Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market


Ace41690

Recommended Posts

I'm pretty sure u can be on 800 voice and 1900 LTE at the same time. When u have 800 voice and LTE on, likely when u make a call, your bars level on phone will be high, but as soon as u hang up, the phone will reflect the LTE signal

Yes of course you can, but so far from the few PRL's I have tested that prioritize 1x 800, I have been unable to connect to LTE. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey digi, which PRL would prioritize 1x 800 for voice and still keep me on LTE, especially since there seems to be a big influx of 1x 800 sites up and running in NYC, would probably be reasonably stable.

Any stock PRL except for the Iphone ones and the temporary Note2 one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any stock PRL except for the Iphone ones and the temporary Note2 one.

So is their any reason why my phone would never connect to those 1x 800 sites around me unless I use  21086x.prl? Even when my signal is holding on for dear life on 1900 then eventually 1x but never 800.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is their any reason why my phone would never connect to those 1x 800 sites around me unless I use  21086x.prl? Even when my signal is holding on for dear life on 1900 then eventually 1x but never 800.

 

If you are using 21086 then you will never have 1x800 nor any LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are using 21086 then you will never have 1x800 nor any LTE.

Im pretty sure i used 21086 for this screen cap, (would initially connect to LTE and of course disconnect after a few seconds) but I will try a few of the PRL's I tried before so i can verify.

2013-08-10%2002.34.02.png

Edited by nexgencpu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im pretty sure i used 21086 for this screen cap, (would initially connect to LTE and of course disconnect after a few seconds) but I will try a few of the PRL's I tried before so i can verify.

 

 

I remember 21087 the most out of all of them...   it was the milestone PRL.

 

Sprint PRL 21087(800SMR/1XAdvanced PRL - Chicago IL is the first system in public PRLs for the 800SMR band!):

Sprint PRL 21086 to 21087 changes - 05/07/2012

Sprint PRL 21087 Analysis - 05/07/2012

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember 21087 the most out of all of them...   it was the milestone PRL.

 

Sprint PRL 21087(800SMR/1XAdvanced PRL - Chicago IL is the first system in public PRLs for the 800SMR band!):

Sprint PRL 21086 to 21087 changes - 05/07/2012

Sprint PRL 21087 Analysis - 05/07/2012

Bizarre, I will try a couple other PRL's when i get back from work. Thanks..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bizarre, I will try a couple other PRL's when i get back from work. Thanks..

The latest 56xxx series is the way to go. 800smr is set to scan first with VZW 3g roaming. Or you can always run the one in the sponsor area that I made with 800smr as high priority with the test SID as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The latest 56xxx series is the way to go. 800smr is set to scan first with VZW 3g roaming. Or you can always run the one in the sponsor area that I made with 800smr as high priority with the test SID as well.

 I have not been able to connect 1x 800 as effectively with 56015 as I have with the sponsor PRL. But the sponsor PRL forces 1x 800, whereas the 56015 is more logical and chooses the 1900 signal which is obviously closer and better signal. Only on two occasions did i connect to 1x 800 on 56015, both were for a second before I went back to 1900. One occasion, 1x on 1900 was nonexistent inside the building. Hence, 800 would have helped even if the tower was far away, but it still did not connect to it. 

 

And just for the record, the 1x 800 speed test was meant as a reference about its speed rather than a means to use it for data. 

 

I also had no issues connecting to 4G over the 34010 sponsor PRL, as seen in the screenshots. I am using the Photon Q. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I have not been able to connect 1x 800 as effectively with 56015 as I have with the sponsor PRL. But the sponsor PRL forces 1x 800, whereas the 56015 is more logical and chooses the 1900 signal which is obviously closer and better signal. Only on two occasions did i connect to 1x 800 on 56015, both were for a second before I went back to 1900. One occasion, 1x on 1900 was nonexistent inside the building. Hence, 800 would have helped even if the tower was far away, but it still did not connect to it. 

