Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note 3


linhpham2

Recommended Posts

It was either that or the current BlackBerry at the time, but it was out of stock and T-Mobile wanted to charge a higher monthly rate for it and being in school, I didn't want to sink my food and gas money into a BlackBerry. I actually sold my Wing on Craigslist and made profit and my manager gave me his old Nokia flip phone while he switched to AT&T to get the first iPhone when it came out.

 

The concept of handwriting notes seems cool, but I wonder if it works as well as Samsung makes it out to be, then why doesn't anyone else attempt to release their own version of the S pen?

 

They also improved the software behind it. Yesterday, I needed to write down a new number and input it in my contacts. Instead of having to go into my contacts and various menus to add and save their info I just pulled out my s pen and wrote their info down. This information can then be sent to your contacts list. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They also improved the software behind it. Yesterday, I needed to write down a new number and input it in my contacts. Instead of having to go into my contacts and various menus to add and save their info I just pulled out my s pen and wrote their info down. This information can then be sent to your contacts list.

 

That's pretty cool. I remember watching the demo video for the Note 3 and being impressed. If it were available in tri-band, I probably would have gotten one instead of the G2. Unfortunately for Samsung, there are active band 41 towers in my town and there is no way I could justify losing out in the whole tri-band experience.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The audio issues with the Note 3 are a bit disconcerting to me.  I don't understand how this was not figured out prior to release.  It makes me kinda glad that I did not pick up the Note 3.  But then again its hard to say that in hindsight given that the Note 3 was single band LTE and it made it a very easy choice for me to get the G2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hoping the pink Note 3 will be triband when it's announced next month (per Samsung rep at Best Buy). Regardless, I'll be getting a black one for mom and a pink one for the wifey. :)

 

I returned my black AT&T Note 3 yesterday. It was cool playing with it for the first 2-3 days but I got bored with it. My S4 is just as fast and more customizable thanks to easy root and multiple Xposed modules. And easier to handle one-handed and to pocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've tried, but I cannot replicate the call quality problems. I've put in 2,000 minutes on my note 3 so far, but all calls have been crystal clear. All my calls originate from the KC area and have landed to all other carriers in various places in the U.S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there any Sprint Note 3 users in Orange County, CA with call issues? I'm gonna be getting 2 Note 3's come January. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there any Sprint Note 3 users in Orange County, CA with call issues? I'm gonna be getting 2 Note 3's come January. :)

Well I was there two weeks ago for the OC car show and made a couple of calls with no issues.

 

Sent from my L.A. Cellular phone.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hoping the pink Note 3 will be triband when it's announced next month (per Samsung rep at Best Buy). Regardless, I'll be getting a black one for mom and a pink one for the wifey. :)

 

I returned my black AT&T Note 3 yesterday. It was cool playing with it for the first 2-3 days but I got bored with it. My S4 is just as fast and more customizable thanks to easy root and multiple Xposed modules. And easier to handle one-handed and to pocket.

 

You better be praying hard and sacrificing a lamb if you expect a pink color to all of a sudden contain triband LTE support.  Samsung and Sprint are done with hardware modifications to the phone.  All Samsung and Sprint will do at this point is just make maintenance and upgrade software updates.  There is no precedent of any smartphone ever where a later release of a new color of the phone caused a change in the internals of the device.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You better be praying hard and sacrificing a lamb if you expect a pink color to all of a sudden contain triband LTE support. Samsung and Sprint are done with hardware modifications to the phone. All Samsung and Sprint will do at this point is just make maintenance and upgrade software updates. There is no precedent of any smartphone ever where a later release of a new color of the phone caused a change in the internals of the device.

I knew my wording would be confusing for some. The November release date comment was only for the pink, not triband. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew my wording would be confusing for some. The November release date comment was only for the pink, not triband. :P

 

Haha..yeah your post is confusing since you talked about an AT&T Note 3 yesterday so I assume you are on AT&T.  If so then why would triband even be an issue in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went into Best Buy today and played around with the GN3 that phone is absolutely amazing. I love everything about the phone except the fact that it doesn't have tri band. I wish we had the one up program in Florida because I would definitely purchase this phone then upgrade to the GN4 next year. Any phone is better than the Evo LTE at least in the RF dept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha..yeah your post is confusing since you talked about an AT&T Note 3 yesterday so I assume you are on AT&T. If so then why would triband even be an issue in the first place.

