Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

But it can be achieved with 800/1900 if they added extra panels to the site, correct?

 

-Anthony

Yeah. You just add more antennas and radios.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shentel doing well: http://seekingalpha.com/article/3382935-shenandoah-telecommunications-shen-ceo-chris-french-on-q2-2015-results-earnings-call-transcript

 

The transcription is a little rough in spots, but you should be able to get the gist.

I wish Sprint would be this transparent. Plus, I hate the strategy when sprint says B41 and carrier aggregation is the answer. The answer is a multi-pronged approach.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soccer has become HUGE in the KC and STL markets. Particularly the KC market, and is growing quickly elsewhere.

Not quickly enough. It's not something Sprint should sit on and wait to explode (if it ever even does) especially with the rising competitive nature of this wireless industry.

The Women's World Cup grabbed very high ratings, beating out baseball and other sporting events on TV for every game that wasn't on cable. I would not call it niche.

It's still niche. You can't compare the Women's world cup (which was nationally televised) with a regular season MLB game that is regionally broadcasted.

 

Soccer is very niche. Some teams have very poor TV exposure. In Houston, the Dynamo often get pushed to an alternative channel in favor of NBA or MLB games.

 

Like I said, Soccer isn't something Sprint should be waiting around for to develop with T-Mobile closing in.

Edited by greenbastard
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. You just add more antennas and radios.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

They use a different channel/frequency correct? Or are they positioned so they don't overlap? Or something else?

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They use a different channel/frequency correct? Or are they positioned so they don't overlap? Or something else?

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

 

Frequency reuse, adjust the beamwidths of the other antennas, no big deal. The antennas are typical 30 to 65 degrees anyways. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an 8t8r only thing.

But it can be achieved with 800/1900 if they added extra panels to the site, correct?

 

Nothing but a PCS G thang to add extra sectors to band 25.

 

Just get Calvin Broadus and Dr. Dre, Ph.D. in sweet G physics, to optimize them.

 

(NSFW)

 

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frequency reuse, adjust the beamwidths of the other antennas, no big deal. The antennas are typical 30 to 65 degrees anyways. 

 

To return this to serious discussion, those beam widths are specified by half power (-3 dB) levels.  For 360 degree polar response in a typical three sector site, the half power levels probably will be around 65 degrees per antenna -- that sounds about right.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day it comes down to this, Sprint needs to get B26 everywhere and optimized. This is their biggest issue speeds are not.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

RootMetrics states otherwise.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day it comes down to this, Sprint needs to get B26 everywhere and optimized. This is their biggest issue speeds are not.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Getting b41 on every site (or critical ones) satisfies the average consumer demand, shuts down what is probably the main complaint about Sprint and allows them to set up b26 on sites for distance instead of thinking about capacity in certain areas. In many places b26 is optimized, just not towards coverage.

 

For instance you can take the KC or STL areas (I've noticed it more in the STL areas). Nine months ago there would be multiple places with massive amounts of traffic (I'm referring to volume of consumers) that had b26 but it would be 2-5 dbm stronger than b25. As soon as b41 and 8t8r popped online b26 started to gradually cover more completely, and now 9 months later there's a 10-15 dbm stronger signal on b26 over 25 in the exact same spots.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting b41 on every site (or critical ones) satisfies the average consumer demand, shuts down what is probably the main complaint about Sprint and allows them to set up b26 on sites for distance instead of thinking about capacity in certain areas. In many places b26 is optimized, just not towards coverage.

 

For instance you can take the KC or STL areas (I've noticed it more in the STL areas). Nine months ago there would be multiple places with massive amounts of traffic (I'm referring to volume of consumers) that had b26 but it would be 2-5 dbm stronger than b25. As soon as b41 and 8t8r popped online b26 started to gradually cover more completely, and now 9 months later there's a 10-15 dbm stronger signal on b26 over 25 in the exact same spots.

