Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - New Orleans Market


Slimboutit

Recommended Posts

There is a question I've been wanted to ask, over the years verizon and at&t have been building their lte network. Its like sprint just sat back and watch, I wonder why they waited so long and now they have to play catch up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a question I've been wanted to ask, over the years verizon and at&t have been building their lte network. Its like sprint just sat back and watch, I wonder why they waited so long and now they have to play catch up.

Sprint had WIMAX but it didn't succeed as they had hopped, then their deal with lightsquear to build their LTE failed so they had to make their own LTE network and Sprint doesn't have the resources Verizon and AT&T have, and sadly they don't make really good decisions (Nextel is one example)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a question I've been wanted to ask, over the years verizon and at&t have been building their lte network. Its like sprint just sat back and watch, I wonder why they waited so long and now they have to play catch up.

 

They didn't sit back and watch, they have been planning this out almost since Verizon first started deploying LTE. That was about the time it was starting to become obvious that Clear and WiMax wasn't going to work out as they had hoped. It takes a long time to plan out a complete network overhaul. This has been years in the making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can look at it how you want but I am glad to see them do it right instead of just bolting on one piece and running. I am really glad to see Sprint swap out everything to new tech.

 

Sent from a little old Note 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But man it makes it so hard to walk out of my front door every morning,look over at that new tech (yes the tower is that close) and look down at my phone to see 3G,run a speed test and get under 50kbps. Just turn it on already.Ill be more than happy to alpha,beta,whatevera test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are they taking so long to turn on the upgraded towers? I know there are regulations and stuff but it's been a long time since they finished the upgrade.

 

Could be many things. Backhaul not ready. Core not ready for us. It's not as simple as just slap up some new panels and rock and roll. They actually want it to work and want to minimize passing anyone off.

 

Sent from a little old Note 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just passed by 10 Westbank sites on the way home. Bupkis, nuthin, zilch, zero. Only Westwego and Belle Chasse have NV gear to my knowledge. Didn't hit the two on backside of Baratatia, maybe ill pass there tomorrow after the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok so I finally brought my good camera out to my (being rebuilt) house in laplace. These are images of the tower on I-10 close to hwy 51.

 

 

The new panels.

IMG_6684.JPG

 

 

 

 

One more view of the panels...

IMG_6687.JPG

 

 

 

 

And another from underneath

IMG_6693.JPG

 

 

 

 

And here are the boxes, there are 2 others but I believe these are the new ones.

IMG_6691.JPG

 

 

I have about 6 more pics like these if any more pics are wanted by anyone.

 

This location was flooded by hurricane Isaac and I believe that is the main reason why this tower has been upgraded. Previously the data speeds on this tower were terrible and it hardly ever got any attention. Now the speeds are significantly better but I have not been able to pick up anything other than 3g up to this point.

 

I was trying hard the other day as when I drove by there was a truck sitting by the entrance to the site (think it was an Ericson truck) but nada.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woohoo another crazy person taking zoomed in pics of panels. I have tons of pictures of sites before they got upgraded too.

 

Even after all these pictures we still have people saying they don't know what to look for.

 

I am really surprised we haven't had more New Orleans sitings.

 

 

 

Sent from a little old Note 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite possibly. Not sure about the GPRS as Sprint does not have any GPRS roaming in the US that I am aware of.

 

Sent from a little old Note 2

 

Lately at home (like right now) my usual 2-3 bars of Sprint 3G switches to 5 bars of Extended 3G and sometimes GPRS. I wonder if this has anything to do with upgrades..

 

Coo22 must be thinking of the 1x data circle. It's for 2G data. 1xRTT on CDMA carriers, and GPRS on GSM carriers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coo22 must be thinking of the 1x data circle. It's for 2G data. 1xRTT on CDMA carriers, and GPRS on GSM carriers.

Quite possibly. Not sure about the GPRS as Sprint does not have any GPRS roaming in the US that I am aware of.

 

Sent from a little old Note 2

 

Yes! Sorry about that. Couldn't think of what it was called.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the network vision cities list, it has always said anticipated launch jan. 2013. So are they testing in jan. or will we see testing before December ends.

 

Not sure. They have been delayed a bit though since that press release came out.

 

Sent from a little old Note 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spotted some NV gear at the site on Old Hammond close to Flannery. I took the photos with my phone, but you can definitely see the new panels. I can't wait till some LTE gets turned on!

 

qudu9e8a.jpg

 

de7aqeva.jpg

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very cool! Nice find! Make sure to send Robert a PM with the site# and links to this post so he can mark it as in progress. Will have to put it on my list to go photograph when I go take pics of the Sherwood and Florida one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
    • I wouldn’t be shocked if it’s Verizon, too. In my area they have multiple nodes on the same block as full macro sites with mmWave, in direct line of sight. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...