Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Since March 31st I've noticed the WiMax sites here in Pittsburgh (ones that I drive past daily at least) are running 2 carrier B41. It can progress quickly if they want it to.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the launch of Carrier Aggregation has been one of Sprint's most successful deployment's in terms of timing. NYC saw a substantial increase in speed and stability in a matter of weeks after the Wimax shutdown. 

 

Hopefully this is a prelude to how Sprint will handle these things moving forward.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the launch of Carrier Aggregation has been one of Sprint's most successful deployment's in terms of timing. NYC saw a substantial increase in speed and stability in a matter of weeks after the Wimax shutdown. 

 

Hopefully this is a prelude to how Sprint will handle these things moving forward.

 

I agree. On top of this, John Saw and Gunther Offendorfer have previously said that the densification would not be disruptive to the customer experience. (in one of those Harrison Wiley Show videos)

 

This is much better than in the past when Sprint was selling the iPhone 5 which supported LTE and Sprint's LTE network wasn't deployed that widely.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since March 31st I've noticed the WiMax sites here in Pittsburgh (ones that I drive past daily at least) are running 2 carrier B41. It can progress quickly if they want it to.

Really? I didn't know the equipment in Pittsburgh could do a second carrier. Do you have a carrier aggregation capable phone? Just curious if that second carrier is accessible to those devices (third carrier on Sprint gear currently isn't since CA isn't enabled on it yet for some reason, so the device gets kicked off)

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? I didn't know the equipment in Pittsburgh could do a second carrier. Do you have a carrier aggregation capable phone? Just curious if that second carrier is accessible to those devices (third carrier on Sprint gear currently isn't since CA isn't enabled on it yet for some reason, so the device gets kicked off)

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

 

Pretty much most of the Samsung Clearwire equipment could support it, at least in this market (NY, NJ, CT)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marcelo stated on his Twitter that tomorrow he will go in dept on what he gathered from the listening tour he was on. Let's see how he applies what he was told and learned to sprint.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious if that second carrier is accessible to those devices (third carrier on Sprint gear currently isn't since CA isn't enabled on it yet for some reason, so the device gets kicked off)

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

I have an s7, no aggregation yet unfortunately. The site I know is fed by a small microwave and speed tops out at 23 down. In fact, I've not hit above 40 down on any site in the 'burgh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The site I know is fed by a small microwave...

 

Are you talking about me?  I frequently am fed by a small microwave.  Mostly, organic frozen meals and soups.

 

AJ

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an s7, no aggregation yet unfortunately. The site I know is fed by a small microwave and speed tops out at 23 down. In fact, I've not hit above 40 down on any site in the 'burgh.

 Are you talking clearwire? I didn't know clearwire B41 was live. Because Sprint B41² has been live for a while 72 that I have been to.

 

If you want to be sure to get 40+ down then come to connellsville 2xCA live and 50+ Mbps but I used to get those speeds before the second carrier went live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's actually closer to a 3, 4 or 5 month delay for the respective markets.

 

See the WiMAX Shutdown Schedule: http://www.mobilebeacon.org/wimax-shutdown/

 

This pushed everything back a few months at least.

 

True but I would pay ovt. Sprint can't afford to miss this target date. It would be another fail. Sprint is probably the only provider that would be held the exact time frame. Ever since Tmo came out and lit up Lte in such a short time frame no matter what sprint says it's considered an excuse and a badly run company. Marcelo needs to get this done after all he did say it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the delay of the WiMax shutdown, should we add a few months to Marcelo's timeline?

As someone who has spent a lot of time in IT working with regular old Joes that just want their computer to connect to the internet, I say no. Most regular people have to idea what the hell WiMAX is (was) and offering the whole WiMAX situation as an excuse to them is pointless. Most regular people just want things to work and they honestly couldn't care less how or why they work. On top of that, NGN was going to be the one thing that really improved sprints network before the end of the 18-24 months. As far as I know, the WiMAX hold up didn't affect NGN's timeline at all. NGN was about densifying and installing new small cells. Whether sprint has 40mhz of free spectrum or 60mhz of free spectrum doesn't affect their ability to install small cells. Yes, maybe lack of spectrum affects their ability to use them but that's all resolved now isn't it? And we're still pretty far away from the final date...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the RF telecom guy is showing a couple more spots where small cells are being deployed. Together with the Baltimore article and the MN article. It's safe to say that small cell deployment is moving forward in quite a few places.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this company going to buy the 600? Sounds like good news for sprint.

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-t-mobile-among-104-applicants-fccs-600-mhz-incentive-auction/2016-03-18

According to the list, Network LeaseCo is not on there and most likely not the one bidding for 600. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the RF telecom guy is showing a couple more spots where small cells are being deployed. Together with the Baltimore article and the MN article. It's safe to say that small cell deployment is moving forward in quite a few places.

Baltimore article?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

One thing I learned from that press release, is that the legal notifications regarding "Forward-Looking Statements" keeps getting longer with additional protective legal advisories in every subsequent press release I read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an s7, no aggregation yet unfortunately. The site I know is fed by a small microwave and speed tops out at 23 down. In fact, I've not hit above 40 down on any site in the 'burgh.

This sounds like the server is congested. When your testing, make sure to try different servers. Alot of times the nearest servers have the worst performance due to congestion, especially as more people run speedtest and leave it on the default server.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea the onus is on you, to call to get the credit which is $10 ( to mitigate the $30 activation fee) . Is it worth it to call numerous times, hoping to get the right rep and hoping to get a $10 credit from said rep? Who knows, that is up to the individual.

 

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

I haven't experienced anything like you described when purchasing a phone through Sprint, and requesting my activation fee be removed or refunded. I've bought plenty of Sprint devices since 2000.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't experienced anything like you described when purchasing a phone through Sprint, and requesting my activation fee be removed or refunded. I've bought plenty of Sprint devices since 2000.

I've done this almost every upgrade.  I call in, just ask if they can waive it and they did it 95% of the time, also saying "It's a one time thing since you've been a loyal Sprint customer." ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That article is almost a month old...things may have changed...

 

Wouldn't that be something if SoftBank bid on the Spectrum? I wouldn't put it past Masa/Marcelo to do something clever like this....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...