Jump to content

Sprint Super Bowl Coverage/DAS


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mikejeep said:

Sprint appears to be surging ahead with the big gameday crowds on Tutela..fbcae481f6384c0649c11a0071b93467.jpg

Sure seems like it...

Sprint’s 5G looks like the big winner this year. Curious what the final reports will show.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brad The Beast said:

Graph has updated. Sprint is in last again. These graphs are garbage. What is it based on?? You refresh it and it changes to something else. Median download speeds hardly ever update. 

I agree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that I'll be near the Dolphins stadium, but I'll be in Miami (at/near the airport) Wednesday night. Will be interesting to see how the LTE network performs once the town is back to normal, which it should be by then.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ookla has published their report. Sprint came in third for overall speed, second for LTE speed. https://www.speedtest.net/insights/blog/football-stadium-speed-2020/

TLDR:

Verizon wins overall thanks to excellent 5G speeds (297.18Mbps average overall). It did however come in last for LTE speed (30.67Mbps average LTE speed).

T-Mobile comes in second for overall download speed (121.93Mbps average overall). First for LTE speed (66.35Mbps average LTE speed).

Sprint was in third for overall speed (114.93Mbps average overall). Second for LTE speed behind T-Mobile (56.16Mbps average LTE speed).

AT&T came in last again for overall speed (103.68Mbps average overall). Third in LTE speed (39.18Mbps average LTE speed).

5G Specific data:

Verizon had the fastest 5G thanks to their mmWave. They had an average 5G download speed of 646.17Mbps. They had the slowest average 5G uploads at 9.86Mbps. Verizon had the worst average 5G latency at 91ms.

T-Mobile came in second for 5G speed thanks to the mmWave they also rolled out. Their average 5G download speed was 348.33Mbps. They had the fastest 5G upload speed at 28.89Mbps. Their average 5G latency was 32ms.

Sprint came in third for 5G speed. Their average 5G download speed was 225.78Mbps. Their average 5G upload speed was 15.39Mbps. Their average 5G latency was 15ms, the best of the three reported.

AT&T didn't make the 5G cut. According to Ookla there were less than 10 AT&T 5G tests. As a result they didn't make it in.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Brad The Beast said:

Sprint came in third for 5G speed. Their average 5G download speed was 225.78Mbps.

This is surprisingly slow. Not sure why that would be. I don't believe the NR airlink would have been saturated...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RAvirani said:

This is surprisingly slow. Not sure why that would be. I don't believe the NR airlink would have been saturated...

From the Sprint Newsroom Site:

At the Miami stadium where Sprint’s hometown Kansas City team and San Francisco will face off, we’ll provide even more Sprint customers with improved capacity and faster speeds on Game Day (as well as future games, events and concerts). Based on the huge increase in customers’ data usage last year and in 2018, we’re using two different technologies this year to help meet fans’ demands to stream, download, video chat, text and connect on social.

  • In and around the stadium, Sprint’s Massive MIMO radios using our fast 2.5 GHz spectrum and breakthrough “split-mode” feature will enable us to simultaneously deliver our most-advanced LTE service and Sprint 5G for customers attending the showdown in person.
  • In addition, we will be providing 4G/5G dual connectivity within the stadium, transmitting 4G over a state-of-the-art distributed antenna system (DAS) with more than 1,800 antennas and 5G through Massive MIMO radios.

Together, these solutions will provide the equivalent of 10 macro cell towers at the stadium. That will give fans the coverage and capacity they need whether they’re in their seats, at the concession stand or tailgating in the parking lot.

.........

Was the backhaul saturated? Not enough Massive MIMO radios?

