateral they are essentially making a secured loan. On the flip side, this may be helpful to Sprint also if the loans carry a significantly lower interest rate than their current debt. Eventually, they may be able to refinance that debt. Also of note, Japan currently has a negative interest rate for funds held by the central bank. This is to encourage banks to lend money rather than hoarding it. This set up may have also fueled this action by Softbank.

Then again, I could be totally off base  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes sense kinda of lol...... :) Anyhow I was just concerned when I saw that they are carrying $30 Billion in debt and 2.5 Billion is starting to come due!

 

Man I hope Sprint doesn't go under like Sears, Dish Network etc..... seem to be going towards? I want Sprint to succeed and be a healthy alternative for wireless consumers for many years to come :(

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

$30 billion of debt with a market cap of $15 billion is not the end of the world, especially if  Sprint turns profitable. Again the 2.5 billion due this year is not an issue if Sprint turns a profit. However, the $10 billion due in 2020 can be an issue if it cannot be refinanced or properly planned for. At this point, I have enough confidence that I continue to buy Sprint stock.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just reading this article on Fiercewireless:

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-hopes-secure-much-5b-mortgaging-spectrum-and-network-gear/2016-03-02

 

And it made it sound pretty bad about the financial condition of Sprint having to borrow against itself?? Kind of confusing with how they are moving the debt around but nonetheless was concerned and wanted some feedback from the experts here just as I'm about to port over 2 lines over to Sprint next Friday 11th when the S7 Edge releases.

 

Is there any concern about Sprint not being able to pay it's debt payments coming due and having to liquidate spectrum (2500 Mhz) saying that their treasure trove of 2500 is worth 115 Billion!!?? to stay afloat?

The new credit facility is good news!  Bankruptcy happens when a company runs out of cash to pay its daily bills and big loans coming due.  (Cash flow and cash position are key metrics that investors evaluate.)  The previous worry was that nobody was willing to keep giving Sprint money that they may never pay back. (No profit since 2006.)

 

As demonstrated, Softbank is an actual somebody that will keep feeding Sprint cash to live another day by whatever creative means necessary.  Thus, Sprint's stock has now risen from $2 to $3. :D

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I am sure the accountants, lawyers and actuaries have their reasons.

 

Several months ago, I had a discussion with others here on S4GRU about the renaming possibilities of Sprint, which included the idea of Softbank U.S., etc. The idea didn't sound good to some, because of how banks don't have a generally positive image here, which I agree with that thought. Yet since then, these media sources have continued to claim such horrors about Sprint's financial status, even while Sprint has made many efforts to improve this aspect. Meanwhile, Sprint needs more money to finance continued network improvements they get targeted for a bad network reputation.

 

I think it is unfair how Sprint is being put in this situation by the media, so any creative usage of what they do have in fighting this, should be useful for them. I'm glad to be hearing about some of those actions they are taking here on this site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps it would help Sprint if Softbank actually became a bank.

Banking/finance are already parts of Softbank's business.  Sprint is being helped by this.  That's the point of the news article.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new credit facility is good news!  Bankruptcy happens when a company runs out of cash to pay its daily bills and big loans coming due.  (Cash flow and cash position are key metrics that investors evaluate.)  The previous worry was that nobody was willing to keep giving Sprint money that they may never pay back. (No profit since 2006.)

 

As demonstrated, Softbank is an actual somebody that will keep feeding Sprint cash to live another day by whatever creative means necessary.  Thus, Sprint's stock has now risen from $2 to $3. :D

Didn't realize Sprint hasn't been profitable since 2006!! Yikes :blink: But I'm glad the stock has went up to $3 :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Banking/finance are already parts of Softbank's business.  Sprint is being helped by this.  That's the point of the news article.

 

I knew they were doing some banking activity, just not to the extent the article made clear. I'm glad to hear they are coming up with these creative ideas to help Sprint, along with of course the spectrum actions Sprint has been doing lately too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take it as SoftBank is currently an investor of Sprint. Which has rewards and risk involved. This new holding company will technically be a creditor of Sprint. So if Sprint goes belly up - SoftBank gets some relief. In turn this helps stabilize the rift back in Japan.

 

Also helps Sprint show ability to purchase new capital expenditures

 

 

At least that's what I read it as.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new credit facility is good news!  Bankruptcy happens when a company runs out of cash to pay its daily bills and big loans coming due.  (Cash flow and cash position are key metrics that investors evaluate.)  The previous worry was that nobody was willing to keep giving Sprint money that they may never pay back. (No profit since 2006.)

 

As demonstrated, Softbank is an actual somebody that will keep feeding Sprint cash to live another day by whatever creative means necessary.  Thus, Sprint's stock has now risen from $2 to $3. :D

 

 

SoftBank has not been feeding cash to Sprint at all. They have allowed them to borrow money. Contrast that with DT which forgave about $5B of the combined T-Mobile/Metro company debt.

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SoftBank has not been feeding cash to Sprint at all. They have allowed them to borrow money. Contrast that with DT which forgave about $5B of the combined T-Mobile/Metro company debt.

Cash is cash. Cash is king. Cash can be from debt. Cash can be from income (operations).  But ultimately, you need cash to keep the lights on everyday.  Without cash, you must immediately close down or declare bankruptcy.  Thus, cash flow and cash position are key metrics that business managers and investors evaluate.

 

Look no further than your wallet for how physical or digital cash is given to the cashier (mandatory) so you can buy stuff or get services.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cash is cash. Cash is king. Cash can be from debt. Cash can be from income (operations).  But ultimately, you need cash to keep the lights on everyday.  Without cash, you must immediately close down or declare bankruptcy.  Thus, cash flow and cash position are key metrics that business managers and investors evaluate.

