Jump to content

Sprint TD-LTE 2500/2600mhz Discussion


Recommended Posts

Can LTE Broadcast be used for Netflix and other streaming content? Or even Slingplayer? I use both program fairly often

 

It might be possible for the highly in demand shows on Netflix, but there are way too many shows and movies on there to do it for all of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Easy to miss. Nothing was put on the main page about it.

 

Yes, The Wall has become neglected.  After a year and a half of writing for all of you, Robert and I both have developed severe cases of carpal tunnel syndrome.  In fact, I now have to create my posts in The Forums the "Stephen Hawking way."

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, The Wall has become neglected.  After a year and a half of writing for all of you, Robert and I both have developed severe cases of carpal tunnel syndrome.  In fact, I now have to create my posts in The Forums the "Stephen Hawking way."

 

AJ

 

Is that because of carpal tunnel syndrome, or because it's really hard to type while wearing your straitjacket?  And then from a slightly different thread, there's the question of whether 2500 LTE is actually usable inside a room with rubber walls?  :lol:

 

(Sorry, I just couldn't resist!)

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that because of carpal tunnel syndrome, or because it's really hard to type while wearing your straitjacket? And then from a slightly different thread, there's the question of whether 2500 LTE is actually usable inside a room with rubber walls? :lol:

 

(Sorry, I just couldn't resist!)

Rubber is wonderful for rf propagation. Low conductivity.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, The Wall has become neglected.  After a year and a half of writing for all of you, Robert and I both have developed severe cases of carpal tunnel syndrome.  In fact, I now have to create my posts in The Forums the "Stephen Hawking way."

 

AJ

Na the wall is great, and I do appreciate all the hard work that goes into the articles. I just think when something fairly big like the change  in plans to add 2600 everywhere a little note there would be nice. Doesn't happen very often and a single sentence could pass on the news. Something like "In a conference call Sprint confirmed 2500/2600 will be added to most all NV sites, you can read all about it in the 2500 thread here...." A down side would be knocking the excellent PRL article down and that might get missed.

 

My opinion is just that an opinion. I don't know how much work it takes to do a wall entry. I don't know if there is a plan for what the wall should be for and what is not wall worthy etc.  

 

The funny thing is I always pictured AJ soundling like Steven Hawking  anyway. :P <joking>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rubber is wonderful for rf propagation. Low conductivity.

Off topic not all rubber is the same, some have a lot of carbon and heat up in a microwave.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My apologies if this has been discussed already, but as this thread is nearing a thousand posts, I haven't been able to review each and every one of them. Anyway, I was doing a little reading on LTE Broadcast and from this layman's point of view, it seems pretty interesting.

 

http://www.fiercebroadbandwireless.com/special-reports/lte-broadcast-gets-ready-its-close

http://www.fiercebroadbandwireless.com/special-reports/lte-broadcast-multiple-use-cases

http://www.fiercebroadbandwireless.com/special-reports/lte-broadcast-operators-hopping-board

http://www.fiercebroadbandwireless.com/special-reports/lte-broadcast-mixed-takes-future

 

Two Network Vision vendors, Ericsson and Alcatel-Lucent, are working with Qualcomm to develop the technology. Verizon has shown the most interest of any US carrier. However, I think that this technology is now tailor made for Sprint's forthcoming TD-LTE network given their Clearwire purchase. With their tremendous spectrum depth and cell site density, now that they've announced that they're going to put 2.5GHz on all ~39K and beyond, Sprint has a great opportunity to offer differentiating services depending on how the technology develops. It'll be interesting to see if Sprint pursues this and who they might partner with.

I think sprint should partner with Dish on this.????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I can pick up band 41 LTE in Orange County with my MiFi 500.  :tu: Euclid and W. Broadway in Anaheim. I didn't detect any in Fountain Valley by the Fry's, which is definitely in the Clear WiMAX coverage area. They may have concentrated more on LA and north OC for their initial rollout.

 

LTE
IMSI: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Connection State: Connected
PLMN ID: 875639091
Band:
[0] type:LTE band:E_UTRA_OPERATING_BAND_41 channel:40978
RSRP: -95 dBm
RSRQ: -8 dB
RS-SINR: 12.8 dB
Tx Power: 11.2 dBm
APN: r.ispsn
IPv4 Address: 0.0.0.0
IPv6 Address: N/A
IPv4 Call Last Error Code:
IPv6 Call Last Error Code: WDS_CER_UNSPECIFIED_V01

 

 

Speed test over WiFi:

 

2893094390.png

 

Direct over USB:

 

2893097261.png

 

EDIT: used the correct image for the direct test.

  • Like 21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realized after making the above post that the MiFi was probably preferring band 25 over 41, so it's possible 2600 is on more towers than I found through my very brief visit to OC/LA. I'll have to get my MSL sometime and see if I can change the preference order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my triband tests, speeds did go down when you went inside if you were more than 1/2 mile from the site. However, even with one bar, I still was getting 7-20Mbps on TD-LTE 2600. I even hit 18Mbps with a -120dBm RSRP signal in one test. Also note that my best speed test of all was taken inside my hotel room.In Thornton, Colorado I did testing of where TD-LTE 2600 overlapped Sprint LTE 1900 and the TD-LTE had better results in most instances. Only when the Band 25 exceeded a -80dBm signal and the Band 41 was worse than -115dBm did it get better to be on LTE 1900 Band 25.Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

I know there's no definitive answer to this question, but I live about 2.75 miles from the nearest tower. Can I expect to pick up LTE on 2.5 ghz? I get a decent 3G signal being this far away (usually between -80 and -85).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I picked up Band 41 in Queens over the weekend :D Didn't get a chance to run some speedtests, but there is active coverage there. I used the MSL on my Zing to change my priority to 41, 25, 26.

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I picked up Band 41 in Queens over the weekend :D Didn't get a chance to run some speedtests, but there is active coverage there. I used the MSL on my Zing to change my priority to 41, 25, 26.

Now I know why we aren't discovering 800 lte coverage.

 

I wish you all would set the priority to 26, 41, 25. So you see SMR first then BRS then PCS.

 

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I know why we aren't discovering 800 lte coverage.

 

I wish you all would set the priority to 26, 41, 25. So you see SMR first then BRS then PCS.

 

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 2

 

I dunno, I'd prefer that my devices keep off 800 unless they absolutely need to since there's way more spectrum in the higher bands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And your age!

 

Ummm, I definitely was not born in 1996.  Nor did I graduate in 1996.  But it does show the year I was married.  ;)

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno, I'd prefer that my devices keep off 800 unless they absolutely need to since there's way more spectrum in the higher bands.

 

Not to mention 2600 has better performance.  I was getting 10-20Mbps on TD-LTE 2600 sometimes even with zero bars.  Signal quality was everything on TDD-LTE.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • May 1st security update installed on s24 ultra factory unlocked. No functional changes detected.
    • Quote from wsj; "The T-Mobile deal could be reached as soon as later this month, while discussions with Verizon on a separate transaction are expected to take longer or might not result in an agreement, the people said." "The rising value of wireless licenses is a driving force behind the deal. U.S. Cellular’s spectrum portfolio touches 30 states and covers about 51 million people, according to regulatory filings." https://specmap.sequence-omega.net/
    • From WSJ which is paywalled but they're reporting that T-Mobile and Verizon are working on a joint deal to buy and split up U.S. Cellular. https://www.wsj.com/business/telecom/t-mobile-verizon-in-talks-to-carve-up-u-s-cellular-46d1e5e6?st=qwngrnh4s3bcr76 — — — — —  Summary from a user in the Reddit thread:  
    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...