Edited by RedSpark
Updated
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have we reached peak data? ATT data usage went down from 11.5 TB to 10.2 TB in stadium and 23.5TB to 14.5TB 2 mile radius. The last couple years it has doubled should be interesting to see the others.

 https://about.att.com/innovationblog/2020/01/data_network_football_game_2020.html

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Flompholph said:

Have we reached peak data? ATT data usage went down from 11.5 TB to 10.2 TB in stadium and 23.5TB to 14.5TB 2 mile radius. The last couple years it has doubled should be interesting to see the others.

 https://about.att.com/innovationblog/2020/01/data_network_football_game_2020.html

I don't think you can read too much into it without lots of other variables filled in. How many AT&T devices were at the stadium (and within 2 miles) this year compared to last year? Also, Hard Rock Stadium is kind of in the middle of nowhere, at least population / destination wise.. especially compared to last year, in Downtown Atlanta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.verizon.com/about/news/verizon-customers-record-amounts-data-super-bowl

Verizon's numbers are out also with 21.5 TB in and around the stadium. 

This is the first time in 5 years data has not grown massively. Sprint for example 2015 754GB ,2016 1.6TB, 2017 5TB, 2018 9.7TB, 2019  25TB, and now 2020 7TB.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Flompholph said:

https://www.verizon.com/about/news/verizon-customers-record-amounts-data-super-bowl

Verizon's numbers are out also with 21.5 TB in and around the stadium. 

This is the first time in 5 years data has not grown massively. Sprint for example 2015 754GB ,2016 1.6TB, 2017 5TB, 2018 9.7TB, 2019  25TB, and now 2020 7TB.

That is interesting.

Unless I’m missing it, T-Mobile only released this information: 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, RedSpark said:

That is interesting.

Unless I’m missing it, T-Mobile only released this information: 

 

 

I mean Sprint really did quite well. Very well.  But the importance of that extremely quick 5G ping time (latency) can NOT be overstated!  Nice! 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Wow.

For comparison....

Here's what Verizon is doing: https://www.verizon.com/about/news/verizon-elevates-super-bowl-lv

Here's what AT&T is doing-in-part (more information is referenced in an earlier link): https://www.fiercewireless.com/operators/at-t-s-mmwave-5g-takes-off-at-tampa-airport

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Some pretty solid upgrades here!

Summarized:

  • $100+ million investment in 5G infrastructure across the city. More than 95% of people in Greater Los Angeles are now covered with T-Mobile’s super-fast Ultra Capacity 5G network.
  • At SoFi Stadium, T-Mobile deployed a brand new state-of-the-art 5G system with upgraded 100 Gigabit backhaul and the deployment of Ultra Capacity 5G service using mid-band and millimeter wave spectrum. Gives SoFi the capability equal to nearly 100 traditional macro cell sites. T-Mobile customers could experience peak download speeds of 1.5 Gbps.
  • Across the city, indoor systems have been upgraded at more than a dozen venues, including Los Angeles Convention Center, Crypto.com Arena and LA’s most popular and largest hotels. At LAX, T-Mobile now provides 5G service at Tom Bradley International Terminal and Mid-Field Satellite Concourse.
  • Hundreds of macro sites have been upgraded and nearly 200 small cells across the city have been installed or upgraded with Ultra Capacity 5G increasing the density and capacity of the network and providing peak speeds up to 1 Gbps.

Here's what AT&T is doing:

And Verizon:

More info: https://www.verizon.com/about/news/speed-january-31-2022

 

Nice overall analysis here: https://www.lightreading.com/5g/verizon-atandt-and-t-mobile-again-rally-around-5g-for-super-bowl/d/d-id/775159

Edited by RedSpark
Added AT&T/Verizon
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, BucketHead25 said:

Am I the only one tired of these super bowl stories?  This event is for the elites who can afford to spend $5000 for a ticket to a 3 hr show.   

This thread is specifically about Super Bowl mobile coverage. From a tech standpoint, it's pretty cool to see what can be accomplished. I would suggest skipping over it in the future if you're not interested. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BucketHead25 said:

Am I the only one tired of these super bowl stories?  This event is for the elites who can afford to spend $5000 for a ticket to a 3 hr show.   

Nothing in this thread (running for seven years now!) has anything to do with the cost of tickets or "elites". It's purely focused on the network/upgrades that each carrier deploys in the Host City for the Game.

Each carrier is deploying the best network that it can for a high profile/huge capacity event, and it's neat to see their talking points about what makes their network the best vs. the others. The really cool thing is that many of these upgrades are permanent. So as time has gone on with the Game being hosted in different cities, these Host City networks have substantially improved as technology advances.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...