Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

On 6/6/2018 at 7:53 PM, RAvirani said:

In low traffic areas, I personally don't see much benefit in deploying 8T8Rs over mini macros, if there are no capacity issues.  8T8Rs do provide better coverage and propagation than mini macros, but I think the difference is small enough that it can be overlooked.  

Ultimately, to deploy NR (which will be the next major wave of upgrades we see), both mini macro and 8T8R antenna/RRU sets will need to be swapped out for massive MIMO antennas.  In the meantime, why waste money on 8T8Rs where they aren't needed?

What can also be asked is why waste money on 8T8R when a MM would do.  I have seen this a lot.  Low traffic tower that gets >20Mbps on B25 at any point in the day gets 8T8R gear. Tower in growing part of town that is always <5Mbps gets a MM.  

And all those 8T8R gear that has been deployed over the years in BFE instead of a more urban area.  While there are still a many towers in BFE that are 3G or GMO LTE w/ only B25.  

From an outsiders prospective, it can be hard to less the logic in their madness.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, derrph said:

The Kickstart page is live. Nice breakdown on what all you get compared to their UF plan. The only problem I have is the coverage map, It shows the "overall" coverage. I guess if the other carriers are doing it then why not. The map shows coverage everywhere but that might not be the case based on that map. 

 

https://www.sprint.com/en/shop/plans/unlimited-kickstart.html

Has anyone noticed the change of text in the shareable data section regarding Mobile Hotspot, VPN, P2P? It's not shown on this comparison table, but on the regular page under Shop -> Plans -> Unlimited, the new text mentions an auto buy-up of 10GB of data once you reach the 10GB limit instead of a decrease to 2G speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cyclone said:

Has anyone noticed the change of text in the shareable data section regarding Mobile Hotspot, VPN, P2P? It's not shown on this comparison table, but on the regular page under Shop -> Plans -> Unlimited, the new text mentions an auto buy-up of 10GB of data once you reach the 10GB limit instead of a decrease to 2G speeds.

They better come clean on all these limitations on the kickstart page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, red_dog007 said:

What can also be asked is why waste money on 8T8R when a MM would do.  I have seen this a lot.  Low traffic tower that gets >20Mbps on B25 at any point in the day gets 8T8R gear. Tower in growing part of town that is always <5Mbps gets a MM.  

And all those 8T8R gear that has been deployed over the years in BFE instead of a more urban area.  While there are still a many towers in BFE that are 3G or GMO LTE w/ only B25.  

From an outsiders prospective, it can be hard to less the logic in their madness.  

BFE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bigsnake49 said:

They better come clean on all these limitations on the kickstart page.

It's actually not a limitation on the kickstart unlimited plan, as they don't offer any shareable data such as mobile hotspot. This is a change to the Unlimited Freedom plan with differing texts from one page to another

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the fact that Sprint is sticking to being BAU. I just passed a new Sprint Corp store being worked on for launch.  I turned back around and the inside has the same set with the all white, window panels and yellow lighting along the displays. This store will be extremely close to a T-Mobile 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's nothing big, anything positive should be considered a small win.. according to this new speed testing firm .. Sprint has surpassed att in average download speeds.
https://speedsmart.net/wireless_index/may_2018/

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk




You can definitely tell that Sprint is really injecting money into their network. Those results are showing that they are not too far behind in some aspects. The downloads are a mess though but at least they were all above 20mbps.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, tyroned3222 said:

I know it's nothing big, anything positive should be considered a small win.. according to this new speed testing firm .. Sprint has surpassed att in average download speeds.
https://speedsmart.net/wireless_index/may_2018/

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

Just imagine when gigabit lte shows up! Granted Sprint announced plans to roll out gigabit lte back in March 2017 and its June 2018 yet they still have not delivered but this is great news especially since they still have so much in the arsenal.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No surprise here, but the Charlotte, NC results show that Sprint has a lot of catching up to around here.

30.63 / 8.05 - AT&T
25.32 / 7.74 - T-Mobile
7.28 / 2.12 - Sprint
30.95 / 6.46 - Verizon
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, tyroned3222 said:

I know it's nothing big, anything positive should be considered a small win.. according to this new speed testing firm .. Sprint has surpassed att in average download speeds.
https://speedsmart.net/wireless_index/may_2018/

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

These guys aren't very big. They don't have a big crowd to pull from.  The play store only shows that they have 10,000+ app downloads.  Those who regularly use it, I am sure isn't very big.  

But there data is showing that, imo, that this speed race is becoming more of a marketing thing than anything. You get to the point where the speeds are high enough, anything higher is just a marketing tool.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PCMag's Fastest Mobile Networks 2018 is out now. Here are some quotes from it regarding Sprint.

Quote

AT&T and Sprint have focused on download speeds, so they are best for content consumption, video streaming, and web browsing.

Sprint got hit heavily in our ratings because of its very slow upload speeds, but the good news is that its download speeds have increased massively over the past few years. Sprint had the fastest downloads in Philadelphia, St. Louis, Oklahoma City, Houston, and Seattle. If we were only rating by downloads, like some other organizations do, we could hand out some shiny trophies to Sprint right now.

https://www.pcmag.com/Fastest-Mobile-Networks

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Paynefanbro said:

PCMag's Fastest Mobile Networks 2018 is out now. Here are some quotes from it regarding Sprint.

https://www.pcmag.com/Fastest-Mobile-Networks

Sprint really kept up with the other 3 and at times exceeded them in raw download. It's the upload that holds them back soo much.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Paynefanbro said:

PCMag's Fastest Mobile Networks 2018 is out now. Here are some quotes from it regarding Sprint.

https://www.pcmag.com/Fastest-Mobile-Networks

Its pretty insane, thats without 4x4 MIMO or Massive MIMO live..

If they pair B25+B41 and CA uploads will not be an issue at all. Its just a matter of Sprint making that a priority. At this point, they are more focused on launching VoLTE and deploying B41 on all macro sites/small cells.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, derrph said:

Sprint really kept up with the other 3 and at times exceeded them in raw download. It's the upload that holds them back soo much.

I think that's one of the biggest takeaways from this. Sprint went from being the slowest carrier in the U.S. by a large margin to being up there with everyone else in what is basically a tradeoff. PCMag said it best that Sprint is good for content consumption, video streaming, and web browsing whereas T-Mobile is great for content creators and the social media crowd with it's super high upload speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Paynefanbro said:

I think that's one of the biggest takeaways from this. Sprint went from being the slowest carrier in the U.S. by a large margin to being up there with everyone else in what is basically a tradeoff. PCMag said it best that Sprint is good for content consumption, video streaming, and web browsing whereas T-Mobile is great for content creators and the social media crowd with it's super high upload speeds.

Doesn't matter now. At&t is allowed to get Time Warner with no conditions.  That Tmobile merger is basically guaranteed at this point.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T and Time Warner got the green light. Let’s open the flood gates officially to buy up whoever. This ruling today gives and shows there little to no reason why Tmo and Sprint cannot marry. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, derrph said:

AT&T and Time Warner got the green light. Let’s open the flood gates officially to buy up whoever. This ruling today gives and shows there little to no reason why Tmo and Sprint cannot marry. 

https://imgur.com/a/B8sF89M

https://imgur.com/a/qHmO0Ud

 

my wifi speed :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://seekingalpha.com/news/3363488-jefferies-t-decision-make-sprint-t-mobile-road-easier

 

i agree to a small extent with this article....the justice department could decide to sue them to try to stop merger....also remember the beef the CEO of John ledger and Donald trump had for a short while? well that could have a effect to on the merger now that donald trump is in power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...