Jump to content

LTE Plus / Enhanced LTE (was "Sprint Spark" - Official Name for the Tri-Band Network)


Recommended Posts

but what about the nexus 6 and everything it supports...I'm really surprised (though it was after these plans) that it couldn't support it

 

The Nexus 6 supports B41, in 20mhz configuration, like almost every other device Sprint supports now.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Nexus 6 supports B41, in 20mhz configuration, like almost every other device Sprint supports now.

What about the Samsung Galaxy Mega?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about the Samsung Galaxy Mega?

That was one of the first devices to support Band 41 so definitely not.

 

First device to support Carrier Aggregation was the LG G flex 2, so from that point forward phones started supporting more than a single 20mhz carrier.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was one of the first devices to support Band 41 so definitely not.

 

First device to support Carrier Aggregation was the LG G flex 2, so from that point forward phones started supporting more than a single 20mhz carrier.

I think the Note 4 Edge was the first CA device.

 

Sent from my SM-T237P using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint now the fastest in Denver! Spark making headways!

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/denver-co

 

There be a lot of Spark in them foothills.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They had the fastest median downloads at 10.71 vs Tmo at 9.79.

Not sure where you're pulling those numbers from, but if you look at the speed index award, Verizon, T-Mobile, and Sprint are all tied. They are statistically too close to determine a clear winner.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure where you're pulling those numbers from, but if you look at the speed index award, Verizon, T-Mobile, and Sprint are all tied. They are statistically too close to determine a clear winner.

 

From the report:

 

Sprint recorded the fastest median download speed at 10.7 Mbps, while T-Mobile recorded the fastest median upload speed at 7.9 Mbps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile's median download speed is not reported anywhere on that page, yet he still gave a value for it.

Seems like he confused it with the median upload speed. However he was correct in saying that Sprint is the fastest in Denver.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like he confused it with the median upload speed. However he was correct in saying that Sprint is the fastest in Denver.

No, that is an incorrect statement.  They may have recorded the fastest median speed, but RootMetrics was unable to statistically separate Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile to determine a clear winner for the speed metric.  Sprint is TIED for the fastest provider in Denver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure where you're pulling those numbers from, but if you look at the speed index award, Verizon, T-Mobile, and Sprint are all tied. They are statistically too close to determine a clear winner.

 

towards the top right of the screen if you click on the link called "how RootScores are calculated" it will open a window that shows the median download and upload speeds for everyone along with the blocked/dropped calls and text data. that will be specific to denver and clicking that same link at any other city/report will give you the data specific to that report.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, that is an incorrect statement.  They may have recorded the fastest median speed, but RootMetrics was unable to statistically separate Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile to determine a clear winner for the speed metric.  Sprint is TIED for the fastest provider in Denver.

 

IT IS NOT AN INCORRECT STATEMENT.  According to RootMetrics report, Sprint beat out T-Mobile in download speeds.  Period!  Get off your semantics and deal with it, man!

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

towards the top right of the screen if you click on the link called "how RootScores are calculated" it will open a window that shows the median download and upload speeds for everyone along with the blocked/dropped calls and text data. that will be specific to denver and clicking that same link at any other city/report will give you the data specific to that report.

 

Thanks, I was unaware of that.  Both T-Mobile and Sprint show very large margins on their data speed charts.  Another round of testing could swing it either way

 

IT IS NOT AN INCORRECT STATEMENT.  According to RootMetrics report, Sprint beat out T-Mobile in download speeds.  Period!  Get off your semantics and deal with it, man!

It's not semantics, it's statistics  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, I was unaware of that.

 

It's not semantics, it's statistics  ;)

 

no problem :) it took me forever to find that you could pull that up and see the median speeds for everyone. It was always annoying that on some reports they would list out the speeds and on others they wouldn't. until i found that link anyway :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no problem :) it took me forever to find that you could pull that up and see the median speeds for everyone. It was always annoying that on some reports they would list out the speeds and on others they wouldn't. until i found that link anyway :D

Yeah I found that strange as well.  Can't believe I went all this time without knowing!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, that is an incorrect statement.  They may have recorded the fastest median speed, but RootMetrics was unable to statistically separate Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile to determine a clear winner for the speed metric.  Sprint is TIED for the fastest provider in Denver.

Ok go back to the report. Click on "How RootScores are calculated". That is where I obtained them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, I was unaware of that.

 

It's not semantics, it's statistics  ;)

 

Yes, suck on the statistic that says that Sprint had the highest download speed of them all.  That is a statistic.  And yes, RootMetrics also combines the upload speeds and creates a metric that shows a tie.  That's just another statistic.  But to try to claim that Sprint did not win in download just makes you look like an ass.

 

 

Sprint recorded the fastest median download speed at 10.7 Mbps
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, see the few posts above :) didn't even know that existed until today.

That to me is the best part of the reports. Median smoothing statistically is the best part.  It gives a general view of the data access noted throughout the testing period.  I don't like to look at a bar that says "91" or "78" or whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, suck on the statistic that says that Sprint had the highest download speed of them all.  That is a statistic.  And yes, RootMetrics also combines the upload speeds and creates a metric that shows a tie.  That's just another statistic.  But to try to claim that Sprint did not win in download just makes you look like an ass.

So variances don't matter then... 

 

Screenshot from 2015-04-09 15:07:51.png

 

T-Mobile, Sprint, and Verizon all fall within each other's margins of error, so there's no clear speed winner here, hence the 3-way tie.  You could test all the networks again within a week and it could swing back to T-Mobile or Verizon recording the fastest median.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...