Jump to content

Google Nexus 5 by LG Preview (LG D820)


MacinJosh

Recommended Posts

In the leaked video of the Nexus 5, you briefly see that the phone is indeed connected to Google Services, before the bartender starts messing with the lockscreen. Also, it looks like the non-removable battery will be sub-par, as the device has (I think) 2% remaining and obviously needs to be charged. Not sure if its 4:30am or 4:30pm, but if its 4:30am then that's an extra 12 hours of battery life (assuming the device was not charging intermittently throughout the day. In any case, the engineer is an alcoholic (if it's 4:30pm he left work early to start drinking, and if its 4:30am he's been drinking all night long, lol).

 

ARDpfU7.jpg

I definitely would not draw any conclusions about the battery from these 3 second videos. People's charging habits differ widely, and this is almost certainly a preproduction prototype. When you say it's connected to Google Services, what do you mean aside from the phone having an Internet connection?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just saying it as a comparison, you're right the screen will obviously be the biggest culprit. But the Nexus 7 (2013) has a 1920x1200 resolution screen, but it still has great battery life.

 

If the software can reduce battery usage, then the screen should be no problem.

 

 

-Luis

 

The larger the battery, the more efficiently the device draws current under load. If you swap out a 2000mAh battery with a 4000mAh battery, you will see more than twice the battery life. The same is if you swap out that 2000mAh battery with a 1000mAh battery: you will get substantially less than half the battery time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I definitely would not draw any conclusions about the battery from these 3 second videos. People's charging habits differ widely, and this is almost certainly a preproduction prototype. When you say it's connected to Google Services, what do you mean aside from the phone having an Internet connection?

 

I didn't draw any conclusions, I am just making some educated guesses based on the small amount of intel at hand. I made the comment about connecting to Google Services after reading comments in another forum that said the phone wasn't connecting to Google Services because the network icon was white, so some people missed the few frames in the beginning that showed otherwise. You can also see the roaming icon in the videos, but what that means, if anything, is beyond me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe people don't understand this yet. Even the Android blogs got confused by this. :td:

 

I don't think its weird that tech blogs gets confused by this.  Until the LG G2 and Moto X, all the Android smartphones besides the Nexus phone series have always had capacitive buttons outside of the screen and not onscreen buttons so the resolution was always listed as the full 1920x1080.  Only if you want to get technical do you start subtracting the real estate from the onscreen buttons and the status bar(really?????) that you get that obscure resolution number of 1794x1080. 

 

I don't think its weird at all and to be honest, most folks would rather just have the specs list the resolution of the full screen regardless of the space taken up by the onscreen buttons and status bar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The larger the battery, the more efficiently the device draws current under load. If you swap out a 2000mAh battery with a 4000mAh battery, you will see more than twice the battery life. The same is if you swap out that 2000mAh battery with a 1000mAh battery: you will get substantially less than half the battery time. 

No shit Sherlock.

Talk about pointing out the obvious  :rofl:

 

I think your reading way too much into a brief video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The real gas guzzler is the 5", IPS, backlit LCD panel running at 1080 x 1920. Ain't so software that can reduce that power consumption!

Actually there is! According to Arstechnica (http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/09/lgs-g2-smartphone-gets-caught-living-in-the-shadows-of-giants/2/ ) the LG G2 manages just fine:

"One of the more interesting additions to the G2 is a battery saving trick called "panel self refresh." PSR works by including a small amount of graphics RAM, and when the screen isn't changing, the phone will save the static image to the graphics RAM and shut down the GPU. The biggest power usage in a phone is always the display, but every little bit counts."

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Nexus 4 had a 2100 maH battery so I didn't follow the Nexus 4 that much but I assume it had good battery life.

My Nexus 4 has pretty crummy battery life. Worst battery life of any phone I've had since GS2.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Nexus 4 has pretty crummy battery life. Worst battery life of any phone I've had since GS2.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4

 

So do you have much faith that the rumored 2300 maH battery in the Nexus 5 would be suffice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Nexus 4 has pretty crummy battery life. Worst battery life of any phone I've had since GS2.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4

 

This would worry me greatly, but, as partially quoted above from Ars, this phone is based on the G2, which apparently is getting good battery life...

 

The G2 is going to be the basis for the next Nexus device, so this hardware is of particular interest.

 

...

 

The battery life is great. It lasted 11 and a half hours in our battery test, which continually loads a series of webpages every 15 seconds until the phone dies. The screen stays on the entire time. One of the more interesting additions to the G2 is a battery saving trick called "panel self refresh." PSR works by including a small amount of graphics RAM, and when the screen isn't changing, the phone will save the static image to the graphics RAM and shut down the GPU. The biggest power usage in a phone is always the display, but every little bit counts.

 

 

11.5 hours with the screen on!? The G2 is has a 3000 mAh battery, so if the same tricks are used in the Nexus and the hardware is similar, the Nexus' 2300 mAh battery should last 8.8 hours with the screen continuously on. Keep in mind the Nexus 5's screen will actually be smaller. Not too shabby.

 

AnandTech did a solid, in-depth explanation of PSR, and it looks to have the potential to really help out with battery life. Let's hope is makes it to the Nexus 5.

 

I'll also add that AnandTech was absolutely amazed by the G2's battery life, which bodes well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only that but you have to factor in not just the software but the hardware as well.  The Nexus 7 (2012) and Nexus 7 (2013) is not an apples to apples comparison.  The Nexus 7 (2012) had the Tegra 3 chip built on 40 nm die size with Cortex-A9 vs. Nexus 7 (2013) had Qualcomm S600 chip built on 28 nm LP (low power) die size with Cortex-A15 cortex.  The 28nm chip is going to use a lot less power than the 40 nm chip.

