Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

Yes, eHRPD will only show up on LTE phones. Legacy devices will continue to see EVDO for their 3G. LTE devices will see eHRPD because once the connection hits the tower, it is routed through the LTE switch for smooth handoffs to LTE.

 

I am checking Net Monitor for the first time on my new Evo 4G LTE and I see the I am on eHRPD here in Schaumburg. Looks like I am connecting back and forth between 2 towers in the Woodfield Rd area.

 

I checked at home yesterday and was still on EVDO Rev A.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am checking Net Monitor for the first time on my new Evo 4G LTE and I see the I am on eHRPD here in Schaumburg. Looks like I am connecting back and forth between 2 towers in the Woodfield Rd area.

 

I checked at home yesterday and was still on EVDO Rev A.

 

That's interesting, I see the same in Schaumburg too. ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for anyone who wants to have 4g for a little while, from 95th street all the way to 34 on Route 59 in Naperville, it's still on as of last night. averaged 18 mbps for approximately 10 speedtests when I went to my storage unit.

 

I'll be close to this area tomorrow, perhaps I'll have to make a small detour over to this region. Does the phone pick up the LTE automatically or do you need a reboot (assuming you do already have it set to cdma/lte)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be close to this area tomorrow, perhaps I'll have to make a small detour over to this region. Does the phone pick up the LTE automatically or do you need a reboot (assuming you do already have it set to cdma/lte)?

 

mine it automaticall came up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert jut updated site completion percentages for various LTE cities, Chicago included. It's now sitting at 35%, more than any Sprint market except maybe the Waco FIT. Granted, due I guess to backhaul issues most of these sites are still sitting on 3G, but once backhaul starts going online sites will be updated quickly with 4G, to the point that when CHI goes live in a few months coverage will probably be quite a bit more contiguous than what we're seeing today with Atlanta, San Antonio, Houston etc.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

for anyone who wants to have 4g for a little while, from 95th street all the way to 34 on Route 59 in Naperville, it's still on as of last night. averaged 18 mbps for approximately 10 speedtests when I went to my storage unit.

 

I drove up and down Route 59 today in that area and didn't find any 4G. Looks like they shut it down already. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick question. Is the reason Chicago is more complete percentage wise because they increased deployment rate after all the problems?

 

Yes. They are allowing the market to get ahead of the backhaul deployment.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. They are allowing the market to get ahead of the backhaul deployment.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

Maybe they should have done that with some other markets as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Maybe they should have done that with some other markets as well.

 

I bet going forward they will be doing just that.....seems to be working great considering the updated percentages...

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet going forward they will be doing just that.....seems to be working great considering the updated percentages...

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

 

I sincerely doubt this will be the case in anything but an emergency. Unless Sprint's revenues increase more quickly than expected, they would be burning too much cash to speed up the rollout to a large degree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, I do understand that they are temporary. But temporary could mean another few weeks or a year, ya never know. I love the Sprint plans just not the service as of lately (last year or so).

 

just get a prepaid phone from Tracfone or StraightTalk (on Verizon) as "back up" to bridge the 3-4 months..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sincerely doubt this will be the case in anything but an emergency. Unless Sprint's revenues increase more quickly than expected, they would be burning too much cash to speed up the rollout to a large degree.

 

Sprint just got a big round of funding recently...pretty sure they can afford to push heavily to get more sites online more quickly than Samsung, Ericsson and AlcaLu are doing. Particularly since, with every market that ends up with solid NV coverage, they can sell more service in that market beause people notice that the network is better. The impact is lessened in areas where backhaul shortages force sites to go live as 3G-only, but at that point it's a quick proces to connect up the backhaul once the site gets it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint had planned to burn through cash at the rate of the NV schedule. Since the schedule is starting to run approx. 4 weeks behind on average (except Chicago), I think they have a little room now to speed up other markets ahead of backhaul if they wanted to. But to allow a market to run ahead like that is a management nightmare. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if Samsung hits up Sprint for a change order to come back after the fact to handle the backhaul when it shows up.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I spent the last week in Maui, where I actually had usable 3G signal & could actually surf & use my Photon again.

 

Then I came home yesterday... O'Hare = 1xRTT... home in Bolingbrook, 1xRTT or Digital Roaming!!! Made 4 phone calls since I returned, 2 of which got disconnected.

 

*sobs*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I drove up and down Route 59 today in that area and didn't find any 4G. Looks like they shut it down already. :(

 

Thanks for saving me a few extra miles. I didnt notice any anywhere else, but 3g is pretty fast out here now... got 1.93, dont think Ive seen higher than 1.5 in the years ive been with sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to figure something out. I used to have a great Sprint signal here (Rensselaer, IN), 3G at around -74 to -86 dbm. Around a year ago or so, my signal tanked, lucky to have 2 bars, usually 1 or nothing. I had to get an Airave to have reliable service at home. Fast forward to March 2012, I noticed the native Sprint signal was once again strong, and I was pulling up to 2 Mb down (no better than 1.2 before). The strong signal lasted maybe a week, then poof, back to crap, but could still pull almost 2 meg down if I found enough signal. I'm about 5 miles from the tower. When LTE comes, will the range be any better than EVDO, or will it not improve until LTE 800 comes? I do see all the sites in my area have been upgraded to NV for 3G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to figure something out. I used to have a great Sprint signal here (Rensselaer' date=' IN), 3G at around -74 to -86 dbm. Around a year ago or so, my signal tanked, lucky to have 2 bars, usually 1 or nothing. I had to get an Airave to have reliable service at home. Fast forward to March 2012, I noticed the native Sprint signal was once again strong, and I was pulling up to 2 Mb down (no better than 1.2 before). The strong signal lasted maybe a week, then poof, back to crap, but could still pull almost 2 meg down if I found enough signal. I'm about 5 miles from the tower. When LTE comes, will the range be any better than EVDO, or will it not improve until LTE 800 comes? I do see all the sites in my area have been upgraded to NV for 3G.[/quote']

 

That Rensselaer tower has already had NV upgrades. So the improvements in 1900 signal have already been realized. The next improvements will be on voice when CDMA 800 gets added to that site later this year and LTE 800 gets added in the 2nd Half of 2013 or 1st half of 2014.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I saw the towers on the NV map for completed sites. Just wondering what they would've done last year that killed the signal so much. It actually got so bad I was bouncing from Sprint to roam, which prompted getting the Airave. Had a nice solid signal for so many years. I think the NV upgrades helped the signal just enough to allow it not to not have to roam anymore Oh well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Friend of mine showed me some documents were Sprint has submitted request for licences to use microwave backhaul in some rural towns....mine being one if those towns. How reliable is microwave???

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

Happen to have a list of those towns or can tell me if Rensselaer, IN is one of them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happen to have a list of those towns or can tell me if Rensselaer, IN is one of them?

 

Looks like most of the microwave backhaul documents I have are for Lake County IN, furthest southern location is Lowell, IN. Most of what I have is for 60+ miles outside of Chicago proper in all directions. Far North, West, and South suburbs. Its good, they're doing this to make sure backhaul is ready in rural areas ahead of setting all of Chicago market live. This way they don't have to waste time running fiber.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...