Sorry for the confusion. :) I'm a Sprint subscriber but I signed a 2-yr deal with AT&T to try out the Note 3. My plan was to try out the size to see whether it was compatible with me. I wanted to ''live'' with the phone to get the full experience as opposed to playing with a tied-down store model or briefly playing with a friend's.

 

I also wanted to have mom & wifey try it out b/c they both have interest (they currently own a E4GT).

 

The reason I went with AT&T is because I already have 5 lines total under my Sprint account & adding a sixth line would've changed my plan permanently & increase my bill. :P.

 

AT&T was chosen over Verizon and T-Mobile b/c my corporate discount waives the activation fee and gives a 23% discount.

 

In the end, I used the Note 3 for 11 days before returning at Best Buy (no restocking fee).

 

Now I just have to pay for the 11 days of usage. :)

 

Come January, mom will be gifted a black Note 3 and wifey will buy a pink Note 3, if what the Samsung rep said was correct. :D

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for the confusion. :) I'm a Sprint subscriber but I signed a 2-yr deal with AT&T to try out the Note 3. My plan was to try out the size to see whether it was compatible with me. I wanted to ''live'' with the phone to get the full experience as opposed to playing with a tied-down store model or briefly playing with a friend's.

 

I also wanted to have mom & wifey try it out b/c they both have interest (they currently own a E4GT).

 

The reason I went with AT&T is because I already have 5 lines total under my Sprint account & adding a sixth line would've changed my plan permanently & increase my bill. :P.

 

AT&T was chosen over Verizon and T-Mobile b/c my corporate discount waives the activation fee and gives a 23% discount.

 

In the end, I used the Note 3 for 11 days before returning at Best Buy (no restocking fee).

 

Now I just have to pay for the 11 days of usage. :)

 

Come January, mom will be gifted a black Note 3 and wifey will buy a pink Note 3, if what the Samsung rep said was correct. :D

 

This is why devices cost so much.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why devices cost so much.

I doubt it. If Sprint didn't change the plans on me after introducing the One Up program, I would've just opened up a 6th line.

 

More importantly, I discovered through real-world usage that the Note 3 isn't compatible with me.

 

And there are hundreds and thousands of other products out there that cost more than a Note 3 where consumers have a 30 days return protection on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw on Youtube you can kind of bump the  screen over to a side and shrink it town to a one hand size. How does that work out in use? I hope they put that in the next 2 update too.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw on Youtube you can kind of bump the screen over to a side and shrink it town to a one hand size. How does that work out in use? I hope they put that in the next 2 update too.

 

It's a setting one can activate in Settings. Once turned on, one uses a swipe gesture to activate. It took me some tries to get used to it but it works rather well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow just saw this on Twitter. Check out @sprintcare's Tweet: https://twitter.com/sprintcare/status/391735974381621248 basically a sprint care rep telling people that note 3 will support 800 and 1900? Did I miss something or are they giving out bad info?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow just saw this on Twitter. Check out @sprintcare's Tweet: https://twitter.com/sprintcare/status/391735974381621248 basically a sprint care rep telling people that note 3 will support 800 and 1900? Did I miss something or are they giving out bad info?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

Unless I really missed something in that tweet I would assume that they are talking about voice and not lte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I really missed something in that tweet I would assume that they are talking about voice and not lte.

Check out @sprintcare's Tweet: https://twitter.com/sprintcare/status/392020002091450368 the way its worded is very misleading then. To me its reads it will work on both voice and data on 800 and 1900. Either way just sharing I trust the info on here more than there.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check out @sprintcare's Tweet: https://twitter.com/sprintcare/status/392020002091450368 the way its worded is very misleading then. To me its reads it will work on both voice and data on 800 and 1900. Either way just sharing I trust the info on here more than there.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

Oh ok LOL, well it definitely looks like they are saying that it supports lte on 800 but we already know that's not the case. Someone needs to call them out on that tweet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check out @sprintcare's Tweet: https://twitter.com/sprintcare/status/392020002091450368 the way its worded is very misleading then. To me its reads it will work on both voice and data on 800 and 1900. Either way just sharing I trust the info on here more than there.Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

You can get voice and data on the 800 mhz frequency, as long as you don't mind checking your email on 1x...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the Note 3 does support EV-DO 800.  Sprint just has not and will not deploy it.

 

Additionally, far too many sources confuse Cellular 850 MHz with SMR 800 MHz.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...