Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Raleigh/Durham Market (includes Fayetteville)


spotmeterf64

Recommended Posts

Any updates on when Greenville, NC could possibly get LTE. They have 3G upgrades on a couple of their towers and the legacy towers are rather fast (over 1Mbps with 120ms ping).

 

No updates. Just waiting on backhaul. The first one could be any day, or over a month the away. Just don't know. They did test LTE at least once in the area because of a blip on Sensorly.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just fyi about that neighborhood... it's right behind me. I went over there today and found it's fiber to the hone at every house :(

 

Which magical neighborhood is this?

 

I'm thinking I made a poor move

Link to comment
Share on other sites

www.wakeforestfiber.com is a new site I am working on to petition the city to join the gig.u consortium in Raleigh.

I really hope it go's some where and time warner cable doesn't screw it all up. I will sign the petition when you make it. Also as a side note, did you code the site from scratch your self? If so I think it look's good so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hope it go's some where and time warner cable doesn't screw it all up. I will sign the petition when you make it. Also as a side note, did you code the site from scratch your self? If so I think it look's good so far.

 

The site is less than a week old. It will go somewhere. Things like advertising in local papers, yard signs, etc.. are planned. I just need time to sit down and finish the design, its very rough right now. I used a template to get started on the site. More to come.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hope it go's some where and time warner cable doesn't screw it all up. I will sign the petition when you make it. Also as a side note, did you code the site from scratch your self? If so I think it look's good so far.

 

the petition is now live. content is coming soon. www.wakeforestfiber.com

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the petition is now live. content is coming soon. www.wakeforestfiber.com

Cool so who is the petition going to and are they doing 1gb FTTH or just FTTH in that hood. I can and have walked to were that hood is being built. I will have to check it out now that I am back in the area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FTTP/FTTH for now. As centurylink see's more growth and competition from other vendors, they will increase their offerings.

 

See:

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/CenturyLink-Says-Theyll-Offer-1-Gbps-124085

 

The petition is going to be delivered directly to the town of wake forest via the mayor.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be happy if CenturyLink offered anything besides dial-up in some parts of Franklin County. I've been after them and Time Warner since I moved here 5 years ago. There was a petition to Embarq just as we were moving with over 120 homes along a 3 mile stretch of road that went nowhere. They brought fiber to the end of that road just a few months ago, but it only serves the homes along highway 56, and not north of there. I've talked to Time Warner's construction department and they won't do anything unless there is a density of at least 90 homes per mile. Got in touch recently with the State's broadband mapping department and they are going to contact both companies to see if they can get some movement or more information out of them, but who knows if that will help.

 

Until then, you've got hundreds of homes only 5 miles or so outside of downtown, with only dial-up or 3G on Verizon, AT&T or Sprint. My Sprint 3G speeds are terrible (hopefully not much longer) and my neighbors that have Verizon are experiencing the same thing because so many rural users with no other options are using it.

 

Maybe Verizon's HomeFusion will help some if/when they deploy LTE out our way. Sprint's LTE would be a welcome addition as well. But, the cost and data caps on wireless services (as well as the arguments against using mobile networks for home broadband, which I get...but when there are no other options what do you do?) are a real problem in rural areas and don't allow the same access to the internet as most of the rest of the country has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be happy if CenturyLink offered anything besides dial-up in some parts of Franklin County. I've been after them and Time Warner since I moved here 5 years ago. There was a petition to Embarq just as we were moving with over 120 homes along a 3 mile stretch of road that went nowhere. They brought fiber to the end of that road just a few months ago, but it only serves the homes along highway 56, and not north of there. I've talked to Time Warner's construction department and they won't do anything unless there is a density of at least 90 homes per mile. Got in touch recently with the State's broadband mapping department and they are going to contact both companies to see if they can get some movement or more information out of them, but who knows if that will help.

 

Until then, you've got hundreds of homes only 5 miles or so outside of downtown, with only dial-up or 3G on Verizon, AT&T or Sprint. My Sprint 3G speeds are terrible (hopefully not much longer) and my neighbors that have Verizon are experiencing the same thing because so many rural users with no other options are using it.

