Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Can we stop reposting (quoting) that humongous screenshot. Any more reposts and T-Mobile won't be the only one coming to a crawl.

 

:devil:

 

A baby certainly can crawl faster than those T-Mobile speeds. However, a baby still can't cry as loudly as John Legere, especially when free spectrum is at stake. They sure need that extra spectrum though at those speeds. Wow, that's slow!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was searching online for wireless news, and I discovered this very interesting bit of news in an article about a unique company selling unlimited MVNO services :

 

https://www.rcrwireless.com/20151130/carriers/sprint-unlimited-lte-data-remains-an-option-tag2

 

 

and the company's website, here :

 

http://www.unlimitedville.com

 

 

Note : The rates for their supposedly unlimited and unthrottled 4G LTE service, is $42.99 monthly using the Sprint network, and $198 monthly using the Verizon network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to this Milan guy it is an issue with oakla servers and no tmobile.

https://www.reddit.com/r/tmobile/comments/3uyhos/are_you_sure_your_cell_site_is_congested_bingeon/

 

Right....  I bet the test is even worse with Sensorly... 

 

I have an idea, let suse a TMUS app to measure data speed so TMUS can show the "true" speed of their network.  I bet Dr. Legere would not manipulate any of the data that the customer receives....  :o

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint parent SoftBank considered a potential suitor for Yahoo's Internet business

 

Link: http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-parent-softbank-considered-potential-suitor-yahoos-internet-business/2015-12-02

 

There's a reason Yahoo is falling like a rock... Last thing SoftBank needs is this albatross.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint parent SoftBank considered a potential suitor for Yahoo's Internet business

 

Link: http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-parent-softbank-considered-potential-suitor-yahoos-internet-business/2015-12-02

 

There's a reason Yahoo is falling like a rock... Last thing SoftBank needs is this albatross.

giphy.gif

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was searching online for wireless news, and I discovered this very interesting bit of news in an article about a unique company selling unlimited MVNO services :

 

https://www.rcrwireless.com/20151130/carriers/sprint-unlimited-lte-data-remains-an-option-tag2

 

 

and the company's website, here :

 

http://www.unlimitedville.com

 

 

Note : The rates for their supposedly unlimited and unthrottled 4G LTE service, is $42.99 monthly using the Sprint network, and $198 monthly using the Verizon network.

 

Anyone try this yet?  Cheaper then Karma and getting a little roaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/atts-lurie-replaces-crickets-van-buskirk-john-dwyer-brands-new-prepaid-chie/2015-12-02

 

The misogyny on these comments by the Magentans. Good Lord almighty. :td:  :td:  :td:  

 

Not going into politics, but there seems to be a common theme with magentans. And ironically, they'll turn around and be SJWs. 

 

Not only do they believe in an entire dogmatic complex from their carrier politics alone, but this group are bigots too.

 

Must be pleasant people. 

Edited by cortney
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint needs to get the stores/reps aligned on the same terminology and messaging.

 

Sometimes Sprint needs to save itself from itself. The change to LTE Plus is adding another layer of content, and unless mentions of Spark are quickly removed and deprecated in all existing content, reps and customers could be confused.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint needs to get the stores/reps aligned on the same terminology and messaging.

 

Sometimes Sprint needs to save itself from itself. The change to LTE Plus is adding another layer of content, and unless mentions of Spark are quickly removed and deprecated in all existing content, reps and customers could be confused.

 

Spark hasn't been mentioned for a very long time and the tradition to this LTE plus moniker has been going on for months before the announcement with several of the new Sprint devices not having any Spark logo or anything of the sort in the software.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spark hasn't been mentioned for a very long time and the tradition to this LTE plus moniker has been going on for months before the announcement with several of the new Sprint devices not having any Spark logo or anything of the sort in the software.

True, but "Sprint Spark" is still used on the Coverage Map, under the Data Tab.

 

https://coverage.sprint.com

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but "Sprint Spark" is still used on the Coverage Map, under the Data Tab.

 

https://coverage.sprint.com

 

That's the one thing that I am confused as to why they haven't fixed yet. Maybe they're trying to figure out a way to differ between non-CA and CA areas on the map and market them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the one thing that I am confused as to why they haven't fixed yet. Maybe they're trying to figure out a way to differ between non-CA and CA areas on the map and market them.

Agreed. Hopefully that coverage map page gets a total makeover. IMHO, Sprint should have ensured this was sorted out before it launched "LTE Plus" as a replacement for Spark.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need band 41 in every tower and more. It is simple as that. The 120mhz of 2.5ghz spectrum is their only advantage over the others and they need to go further with it. If you have a city with 1000 towers and you put band 41 only 500 towers that won't cut it.

 

 

They have to over match and over power the others three. They have the spectrum to do it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need band 41 in every tower and more. It is simple as that. The 120mhz of 2.5ghz spectrum is their only advantage over the others and they need to go further with it. If you have a city with 1000 towers and you put band 41 only 500 towers that won't cut it.

They have to over match and over power the others three. They have the spectrum to do it.

They have the Spectrum, but even with SoftBank's backing, Sprint doesn't have the gobs of money that AT&T/Verizon do, so it can't just throw money shotgun style at its network. It has to be smart. I trust Marcelo and his new team will get it done right this time. Sprint needs to touch every tower, but it needs to target the most important ones first.
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the one thing that I am confused as to why they haven't fixed yet. Maybe they're trying to figure out a way to differ between non-CA and CA areas on the map and market them.

 

I still can't stress how they need to also figure out how to make a new map. They can keep the old one available for people who like it so much. But I hope they're working a whole new bigger, cleaner map besides differentiation.

 

That needs to be Sprint's 2016 resolution: Clean up the site UI, clean up old links and areas of site. Please

Edited by cortney
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still can't stress how they need to also figure out how to make a new map. They can keep the old one available for people who like it so much. But I hope they're working a whole new bigger, cleaner map besides differentiation.

 

That needs to be Sprint's 2016 resolution: Clean up the site UI, clean up old links and areas of site. Please!

*ahem*

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/7337-ultimate-sprint-coverage-map/

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 120mhz of 2.5ghz spectrum is their only advantage over the others and they need to go further with it.

It's really not as big of an advantage as they make it out to be. Verizon has 90 MHz of LTE on the air *today* across three carriers on almost every site in my city, with a site density high enough that they use narrow-beam antennas everywhere, and they haven't even started their AWS-3 overlay yet. AT&T has 50-70 MHZ on the air across 2-3 LTE carriers with an even higher site density and is overlaying another carrier right now (and this is actually a spectrum-constrained market for them as they have no AWS here). Everyone but Sprint is already running 4x2 MIMO on their high-band spectrum (although Sprint has at least upgraded to hardware capable of it now).

 

Sprint isn't planning to do more than 3x20 MHz of band 41 on most sites, putting them at 80 MHz (plus any additional band 25 carriers) on most tri-band sites in the *future*. And with the lowest average site density of the top 4 carriers, you can see why small cells are so important to them.

 

Now, before I get responses from people who think I just called band 41 worthless, please re-read the first sentence of my post. All I'm saying is that the amount doesn't necessarily make it the acclaimed treasure trove.

 

The biggest advantage that spectrum will probably offer is its ability to be shifted to downlink-only (thanks to TDD) for carrier aggregation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Spark logo and name will linger for a bit. I still have it on my phone when it boots up.  I keep up on things and can't tell you what the new name means.  Does that mean carrier aggregation and if so how much of the market.   Beam... 8T8R ?   A lot of knowledge to have to sell because their technology had to be sold.    People just need to experience it working.  

Edited by Calvin200
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...