Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Diversity is great, but I'm not a fan of forced diversity. Just get the best people to do the job and the rest should sort itself out.

 

This isn't a forced diversity by any means, but as an employee, I can tell you that he does have a point.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't a forced diversity by any means, but as an employee, I can tell you that he does have a point.

On the corporate and tech side, does Sprint demographics have similar composition to other tech companies, i.e. white, male, and Asian?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't a forced diversity by any means, but as an employee, I can tell you that he does have a point.

 

Although I did quote JimBob's post I was speaking in general terms. I did notice where the spokesperson made sure to point out that Marcelo's remarks weren't the start of a new hiring policy. I'm curious to see where it leads, if anywhere, or if it turns out to be just lip service in front of some politicians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the corporate and tech side, does Sprint demographics have similar composition to other tech companies, i.e. white, male, and Asian?

 

I would say it is more mixed, although telecom as a whole is always male-centric. The VP of Sales Engineering is a woman, our SVP of HR is a woman, etc. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the corporate and tech side, does Sprint demographics have similar composition to other tech companies, i.e. white, male, and Asian?

 

Deval says, "Hey, I resemble that remark."

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I do.

 

The seven Ps come to mind.

 

Oh I recall both AT&T really sucking for many years once the 3G iPhone came out. Verizon not much better. But big red built its network and then boasted. Where AT&T needed to fall down hard many times. Now they seem to have a decent (not great) network.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm not sure if you realize, but you just shut your own argument down. Edited by greenbastard
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

EVO 4G release in 2010 is when I recall it really starting to get bad.

For me it was February 2011. It was like a switch was flipped. In January everything was fine. Then I was out of the country for a month and when I came back data was completely unusable in the area of Pittsburgh I lived.

 

I was just passing through my old neighborhood last week, and there was strong B41 everywhere. I was surprised how much it had improved since I was there a few months ago. I rarely dropped B41 everywhere I went in Pittsburgh and the immediate suburbs, much better than San Francisco and Oakland currently.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me it was February 2011. It was like a switch was flipped. In January everything was fine. Then I was out of the country for a month and when I came back data was completely unusable in the area of Pittsburgh I lived.

 

I was just passing through my old neighborhood last week, and there was strong B41 everywhere. I was surprised how much it had improved since I was there a few months ago. I rarely dropped B41 everywhere I went in Pittsburgh and the immediate suburbs, much better than San Francisco and Oakland currently.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

While I have been with Sprint for over 13 years, I did leave the country in 2011-2013 to work overseas, so I applaud all of you who held on through the Wimax-LTE debacle. :P

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought it was funny that people called it a debacle because I never experienced WiMax troubles in my area. At the time, in much of my home area I could get 16 Mbps peak on WiMax and average speeds of around 8 Mbps. The only problem was battery life was horrible and when I went into my house I could only get WiMax if I stood in the back by the window. If I wasn't on WiMax, EVDO speeds were around 10kbps.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought it was funny that people called it a debacle because I never experienced WiMax troubles in my area. At the time, in the area I could get 16 Mbps peak on WiMax and average speeds of around 8 Mbps. The only problem was battery life was horrible and when I went into my house I could only get WiMax if I stood in the back by the window. If I wasn't on WiMax, EVDO speeds were around 10kbps.

Boom. Exactly how it was for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if you realize, but you just shut your own argument down.

except AT&T didn't create a site showing updates performed nor boast till it worked. And it took them about 2-3 years where as sprint is almost doubling or tripling that if you count WiMAX

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought it was funny that people called it a debacle because I never experienced WiMax troubles in my area. At the time, in the area I could get 16 Mbps peak on WiMax and average speeds of around 8 Mbps. The only problem was battery life was horrible and when I went into my house I could only get WiMax if I stood in the back by the window. If I wasn't on WiMax, EVDO speeds were around 10kbps.

I also had good Wimax service... where I could find it.  Good ole Clearwire.  ;)  The rest is history.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

except AT&T didn't create a site showing updates performed nor boast till it worked.

 

Even though it both dates back to updates from 2011 and isn't updated often enough (making it somewhat ineffectual for showing very recent updates), they did... 

 

http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=24795

http://www.att.com/gen/sites/focus?pid=22633

 

Likewise, if anyone knows of such an update site from Verizon or T-Mobile, please let me or others know. 

Edited by cortney
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the corporate and tech side, does Sprint demographics have similar composition to other tech companies, i.e. white, male, and Asian?

This is from the IndyProud rally sprint threw for employees to celebrate our #1 root metrics and to hand out some awards.

 

This is the network team that handles sprint in Indy and got our #1 ranking. It was led by the man speaking and the woman next to him44c90fd9ff313e1b0e5c1ba85dc62355.jpg

  • Like 19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

except AT&T didn't create a site showing updates performed nor boast till it worked. And it took them about 2-3 years where as sprint is almost doubling or tripling that if you count WiMAX

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's not even the argument on hand. You gripped about Marcelo not doing anything in year 1 (if it has even been that long). Yet you bring up how it took at&t years to get it working.

 

 

You basically contradicted yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not even the argument on hand. You gripped about Marcelo not doing anything in year 1 (if it has even been that long). Yet you bring up how it took at&t years to get it working.

 

 

You basically contradicted yourself.