 

The Nexus 4 had a 2100 maH battery so I didn't follow the Nexus 4 that much but I assume it had good battery life.

 

Nexus 4 was good when in idle, but as Robert said above it is horrible when using data such as youtube, web browsing. The high resolution will hurt battery life but how is the Snapdragon S4 Pro in the Nexus 4 vs. the Snapdragon 800 in terms of power consumption? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would worry me greatly, but, as partially quoted above from Ars, this phone is based on the G2, which apparently is getting good battery life...

 

 

11.5 hours with the screen on!? The G2 is has a 3000 mAh battery, so if the same tricks are used in the Nexus and the hardware is similar, the Nexus' 2300 mAh battery should last 8.8 hours with the screen continuously on. Keep in mind the Nexus 5's screen will actually be smaller. Not too shabby.

 

AnandTech did a solid, in-depth explanation of PSR, and it looks to have the potential to really help out with battery life. Let's hope is makes it to the Nexus 5.

 

I'll also add that AnandTech was absolutely amazed by the G2's battery life, which bodes well.

 

What type of screen is the Nexus 5 rumored to have? The HTC One in my opinion is a little disappointing when it comes to battery life. I have noticed WiFi drains the ONE more than leaving it on 3g or 4g.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think its weird that tech blogs gets confused by this.  Until the LG G2 and Moto X, all the Android smartphones besides the Nexus phone series have always had capacitive buttons outside of the screen and not onscreen buttons so the resolution was always listed as the full 1920x1080.  Only if you want to get technical do you start subtracting the real estate from the onscreen buttons and the status bar(really?????) that you get that obscure resolution number of 1794x1080. 

 

I don't think its weird at all and to be honest, most folks would rather just have the specs list the resolution of the full screen regardless of the space taken up by the onscreen buttons and status bar.

 

Also keep in mind that when watching a video the on screen buttons go away and it becomes the listed 1920x1080.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What type of screen is the Nexus 5 rumored to have? The HTC One in my opinion is a little disappointing when it comes to battery life. I have noticed WiFi drains the ONE more than leaving it on 3g or 4g.

 

Haven't seen rumors on the screen technology specifically; hoping they carry over whatever they used in the G2 because its screen has been widely praised. The Nexus 4's screen was a shared component with the OG. In this case, the Nexus 5's screen is rumored to be 5" while the G2's is 5.2", so it can't be a shared component if the rumors are true. Doesn't mean the technology can't be the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also keep in mind that when watching a video the on screen buttons go away and it becomes the listed 1920x1080.

 

I see.  I just wish they would just announce the screen resolution of the phone as what you would use in apps.  I mean like who cares what the screen resolution is on the home screen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would worry me greatly, but, as partially quoted above from Ars, this phone is based on the G2, which apparently is getting good battery life...

 

 

11.5 hours with the screen on!? The G2 is has a 3000 mAh battery, so if the same tricks are used in the Nexus and the hardware is similar, the Nexus' 2300 mAh battery should last 8.8 hours with the screen continuously on. Keep in mind the Nexus 5's screen will actually be smaller. Not too shabby.

 

AnandTech did a solid, in-depth explanation of PSR, and it looks to have the potential to really help out with battery life. Let's hope is makes it to the Nexus 5.

 

I'll also add that AnandTech was absolutely amazed by the G2's battery life, which bodes well.

 

This sounds very impressive.  11.5 hours of the screen ON consistently while loading a webpage every 15 seconds  :w00t: .  I wonder if this is result of the GRAM that LG has touted about which they say saves processor power.  This is even more of a reason to get the LG G2.  I am curious if LG/Google will add this same battery saving functionality to the Nexus 5. 

 

If you are LG, why the hell would you do this if it works so well on the LG G2.  I mean this could definitely get you more market share once more and more people throw out more reviews that boast the LG G2 battery life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see.  I just wish they would just announce the screen resolution of the phone as what you would use in apps.  I mean like who cares what the screen resolution is on the home screen.

 

Wouldn't that be the same minus a little for the apps that use boarders? I am sure app developers try to optimize their apps to give the best image.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't that be the same minus a little for the apps that use boarders? I am sure app developers try to optimize their apps to give the best image.

 

No no I am arguing that the phone specs should read that the resolution of the Nexus 5 is 1920x1080 instead of the actual 1794x1080 resolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EVDO roaming shouldn't be a problem at all, although whether or not Sprint permits it in the PRL is a separate issue.

 

LTE roaming I think has to be programmed into the SIM. Theoretically Sprint has reciprocal LTE roaming with CSpire and a few others, but I doubt they'll enable it simply because you'd go through your roaming limit in a few seconds.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt they'll enable it simply because you'd go through your roaming limit in a few seconds.

 

 

Especially when you consider new plans have 100MB roaming limit.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EVDO roaming shouldn't be a problem at all, although whether or not Sprint permits it in the PRL is a separate issue.

 

LTE roaming I think has to be programmed into the SIM. Theoretically Sprint has reciprocal LTE roaming with CSpire and a few others, but I doubt they'll enable it simply because you'd go through your roaming limit in a few seconds.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4

Especially when you consider new plans have 100MB roaming limit.

 

Robert

 

So it sounds like LTE isn't gonna happen. Have recent Sprint PRLs for similar phones allowed for roaming on Verizon's EV-DO recently?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it sounds like LTE isn't gonna happen. Have recent Sprint PRLs for similar phones allowed for roaming on Verizon's EV-DO recently?

You can with corporate accounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Especially when you consider new plans have 100MB roaming limit.

 

Robert

 

Maybe in the future LTE roaming will be throttled to something like 1mbps? That way you can't burn through your limit, but you still get to keep the latency benefits of LTE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...