All the B26 I've seen is a few dBm weaker than B25 and or B41.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like Sprint has changed their share plans again. And the new plan offers for $100 and $120 simply have their access fees waived until Sept 2016.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Incorrect

 

Up to 4 lines for $100/month with 10 GB offer, $120/month with 40 GB. Both offers include $15 access charges per line/per month waived for life as long as you're enrolled in the plan.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incorrect

Where are you seeing that about being waived for life?

 

If you expand the family plan section And look under the See the Savings section of the following it says access fees waived until 9/30/2016:

 

http://www.sprint.com/shop/plan-wall/?view=unlimitedtalk#!/

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where are you seeing that about being waived for life?

 

If you expand the family plan section And look under the See the Savings section of the following it says access fees waived until 9/30/2016:

 

http://www.sprint.com/shop/plan-wall/?view=unlimitedtalk#!/

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

http://www.sprint.com/landings/datashare/index.html

 

It's a promotion for the 10GB/$100 and 40GB/$120 plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.sprint.com/landings/datashare/index.html

 

It's a promotion for the 10GB/$100 and 40GB/$120 plans.

This is what I saw on that page below the comparison and related it to the offer:

 

Capture.JPG

 

No big deal.  It's just not clear on the website that its waived for life.

Edited by AppleFanBoy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is an awesome deal and price then!

 

http://www.sprint.com/landings/datashare/index.html

It's a promotion for the 10GB/$100 and 40GB/$120 plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I saw on that page below the comparison and related it to the offer:

 

attachicon.gif Capture.JPG

Must be leftover language from the prior plans. They should get that fixed.

 

Per the press release

 

hese new 10GB and 40GB options on this plan have no per-line data access charges ever on the first four lines when a customer switches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must be leftover language from the prior plans. They should get that fixed.

 

Per the press release

 

 

You know if I go to that URL logged in I see a different version of the page then if I'm not logged in.

 

I see the blurb about the fee being waived for life now after logging out.

 

Never mind me, carry on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People don't leave because they get 5mbps instead of 50. They leave because they lose LTE and then their internet times out and apps won't load.

 

I'm wasn't insinuating that that's not a problem. I was simply stating that RootMetrics indicates that reliability isn't the problem as much as speeds are. Testing of their network indicates that the area where Sprint is lacking is average speeds. In select markets this isn't the case and in those markets we see that Sprint is doing insanely well from a business standpoint. In a day and age where data is the focus of many carriers attention, you have to keep up.

 

As much as I hate the speed test contest, we have to acknowledge that it's a thing that many people factor into their purchase. A lot of people just want to see "My network is faster than yours." and it's not just a niche crowd anymore.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm wasn't insinuating that that's not a problem. I was simply stating that RootMetrics indicates that reliability isn't the problem as much as speeds are. Testing of their network indicates that the area where Sprint is lacking is average speeds. In select markets this isn't the case and in those markets we see that Sprint is doing insanely well from a business standpoint. In a day and age where data is the focus of many carriers attention, you have to keep up.

 

As much as I hate the speed test contest, we have to acknowledge that it's a thing that many people factor into their purchase. A lot of people just want to see "My network is faster than yours." and it's not just a niche crowd anymore.

I think part of it is because when people see lower speeds, they know it will just get slower over time as more people change carriers or usage increases. Or they think that the network may become unusable during peak hours or during events. With a higher speed, there's more room for growth. Plus things are noticeably laggier and slower at 1-2Mbit versus 5-6 even. Once it drops below 1 Mbit things stop working well (at least for me). Above 25 and most people likely won't be able to tell the difference though.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once it drops below 1 Mbit things stop working well (at least for me). Above 25 and most people likely won't be able to tell the difference though.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

 

With regard to this specific portion of your comment, this pretty much applies specifically to LTE. For some reason, on EVDO 1Mbps is fine whereas 1Mbps on LTE feels sluggish beyond belief.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...