Jump to content

The Iphone 5s & Iphone 5c [not Tri-Band LTE] (was "Next iPhone to be announced on September 10")


sbolen

Recommended Posts

Anyone planning to upgrade to a 5S or 5C please explain why and what you're upgrading from.

 

Curious

 

My wife and I both own the iPhone 4S. It's contractually time to upgrade, and we both want the new iPhone 5S, as LTE is finally showing up in more of the St. Louis market.

 

I'm still on the 3G for data, and that royally sucks.

 

Also, I do iOS design and development, so my choice is clear. :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another question to be answered..  Will the iPhone 5S have a PRL that leaves 800MHz SMR at lowest priority like it is in the iPhone 5?

 

iPhone 5, 5S, and 5C should likely all be on the same PRL version, as they share the same capabilities and limitations.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

iPhone 5, 5S, and 5C should likely all be on the same PRL version, as they share the same capabilities and limitations.

 

AJ

I sure hope that changes, as the PCS signal in my home isn't very great. I like the propagation characteristics of 800 MHz CDMA.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife and I both own the iPhone 4S. It's contractually time to upgrade, and we both want the new iPhone 5S, as LTE is finally showing up in more of the St. Louis market.

 

I'm still on the 3G for data, and that royally sucks.

 

Also, I do iOS design and development, so my choice is clear. :)

4S to 5S makes sense to me.

5 to 5S not so much though. Just does't offer much

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4S to 5S makes sense to me.

5 to 5S not so much though. Just does't offer much

 

I agree... now, if the iPhone 6 comes out with tri-band (which, here's hoping), I'll make that jump immediately, even if I have to buy off-subsidy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree... now, if the iPhone 6 comes out with tri-band (which, here's hoping), I'll make that jump immediately, even if I have to buy off-subsidy. 

 

I'm buying the 5S off subsidy. Then I will buy the 6 on subsidy next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm buying the 5S off subsidy. Then I will buy the 6 on subsidy next year.

I just want to get back on the feature phone upgrade path. We left AT&T the moment Sprint picked up the 4S... At least the 5S is a very compelling update from the 4S.

 

I'm going 64GB in Gold. You?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree... now, if the iPhone 6 comes out with tri-band (which, here's hoping), I'll make that jump immediately, even if I have to buy off-subsidy.

I think the iPhone 6 will be Tri-Band , by that time 2500/2600 mhz should be fully deployed or close & you guys should know Apple by now they wait last minute to do things. The screen size change took mad long , LTE took long too & they still didn't put NFC on the iPhone .

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Put me down as pleasantly surprised. Even their mid-priced iPhone 5c has the 800 band? I was not expecting that for sure.

 

Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk 4

I'm not really surprised but if I was an iphone guy I'd definitely upgrade.  800 by itself might be worth it, but with the processor upgrade you don't have to worry about it getting sluggish before your next upgrade.  I live in an area that you NEED 800 to not have dead spots though.  In an urban location (especially one getting TD-LTE before 1900 LTE) I'd be very disappointed with it not being tri-band. 

 

And I wish people wouldn't call the 5c a "mid-priced" phone.  It's 85% the cost of the 5s.  $550 compared to $650.  A $300 would be mid-priced (free on contract).  You pay back that subsidy a little each month.  The $100 initial savings is so insignificant compared to the ~$2500 you're paying over the life of the phone. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I wish people wouldn't call the 5c a "mid-priced" phone.  It's 85% the cost of the 5s.  $550 compared to $650.  A $300 would be mid-priced (free on contract).  You pay back that subsidy a little each month.  The $100 initial savings is so insignificant compared to the ~$2500 you're paying over the life of the phone. 

I honestly can't think of a reason to get a 5c unless it's for a teenager or unless you're really cheap.  Just pay the extra $100 and get a faster processor, better camera, and Touch ID.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly can't think of a reason to get a 5c unless it's for a teenager or unless you're really cheap. Just pay the extra $100 and get a faster processor, better camera, and Touch ID.

I'd be willing to bet that the 5c outsells the 5s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be willing to bet that the 5c outsells the 5s.

Yea, I bet you are right. $99 is a great entry price for the 5c. Muggles will walk into the stores and see these new 5c devices and wonder why they should spend $200 for the iPhone 5s and most Android phones when they can get that for $99.

