Jump to content

Current Sprint PRLs

halcyoncmdr

By halcyoncmdr
in General Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

halcyoncmdr Member Level: eHRPD

halcyoncmdr

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Anyone know anything about PRL 20989 -- it's what I currently have on my iPhone 5s.  I did a few searches here and on XDA and didn't turn up anything.

 

I haven't had a chance to go through the PRL list since the 5S launch. I know the 5S and 5C use different C-SIM cards instead of the standard UICC cards every other LTE device uses (albeit each slightly different for mini/nano size and whether they allow GSM or not).

 

Makes sense that something different might be required for the PRLs as well, Apple loves to make things more complicated.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 935
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

digiblur
digiblur

International cleanup basically.   PRL Comparison of PRLS 55021 to 55022 -Removes- Geo:21 SID/NID 1525/65535 IUSACELL - MEXICO CITY MX Removed. Geo:21 SID/NID 24577/65535 Portatel Del Sureste - CH

halcyoncmdr
halcyoncmdr

After reading some threads here in regards to PRL versions and the differences between each version on different devices, I took the time to find the listing of all current Sprint PRLs.   This include

digiblur
digiblur

I'll send you guys the bill for the deliverable soon....    This doesn't include the 800 scan order changes as my app doesn't analyze that granular as it would be a report 5 miles long every time. 

Posted Images

gnoj Member Level: eHRPD

gnoj

Posted
Posted

And Sprint loves to make many useless series of PRLs...

 

Such as the 54xxx series? Since it seems to be for corporate world phones like 56xxx apparently is...

 

Anyways, looks like a new set of PRLs have been released. Sprint just pushed 54016 to me, which of course overrode the custom PRL I had been using in place of the previously issued 54015. I am curious to see if the full set of 1x 800 SIDs have now been added.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
imex99 Member Level: 4G LTE

imex99

Posted
Posted

I'll let you know when someone pulls it from their device and sends it to me. No one has done this yet though.

How do you do this, if I have time and can, I'll try...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

How do you do this, if I have time and can, I'll try...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4

If you find the QPST guide for your device on writing a PRL all you do is hit read and save. It usually saves as rl0 but it is still a PRL.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

Interesting... we have a new 800SMR channel in the scan:

 

1X: S/476 S/487 S/526

 

So, using AJ's formula in his article, "What's the frequency, Kenneth?" Interpreting your engineering screen. Part two.

 

uplink center frequency (MHz) = 806 + (0.025 × carrier channel)
downlink center frequency (MHz) = 851 + (0.025 × carrier channel)

 

476 = 817.9 downlink / 862.9 uplink

487 = 818.175 downlink / 863.175 uplink

526 = 819.15 downlink / 864.15 uplink

 

I thought maybe this is what Sprint did with the 800SMR that went missing in our area earlier this week but I still can't connect to it even though I scan see it on the spectrum analyzer.  I'll have to check to the see the exact frequency the carrier is at now though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

Interesting... we have a new 800SMR channel in the scan:

 

1X: S/476 S/487 S/526

 

Honestly, I am not surprised.  My suspicions had been raised, as I have not had CDMA1X 800 for about the last week now.  If the carrier channel assignment has been shifted from SMR 476 to SMR 487, that would explain the disappearance.

 

Sprint may have determined that it needed to shift the CDMA1X 800 carrier up a few hundred kHz for out of band emissions reasons.  Who knows?  But this change should not affect the 5 MHz FDD LTE 800 carrier at all.  Even at SMR 487 with a downlink center frequency of 863.175 MHz, the upper 625 kHz of the CDMA1X carrier should extend to around 863.8 MHz.  On the downlink, that still leaves 864-869 MHz for the 5 MHz FDD carrier.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

Preliminary reports:

800SMR scans now include channel 487.
CA GEOs scan an additional PCS channel
Alaska Digitel changed from native to roaming indicator shown.
Cleaned out some old unused Alltel SIDs

And that's about it so far... I'll do some additional digging later today.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

Honestly, I am not surprised.  My suspicions had been raised, as I have not had CDMA1X 800 for about the last week now.  If the carrier channel assignment has been shifted from SMR 476 to SMR 487, that would explain the disappearance.

 

Sprint may have determined that it needed to shift the CDMA1X 800 carrier up a few hundred kHz for out of band emissions reasons.  Who knows?  But this change should not affect the 5 MHz FDD LTE 800 carrier at all.  Even at SMR 487 with a downlink center frequency of 863.175 MHz, the upper 625 kHz of the CDMA1X carrier should extend to around 863.8 MHz.  On the downlink, that still leaves 864-869 MHz for the 5 MHz FDD carrier.

 

AJ

 

Thanks for the additional info.  Probably why I haven't seen them turning up 800SMR on any new sites in over a month now here.  Weird that I still can't connect to it with this new PRL.  Will have to do some more research.  Maybe I'm not holding it right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chamb Member Level: 4G WiMax

chamb

Posted
Posted

Thanks for the additional info.  Probably why I haven't seen them turning up 800SMR on any new sites in over a month now here.  Weird that I still can't connect to it with this new PRL.  Will have to do some more research.  Maybe I'm not holding it right?

Still connecting to 800 SMR on 476 in Shentel area.  Using Galaxy S3 with 25016 PRL

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

Thanks for the additional info.  Probably why I haven't seen them turning up 800SMR on any new sites in over a month now here.  Weird that I still can't connect to it with this new PRL.  Will have to do some more research.  Maybe I'm not holding it right?

 

For the time being, Sprint may have turned down the sync and paging channels on SMR 476, leaving only the pilot channel running.  In that case, the carrier will show up on a spectrum analyzer, but mobiles will not be able to attach to it.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mmark27 Member Level: 4G WiMax

mmark27

Posted
Posted

The PRL on the HTC Evo is now 55016  I got it the other day, but couldn't remember if that is what it was before I updated.  :blush:

 

I just did a PRL update on my Galaxy S4 and now have the 55016 PRL up from 55015 in Madison, WI.  Once I updated, I got a blip of 1x800SMR (as chimed by SignalCheck Pro) but then 800SMR went away and haven't had it since.  I didn't see much for this phone or PRL on that gdoc in OP.  I've got a lot of tower work around me but nothing active in my immediate area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • dkyeager
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Yuhfhrh
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By Yuhfhrh · Posted

      Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • dkyeager
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
    • RedSpark
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By RedSpark · Posted

      https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/05/att-announces-7-monthly-add-on-fee-for-turbo-5g-speeds/ Hopefully we don't ever see T-Mobile do something like this. Based on how I was treated with my Credit Limit, it's definitely not the same company it was before the merger, and it's entirely possible they'd try it.
    • PythonFanPA
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By PythonFanPA · Posted

      Jelly Beans  

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...