Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

On a side note, I always thought a while back that if Sprint were to rename itself, that Spectrum would be a perfect name, butl TWC took it.

 

TS

Sprint has a holding company with the name Sprint Spectrum plus Sprint was once a partner in SpectrumCo, LLC. So the name isn't completely unfamiliar.

 

I'm still partial to Southern Pacific Railroad Internal Network Telecommunications, or SPRINT for short.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint has a holding company with the name Sprint Spectrum plus Sprint was once a partner in SpectrumCo, LLC. So the name isn't completely unfamiliar.

 

I'm still partial to Southern Pacific Railroad Internal Network Telecommunications, or SPRINT for short.

Nextel always sounded like a better brand than Sprint. But unfortunately Nextel will always be synonymous with *chirp chirp*.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wireless and cable cos don't want to be dumb pipes anymore, think about how much Google, YouTube, Netflix, etc have made off the backs of Verizon, Comcast, time Warner... Mergers nowadays are going to be full of strategery

Comcast/NBC, vz/yahoo, at&t/directv, t-mobile/dish, sprint/(insert media company)

 

 

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disney (Magic Kingdom) is well. Slowest has been 15Mbps and fastest 75Mbps and on B25 at that. B25 is constantly faster than B41 and the upload is great for getting my pictures uploaded. :-)

Hey I'm in Disneyland right now too! Here's what I've found:

 

Sprint has three B25 carriers on air (8109, 8140, 8665) as well as three B41 carriers (39874, 40072, 40270).

 

Speeds on Sprint and VZW are been slow but usable. AT&T and T-Mobile are pretty much useless.

 

I wish Sprint would load balance between B25 and B41 better and that they'd run 6 B41 carriers here instead of three - I think those two things would really help with the data here.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The solution/answer is to not run speed tests.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

 

But, but, my e-peen...

 

Anyway it was mostly a joke. I get the idea, massive capacity upgrade is a massive win for normal use cases, so I'm far from complaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Sprint going to start zero-rating speed tests or are people going to be deprioritized after a single 20+GB @700+Mbps speed test?

Why would you need to run a speed test? The network should never give you issues with speed.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey I'm in Disneyland right now too! Here's what I've found:

 

Sprint has three B25 carriers on air (8109, 8140, 8665) as well as three B41 carriers (39874, 40072, 40270).

 

Speeds on Sprint and VZW are been slow but usable. AT&T and T-Mobile are pretty much useless.

 

I wish Sprint would load balance between B25 and B41 better and that they'd run 6 B41 carriers here instead of three - I think those two things would really help with the data here.

I remembered my wife has the S6 so pulled up engineering screen. PCS 15x15 on 8615. I tested the WiFi and it's really solid coverage here. Got 60/60 the few times I checked it. Would be interesting to see their load graphs from customer traffic in the park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remembered my wife has the S6 so pulled up engineering screen. PCS 15x15 on 8615. I tested the WiFi and it's really solid coverage here. Got 60/60 the few times I checked it. Would be interesting to see their load graphs from customer traffic in the park.

Is this at Disneyland or Disney World? I'm at Disneyland and I've only seen 8109, 8140 and 8665…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8140 would be a 10x10 carrier expanded from 8109.

That's what I thought…I wonder why I see both in different parts of the park - maybe Disneyland is on the border of two areas where Sprint has different spectrum holdings (full A block vs. part of the A block)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I thought…I wonder why I see both in different parts of the park - maybe Disneyland is on the border of two areas where Sprint has different spectrum holdings (full A block vs. part of the A block)?

It's surprising they would do this. LTE I believe would clobber CDMA if they're nearby and overlap, so I doubt they have any CDMA left in that other 5x5 chunk. How much PCS in addition to the G block do they own? It's possible they refarmed some CDMA and haven't changed the other sites' config yet.

 

In Pittsburgh, Verizon runs 10x10 on B2 (PCS) in the suburbs, but in the city it's only 5x5 because according to my spectrum analyzer they still have 2 CDMA carriers on air (downtown vs Homestead if anyone is curious). So I guess that's a far enough distance, being several miles. If the distance is enough at Disney, it's possible there are still some CDMA carriers on air in that spectrum.

 

Sent from my Pixel XL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://promo.sprint.com/Registration/AAdvantageLanding

 

Anyone ever tried this promo? This would be interesting to me if I lived in a Sprint area currently. 

My family was going to do it, but when you sign up for it you lose any corporate discounts you have, so we opted not to.

 

-Anthony

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The solution/answer is to not run speed tests.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

 

 

In a perfect world. With today's marketing climate, zero rating speed tests could encourage a better sample size more reflective of the gains in Sprint's network, and make Ookla tests a better benchmark for positive network progress. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a perfect world. With today's marketing climate, zero rating speed tests could encourage a better sample size more reflective of the gains in Sprint's network, and make Ookla tests a better benchmark for positive network progress. 

 

I'd rather they not zero-rate speed tests. I'm perfectly fine with RootMetrics testing networks for the time being.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

does zero rating do any harm at all ?

 

Only harm it does is people constantly running speed tests, but then again the average user is probably not running speed tests constantly. Speeds tests tend to be used when a user thinks his/her connection is super slow as a diagnostic tool or when it is super fast for e-peen contests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...