 

And just for the record, the 1x 800 speed test was meant as a reference about its speed rather than a means to use it for data. 

 

I also had no issues connecting to 4G over the 34010 sponsor PRL, as seen in the screenshots. I am using the Photon Q. 

 

PRLs don't pick networks based on signal strength.  On the 56xxx PRLs 800 and 1900 are both at the same priority.  If you are already connected to 1900 then your phone is "happy" and will not scan for another network until it needs to do so.  When it does scan it will look for 800 first.  If it finds it then it will use it of course. 

 

I recommend you guys read up on the 2 PRL articles I wrote on The Wall here at S4GRU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The latest 56xxx series is the way to go. 800smr is set to scan first with VZW 3g roaming. Or you can always run the one in the sponsor area that I made with 800smr as high priority with the test SID as well.

U mentioned on a earlier post that the iphone prl and note2 prl will not work. If I force a custom prl, will it work on iphone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

U mentioned on a earlier post that the iphone prl and note2 prl will not work. If I force a custom prl, will it work on iphone?

Yes. From everything I recall reading, it will work. The iPhone used to have the 550xx PRL, and 560xx if corporate, but then got the 510xx series of PRLs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. From everything I recall reading, it will work. The iPhone used to have the 550xx PRL, and 560xx if corporate, but then got the 510xx series of PRLs.

Yep, thru broke it off that series to add 800smr back to the series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So had LTE today & the speeds are blazing fast.

 

ezyrymev.jpg

 

Heres my location on Sensorly

 

qybyhe5u.jpg

 

This is the fastest speeds i've ever had & its the early afternoon so maybe these speeds will be consistent. They do need to improve signal density cause I lost it as soon as the bus turned onto Francis Lewis

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

Edited by IsaiahL
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Service in Queens is by far the best place i've had LTE so far. When I got to Manhattan service was there but the speed was not. 2 bars in Queens = 3-6mbps up & down , 2 bars in Manhattan = 1-2mbps down & .50up & even with the low ping its slow. Sprint really has some fine toning to do to the Network so that everywhere that has LTE speeds will be the same.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

Edited by IsaiahL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Service in Queens is by far the best place i've had LTE so far. When I got to Manhattan service was there but the speed was not. 2 bars in Queens = 3-6mbps up & down , 2 bars in Manhattan = 1-2mbps down & .50up & even with the low ping its slow. Sprint really has some fine toning to do to the Network so that everywhere that has LTE speeds will be the same. Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

Doubtful queens has better coverage then brooklyn as of now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stock PRL for the iPhone 5 is 51xxx series. The PRL has SMR 800 listed on a lower priority, so, if you lose 1900, the phone will scan for 800.

Which prl do I need for the opposite? Scan for 800 and if none found, then scan for 1900.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubtful queens has better coverage then brooklyn as of now.

I can't tell you about southern and eastern parts of queens, but northern queens (far more contiguos LTE and faster speeds) has waaay better coverage than northern brooklyn. A lot of places on Sensorly that were reported as LTE active (in brooklyn) have since lost LTE and speeds have been between 1-5 mbps when on LTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't tell you about southern and eastern parts of queens, but northern queens (far more contiguos LTE and faster speeds) has waaay better coverage than northern brooklyn. A lot of places on Sensorly that were reported as LTE active (in brooklyn) have since lost LTE and speeds have been between 1-5 mbps when on LTE.

speeds are one thing, but as for coverage, initially when LTE was announced in the Brooklyn market, it did take some time for previous LTE sites to go back up, but as of now, most if not all are up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which prl do I need for the opposite? Scan for 800 and if none found, then scan for 1900.

The only one that does it is the sponsor PRL. All official PRLs supporting 800 are at the same priority as 1900, so it won't prioritize the 800. You may want to try the other testing one here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that a live signal or is that through a modded PRL?

 

Let's just hope that 800Mhz spreads and that it finally gets on a roll! Posted Image

is prl version 25015 and im only been able to connect sometimes when im indoors.

 

Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...