 

Look no further than your wallet for how physical or digital cash is given to the cashier (mandatory) so you can buy stuff or get services.

 

Yeah, but one forgave debt so that T-Mobile can borrow more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Sprint have any sort of deadline for 800Mhz buildout? It seems so unreasonable to have nationwide 14mhz and still be behind one of the four carriers in terms of coverage. I know PCS G block deadline is coming up for Montana (hence why Cedar is making progress now.) I am curious if there's any sort of geographic requirements in the SMR spectrum.

 

That being said, I am glad Sprint is making efforts to allocate more usable spectrum in the PCS range. Some markets that are waiting for Nokia equipment should benefit greatly from the increase to 10x10 or 15x15 on B25.

Agreed, from the Columbus market and no 800 lte on the northern portion of the market and four 3g GMOs within 15 minutes of my house...

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't compare it to T-Mobile who's adding 700A on their legacy sites and calling it expansion.

Just to clarify, there is expansion happening, on both the 700 spectrum, as well as non 700 spectrum, mostly in Roam Over Build areas. Mostly dictated by if 700 is available to deploy on.

 

So while T-Mobile is expanding some of their footprint filling in some gaps and moving the boundary of the edge of service with L700, there is a ton of expansion in non-overlay projects as well.

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by reedacus25
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, there is expansion happening, on both the 700 spectrum, as well as non 700 spectrum, mostly in Roam Over Build areas. Mostly dictated by if 700 is available to deploy on.

 

So while T-Mobile is expanding some of their footprint filling in some gaps and moving the boundary of the edge of service with L700, there is a ton of expansion in non-overlay projects as well.

 

This is also the reason that Legere is so vocal about VoLTE being disabled during RootMetrics testing. It wouldn't make such a huge difference if they were simply overlaying L700 where they already had E1900.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is also the reason that Legere is so vocal about VoLTE being disabled during RootMetrics testing. It wouldn't make such a huge difference if they were simply overlaying L700 where they already had E1900.

With VoLTE now being tested by RootMetrics I suppose they'll just go back to their claim of RootMetrics being bought out by Verizon and publishing outdated results.
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So softbank is splitting into two companies one for is Japanese operations and another for its international subsidiaries.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2016/03/07/sprint-owner-softbank-splits-into-two-companies/81428468/

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So softbank is splitting into two companies one for is Japanese operations and another for its international subsidiaries.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2016/03/07/sprint-owner-softbank-splits-into-two-companies/81428468/

That should help prove that SoftBank isn't pulling out of sprint. At least not via logic.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This site is built but not live. eNB 41150 is still live. eNB 41188 is decommissioned but as far as I can tell the site at 200 West 55th is not built yet. This site is live gNB 1346302. This site is live gNB 1092074 This site is live gNB 1371671 This site is live gNB 1371860 — — — — — Sprint eNB 6156 -> T-Mobile gNB 1349260 Sprint eNB Unknown -> T-Mobile gNB 1325016 — — — — — Bonus T-Mobile 5G small cell, gNB 1348688 in Queens:  
    • FTTH JVs are city by city as well, so it's not going to really be sector by sector. It sounds like TMo wants to be able to sell everyone home broadband, but if that requires building additional infrastructure that infra will take the form of FTTH builds rather than mobile densification. Which involves tradeoffs, but the product is better than e.g. what AT&T is doing for me right now, which is offering only Internet Air in an area where they have 100/20 DSL available but not (yet) fiber.
    • Hopefully they do not wait until these sectors get so overloaded that they start getting nasty reviews and people abandon them. Getting fiber coverage to the area of a overloaded sector can take a year or more. I also question if this can all be managed.  Lots of sectors all over the country can get congested fairly quick.  Lots of work and money to get fiber installed and there goes the profitability on the venture.
    • MoffetNathanson Conference This is a conference where the CFO talks telecom financial analysts so obviously it takes a return on investment approach.  Broadly T-Mobile divides there world into top 100 markets (60%) and small town/rural (40%). They ultimately want to have at least 1/3 market share in rural. They also look at demographics like 50+ and Hispanic.  Reputation is now starting to help them with CIOs.  Did mention c-band buildout beginning in major cities as well as continued band migration to 5g. IMO they may become more aggressive at offering 5g phones to LTE holdover and 5g users without VoNR at a future date. mmWave not discussed. Price increases not discussed iirc. Did mention spectrum purchases from speculators. $9 billion all goes through same ROI process. FWA is down to hexagonal patterns by sector of fallow spectrum. Fiber JVs will go where sectors are overloaded.
    • I am lucky to be served by an excellent fiber ISP and that is the only reason I haven't tried TMOs FWA. Once you go fiber, it is REALLY hard to go back. The choice of sub-10ms ping times is a very artificial bucket, FWA will seldom get much below 10ms ping times but fiber regularly gets me 1-3ms ping times. Basically, at around those times, the speed of light and the distance you are from the server become the limiting factors. As an aside, my internet provider, ZiplyFiber, has been awesome. They peer like crazy at all the major IX in the area and, as a result, you end up with what essentially amounts to direct fiber connections to the vast majority of major data sources. While it isn't sexy, it makes my 1Gb/1Gb connection load pages significantly faster than my works 10Gb/10Gb connection. On the "sexy" side, they are also fastest ISP in the nation. They offer up to 50Gb/50Gb via a direct fiber connection to the router, albeit for an eye watering $900/mo.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...