Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Central and South Jersey Markets


mrradic

Recommended Posts

Thanks, Mr. Myiagisr.

 

I was just surprised to see 4G show up at all, especially since it usually magically ended at the Delaware River :)

 

If the map is to be believed, all of my usual haunts would be covered with LTE.

 

Thanks again for the reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since you're a sponsor, you can see on the map if the closest site to you has been LTE accepted.  Is that the case?  Also, about how far are you from it?  My nearby tower is only 3G accepted but it's broadcasting one bar of LTE.  I'm not even 1/4 mile away from the site, and I only get one bar of LTE, so I know they're still in the testing phase of things.

 

 

Which SMS did you get?  Was it the one that said "Over the next month, the new network will be largely completed in your area"?  If so, pretty much everyone got it.  Even in markets that are FAR from completion, so take it with a grain of salt.  This site is the best resource to figure out how far along the rollout is where you live.

 I dont have any close towers accepted near me the only one is in bellmarw NJ which is a couple miles away , thats the thing my tower isnt 3g accepted yet although i think its just mssing back haul because the new cabinets are up and also new antennas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey, all:

 

Just successfully set up my Virgin Mobile iPhone 5s. Ran a quick Speedtest and got 14 mbps down and 10 up. So far, so good in this section of Camden County. I'll run a Sensorly test once I get the phone loaded with music/photos/apps, etc.

 

Thanks again for the help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whenever I go to the East Gate Shopping Center (Nixon Drive in Mt. Laurel, the Home Depot) to pick up my daughter from work 4G pops up on my phone but it is totally useless.  I can't even complete a speed test 50% of the time, it gets 0.13 Mbps down the other 50.  

 

Totally unusable, has been for almost 4 months now, and when I contacted Sprint they reply "Good News, that tower is being upgraded and should be done in 90 days!"  3 months plus the 4 already equals 7 months, I can't believe for 1 second that they spend 7 months on one tower. 

 

They really botched the transition.  Every time I have noticed the 4G on my phone initially it would be fast, 18 -20 Mbps down.  Then, about 2 months later it becomes unusable for 30 - 45 days, then it comes back at around 8 - 10 and settles in around 6. 

 

I really lost any confidence they have a plan or really know what they are doing, my contract is up in June and all the other carriers are dropping their prices so I can see us leaving, we know how much data we need in a plan now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your response is what is wrong with Sprint today.  Instead of rectifying all of the issues they are creating they just plod along alienating customers, and then wish them well as they leave.  You can only bleed so many customers before you have no customers to provide a profitable service to, not good business sense.  My problem with the way they are going about their upgrading is in the areas I work and live they take out towers and for several months the service is is not usuable, and I am supposed to be happy to pay my bill?  There has to be a better way to roll out upgrades without the turning the phone into a paper weight.  I had great 3G service, then every time I see 4G come on it is only a matter of time before I can't use my phone at that location for months, and I am not just talking about the network, droppped calls and incomplete texts.  How is this beneficial to anyone?  I know, good luck and so long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your response is what is wrong with Sprint today.

 

No, your post is what is wrong.  It violates S4GRU rules.  We do not host Sprint complaints.

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/1197-s4gru-posting-guidelines-aka-the-rulez/

 

So, one of our moderators suggested that you might be better off finding another wireless provider.  That is one option.  Other options include the following:

  • Direct your complaints to Sprint customer service.
  • Rant at one of the web sites that loves hosting Sprint complaints.
  • Become an S4GRU sponsor to become informed about progress in your area.

Regardless, you cannot complain here and tell everyone that you may leave Sprint.  That serves no productive purpose at S4GRU.

 

AJ

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In South Jersey, I see there are LTE20 and CDMA 800 sites now.  Can someone explain to me the difference between these three.  I'm not sure they affect me personally because I have an HTC One and I just get the LTE1900 "stream".  My gf's galaxy s4 gets both the 800/1900 "streams" so it might affect her better. 

 

Thanks in advance,

Lee from West Deptford, NJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In South Jersey, I see there are LTE20 and CDMA 800 sites now. Can someone explain to me the difference between these three. I'm not sure they affect me personally because I have an HTC One and I just get the LTE1900 "stream". My gf's galaxy s4 gets both the 800/1900 "streams" so it might affect her better.

 

Thanks in advance,

Lee from West Deptford, NJ

LTE 20 isn't a thing, it was a typo, meaning 20 CDMA 800 sites were turned on.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

#ifeelstupid  So 1900 is a stronger signal but doesn't go as far.  800 is not as strong but covers a further distance.  The Galaxy s4 picks up both signals but my HTC One only picks up the 1900?

 

Thanks!

 

Neither signal is stronger than the other. It's true that 800 is usable a further distance from the site, and works better indoors, but they are configured the same way, so they will deliver similar experiences, with max throughput at 37.5Mbps. 

 

The HTC One is uni-band LTE, so it will only pick up 1900 LTE. The first version of the S4 is also uni-band. However, if you have a newer model, the S4T, that is tri-band, and will pick up 800 LTE as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Now that we have many 800 sites in south and central jersey, does anyone have any experience with a tri band device? Is the switchover between 800 and 1900 seamless? Has it really improved calls and data coverage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that we have many 800 sites in south and central jersey, does anyone have any experience with a tri band device? Is the switchover between 800 and 1900 seamless? Has it really improved calls and data coverage?

 

I think the 800mhz buildout will help with call coverage, not necessarily data coverage till 800mhz LTE is onair.

 

I have family down that side of the turnpike, will have to make a trip one day and see how coverage has improved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

It seems to me like the LTE progress in South/Central Jersey area has stalled over the last month or 2. Anyone else notice this?

 

All the sites that have had their backhaul already upgraded have had their LTE turned on.  Now each remaining site will go slowly, one at a time as the new upgraded backhaul is connected and goes live.  LTE cannot run on the existing legacy backhaul.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Note 2 is in for repairs and have to use my old WiMAX Photon in the meantime. Was surprised to find that I can still connect to WiMAX at work. Same area also had solid LTE with my Note 2. Can the same tower have both LTE and WiMAX? Wonder how long WiMAX will be available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am in North Wildwood, we are a summer resort, and obviously during the summer the population spikes. The Sprint coverage maps claims we should have "Best" voice and "fair" LTE. My definition of "fair" is being able to get one bar of LTE on my second floor, outside deck. I am lucky to be able to make a voice call. Since I am using a Galaxy Note 3, I have wifi calling and thats not working the best. I have an Airave for my tenants. I have called sprint over the last year to get more information, but nothing so far. any thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am in North Wildwood, we are a summer resort, and obviously during the summer the population spikes. The Sprint coverage maps claims we should have "Best" voice and "fair" LTE. My definition of "fair" is being able to get one bar of LTE on my second floor, outside deck. I am lucky to be able to make a voice call. Since I am using a Galaxy Note 3, I have wifi calling and thats not working the best. I have an Airave for my tenants. I have called sprint over the last year to get more information, but nothing so far. any thoughts?

 

There is still one tower in the Wildwood area that hasn't been upgraded (or at least accepted, they may be working on it), I suspect that is the reason your service is as bad as it is. Unfortunately the coverage maps probably represent a best case scenario after every site in your area is complete ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...