 

Maybe Verizon's HomeFusion will help some if/when they deploy LTE out our way. Sprint's LTE would be a welcome addition as well. But, the cost and data caps on wireless services (as well as the arguments against using mobile networks for home broadband, which I get...but when there are no other options what do you do?) are a real problem in rural areas and don't allow the same access to the internet as most of the rest of the country has.

 

the biggest weapon you have in your arsenal is voters. you get enough people to petition a city council, and they will be forced to investigate options with in their power. you also have the power of the vote to elect the least corrupt leaders. in north carolina... bev purdue was in cahoots with time warner cable and centurylink and helped put a ban on municipal owned cable and internet networks... wilson, nc with their greenlight service was the catalyst that caused this.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the biggest weapon you have in your arsenal is voters. you get enough people to petition a city council, and they will be forced to investigate options with in their power. you also have the power of the vote to elect the least corrupt leaders. in north carolina... bev purdue was in cahoots with time warner cable and centurylink and helped put a ban on municipal owned cable and internet networks... wilson, nc with their greenlight service was the catalyst that caused this.

I signed. :) I also hope time warner cable does not "Enjoy better" via killing 1gbs and jacking there rates even more due to the "loss's" from having to ensure they didn't have to build out a better network via some very unhanded back door deal's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Time Warner loses the RFQ for gig internet in the triangle, they will be forced to compete with the winning bidder(s). So regardless as they have already announced the interest in delivering the service and are capable of it, TWC will be pushing 1gbps to the home in our region. It's a win/win either way. The thing with TWC winning is that in most areas they can push 1gbps using the existing plant and leveraging docsis 3.1 within a year. New subdivisions would be deployed w/ fiber. If a new company came in, they would have to prepare data centers, C.O's, and where they may be able to use county/city/state dark fiber optics, they would still have to bring the fiber all the way to the home (last mile) which isn't in place... bringing a longer timeline with it.

 

My personal opinion, is that before this is over, you will see AT&T and Centurylink pushing their 1gbps here too. Mark my words. #callingit... Raleigh/Durham will become a massive hotbed for next gen internet deployment, bigger than chattanooga, austin, kansas city...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought ATT ceased their expansion of fiber/uverse? Same with Verizon FiOS. Competition will be great but they're still going to charge a ridiculous amount for anything over 50mbps. For whatever reason NC seems to always be behind the curve.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Note 2 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought ATT ceased their expansion of fiber/uverse? Same with Verizon FiOS. Competition will be great but they're still going to charge a ridiculous amount for anything over 50mbps. For whatever reason NC seems to always be behind the curve.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Note 2 using Tapatalk 2

 

expansion, and upgrading are 2 totally seperate things. I dont see uverse expansion, but I see them upgrading in high competition areas. See the Austin debacle for more info:

www.siliconhillsnews.com/2013/04/09/att-also-announces-a-1-gig-broadband-network-for-austin/

 

so in uverse areas you'll see 'upgrades'... in centurylink prism areas you will see upgrades and expansion. CL are also launching gig services... their test market is in ohmaha, ne right now.

http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/blog/boosters_bits/2013/05/not-so-fast-google-centurylink.html?page=all

 

 

btw, centurylink are only charging $80 when bundled w/ other services.

Edited by danielholt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Time Warner loses the RFQ for gig internet in the triangle, they will be forced to compete with the winning bidder(s). So regardless as they have already announced the interest in delivering the service and are capable of it, TWC will be pushing 1gbps to the home in our region. It's a win/win either way. The thing with TWC winning is that in most areas they can push 1gbps using the existing plant and leveraging docsis 3.1 within a year. New subdivisions would be deployed w/ fiber. If a new company came in, they would have to prepare data centers, C.O's, and where they may be able to use county/city/state dark fiber optics, they would still have to bring the fiber all the way to the home (last mile) which isn't in place... bringing a longer timeline with it.

 

My personal opinion, is that before this is over, you will see AT&T and Centurylink pushing their 1gbps here too. Mark my words. #callingit... Raleigh/Durham will become a massive hotbed for next gen internet deployment, bigger than chattanooga, austin, kansas city...

 

I read on avg TWC only has 300-350mbs of bandwith to the node. How are they going to give a home user 1Gbs with only less than 500mbs to the node serving the area?

 

I guess they would upgrade the fiber backhual before turning 1gbs on along with docsis 3.1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...