 

One imagines the 5c becoming their most popular phone, like the MacBook Air is their most popular laptop, and the 5s and MacBook Pros is where they do the new technologies at a slight premium.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, I bet you are right. $99 is a great entry price for the 5c. Muggles will walk into the stores and see these new 5c devices and wonder why they should spend $200 for the iPhone 5s and most Android phones when they can get that for $99.

 

One imagines the 5c becoming their most popular phone, like the MacBook Air is their most popular laptop, and the 5s and MacBook Pros is where they do the new technologies at a slight premium.

I wish I could give you an upvote for the use of the world muggle.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, I bet you are right. $99 is a great entry price for the 5c. Muggles will walk into the stores and see these new 5c devices and wonder why they should spend $200 for the iPhone 5s and most Android phones when they can get that for $99.

 

One imagines the 5c becoming their most popular phone, like the MacBook Air is their most popular laptop, and the 5s and MacBook Pros is where they do the new technologies at a slight premium.

 

I'd be willing to bet that the 5c outsells the 5s.

 

 

Wall Street doesn't seem to agree with y'all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be willing to bet that the 5c outsells the 5s.

It definitely will , 1 it comes in colors , 2 its cheaper , tho it doesn't have the new camera & fingerprint sensor its still not worth the upgrade even for those with the 4S especially if your 4S is still in good working condition .

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint CFO Joe Euteneuer confirmed that Apple's newest iPhones, the iPhone 5s and 5c, do not support LTE on 2.5 GHz spectrum, which Sprint will use for a nationwide TD-LTE deployment.

 

... It's not clear if or when Apple will add TD-LTE support for Band 41, which lies in 2.5 GHz spectrum. China Mobile has said starting next year it will require its TD-LTE devices to support Band 41.

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-cfo-apples-iphone-5s-and-5c-do-not-support-lte-25-ghz-spectrum/2013-09-11?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Editor&utm_campaign=SocialMedia

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint CFO Joe Euteneuer confirmed that Apple's newest iPhones, the iPhone 5s and 5c, do not support LTE on 2.5 GHz spectrum, which Sprint will use for a nationwide TD-LTE deployment.

 

... It's not clear if or when Apple will add TD-LTE support for Band 41, which lies in 2.5 GHz spectrum. China Mobile has said starting next year it will require its TD-LTE devices to support Band 41.

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-cfo-apples-iphone-5s-and-5c-do-not-support-lte-25-ghz-spectrum/2013-09-11?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Editor&utm_campaign=SocialMedia

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

So, the iPhone 6 will support 41. Cool.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am very disappointed that Apple did not include band 41 in the 5s...for all the reasons mentioned earlier, but for selfish reasons as well.  I live and work in the IBEZ, and therefore I don't anticipate widespread 800 anytime soon - although my market has shown some ability to include 1x SMR, it's still not a forgone conclusion that North East Ohio should expect 800 LTE on any or all sites.  On top of that, LTE on both 1.9 and 800 can only be rolled out in our market as fast as the crews can install the new equipment, backhaul, etc.  We do, however, have 2.5 Wimax available throughout our area so I was very excited to see if LTE is live yet; at the very least I would anticipate the roll-out to be much quicker for 2.5 than the 1.9 and / or 800.  When the iPhone 5 was released it was reported that it would not be compatible with the AWS bands that TMobile was rolling LTE out on, only the PCS bands which were far more limited.  But if I recall, Apple pushed out a firmware update to the device enabling it to operate on TMobile's AWS frequency.  Could the same thing be possible for the 5s and band 41?  I know it's not likely, but is it even possible since band 41 was not included in the original FCC filings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expected the iPhone 5s/c to be single band so to hear it supported 800 lte I'm definitely estactic about that. I'm contemplating about selling my iPhone 5 in exchange for

Iphone 5c. I live in the country so lte on 2600 is not that important but it would have been nice if it was included

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their BRS/EBS licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well.  — — — — — Edit: Turns out this is a spectrum swap where T-Mobile is basically giving them DoD spectrum in a bunch of markets in exchange for all of SoniqWave's BRS/EBS. SoniqWave will likely turn around and sell the DoD spectrum to AT&T whenever the FCC removes the 40MHz cap.
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...