 

 

well no -- i was actually repeating that Sprint seems always end announcements with - more time is needed.  

 

but hey to each there own!  

 

I think Marcelo has done a great job - he had a bunch of crap to clean up and wasn't (isn't) afraid to get his own hands dirty.  

 

In the past 24 months TMO has done the most at rattle the Big two.  Sprint can do even better - but not now, maybe later ;-) 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though it both dates back to updates from 2011 and isn't updated often enough (making it somewhat ineffectual for showing very recent updates), they did... 

 

http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=24795

http://www.att.com/gen/sites/focus?pid=22633

 

Likewise, if anyone knows of such an update site from Verizon or T-Mobile, please let me or others know. 

 

interesting -- that is very cool thanks for sharing!  

 

not an exact overlay I am sure -- Washington DC for both:

 

https://network.sprint.com/DC/Washington/    (circa 2014/2015)  780 updates 

and

http://www.att.com/gen/sites/focus?pid=22632&market=WDC   Circa 2011  2400 updates which includes 80ish new towers

 

I assume Money helps here 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well no -- i was actually repeating that Sprint seems always end announcements with - more time is needed.

 

but hey to each there own!

 

I think Marcelo has done a great job - he had a bunch of crap to clean up and wasn't (isn't) afraid to get his own hands dirty.

 

In the past 24 months TMO has done the most at rattle the Big two. Sprint can do even better - but not now, maybe later ;-)

Also consider how much crap Marcelo has had to deal with from John Legere taunting him repeatedly, along with the recent personal attacks made by John Legere against Marcelo, alleging drunkenness, which is very unprofessional and ethically wrong to say to anyone, particularly the CEO of a major business competitor.

 

All along, Marcelo has remained very professional about this, even with other people criticising him so much for what he himself did not cause at Sprint, since he's only been there a year. Surely, Sprint still has issues, which he is dealing with as fast as he can. I've had issues with Sprint too, but even I'm amazed at hearing how much is being done even since I left Sprint last month. Lots of updates since then in the Premier Sponsor section, especially in Chicago.

 

Anyways, I still hope the best for Sprint and for Marcelo to find a way in the network upgrades, pricing plans, etc. in his business to finally shut up John Legere. I've really had enough of it myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought it was funny that people called it a debacle because I never experienced WiMax troubles in my area. At the time, in much of my home area I could get 16 Mbps peak on WiMax and average speeds of around 8 Mbps. The only problem was battery life was horrible and when I went into my house I could only get WiMax if I stood in the back by the window. If I wasn't on WiMax, EVDO speeds were around 10kbps.

 

^^This. I actually had an Evo 4G and Clearwire unlimited wireless Internet at home and both were stellar. Those were the "good old days" and I remember them fondly.

 

Speaking of the Evo 4G, why doesn't anyone put HDMI-out on phones anymore? Oh, wait....back up....why doesn't HTC build good phones anymore? <tears and sadness>

 

Carry on with the topic! lol

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^This. I actually had an Evo 4G and Clearwire unlimited wireless Internet at home and both were stellar. Those were the "good old days" and I remember them fondly.

 

Speaking of the Evo 4G, why doesn't anyone put HDMI-out on phones anymore? Oh, wait....back up....why doesn't HTC build good phones anymore? <tears and sadness>

 

Carry on with the topic! lol

Now they use MHL adapters via USB to HDMI.  I prefer the mini HDMI cable, as I have one.  My MHL adapter never worked.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^This. I actually had an Evo 4G and Clearwire unlimited wireless Internet at home and both were stellar. Those were the "good old days" and I remember them fondly.

 

Speaking of the Evo 4G, why doesn't anyone put HDMI-out on phones anymore? Oh, wait....back up....why doesn't HTC build good phones anymore? <tears and sadness>

 

Carry on with the topic! lol

No need for HDMI. I use AirPlay

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought it was funny that people called it a debacle because I never experienced WiMax troubles in my area. At the time, in much of my home area I could get 16 Mbps peak on WiMax and average speeds of around 8 Mbps. The only problem was battery life was horrible and when I went into my house I could only get WiMax if I stood in the back by the window. If I wasn't on WiMax, EVDO speeds were around 10kbps.

 

The problem was WiMax just never became that widespread.  A lot of markets never got it or just got protection site coverage.  And when you consider Sprint started charging the $10 "Premium" data fee while at the same time many customers were experiencing a deteriorating network, I can understand why a lot of people felt burned. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem was WiMax just never became that widespread. A lot of markets never got it or just got protection site coverage. And when you consider Sprint started charging the $10 "Premium" data fee while at the same time many customers were experiencing a deteriorating network, I can understand why a lot of people felt burned.

Bingo

 

When my water company starts charging a premium fee to upgrade their equipment- I'm fine paying it till it is paid off.

 

Sprint decided to charge a fee that never really was targeted for all users. Basically it was poorly worded and even worse at deployment. Especially since it launched as a 4g fee if I recall.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bingo

 

When my water company starts charging a premium fee to upgrade their equipment- I'm fine paying it till it is paid off.

 

Sprint decided to charge a fee that never really was targeted for all users. Basically it was poorly worded and even worse at deployment. Especially since it launched as a 4g fee if I recall.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't recall it being a 4g fee at all. I remember it being a smartphone fee
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...