Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note 4


dnicekid

Recommended Posts

So do we know yet whether the Note 4 supports the CCA/RRPP bands yet?

 

Yes and no.  Yes, we do know.  And, no, it does not.

 

The Sprint variant covers bands 25/26/41 -- along with probably some international bands.

 

The regional "R4" variant covers bands 2/4/5/12/17 -- and it supports SVLTE.  It is a separate CCA/RRPP version.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have huge expectations from year to year. The note 2 was a huge jump from the one but to expect huge jumps in change and performance year in and year out is a bit unrealistic. ...I mean look at the iPhone

 

Sent from my CoziBlurred4.3 gN2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have huge expectations from year to year. The note 2 was a huge jump from the one but to expect huge jumps in change and performance year in and year out is a bit unrealistic. ...I mean look at the iPhone

 

Sent from my CoziBlurred4.3 gN2

Yeah, the iPhone 6 has the same camera as the 4S. :)

 

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the iPhone 6 has the same camera as the 4S. :)

 

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

I was referring more to how it's not changed significantly in how many years? This is the first year in many that it's had a big change at least that's my feeling.

 

Sent from my CoziBlurred4.3 gN2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was referring more to how it's not changed significantly in how many years? This is the first year in many that it's had a big change at least that's my feeling.

 

Sent from my CoziBlurred4.3 gN2

I knew the point you were making, my point was even in a year where the iPhone changed so significantly, it still has the same camera from the 4S, which was released in 2011.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have huge expectations from year to year. The note 2 was a huge jump from the one but to expect huge jumps in change and performance year in and year out is a bit unrealistic. ...I mean look at the iPhone

 

Sent from my CoziBlurred4.3 gN2

Yeah, but to pack in a bunch of gimmicky features like heart rate sensors and not upgrade the antenna... Personally, comparing to IPhones standard is weak. They are the Kings of doing very little to a device and touting it as huge new advances.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but to pack in a bunch of gimmicky features like heart rate sensors and not upgrade the antenna... Personally, comparing to IPhones standard is weak. They are the Kings of doing very little to a device and touting it as huge new advances.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

Well they have a very loyal customer base and when you only have one option well

 

Sent from my CoziBlurred4.3 gN2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For someone that has the Note 3, I just don't see it worth it for this phone. It's almost like a Note 3s (In Apple terms). Small incremental improvements.

 

Maybe if you're coming from an older phone, or a Note 2, but other than that, this one is a pass in my book.

Well that can be said for any device now a days, most of these devices are already high end so the updated model just won't be that much of an increase compared to the current model.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew the point you were making, my point was even in a year where the iPhone changed so significantly, it still has the same camera from the 4S, which was released in 2011.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

I am by no means defending apple but even though it has the same megapixel count doesn't mean its the same camera.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am by no means defending apple but even though it has the same megapixel count doesn't mean its the same camera.

Good point. It is amazing they are still only using an 8mp camera though when most other flagships are twice that, excluding HTC, of course.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point. It is amazing they are still only using an 8mp camera though when most other flagships are twice that, excluding HTC, of course.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

Why does it need to be a higher MP. I am already overly impressed with this camera on this phone. It's a noticeable improvement even from the 5s... Yeh, Still 8 megapixels but definitely not the same innards that the 4s had.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 on Crapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to control this thread, but this a night shot a friend took with his 6. I was blown away because I've stood in the same exact spot and my pictures always came out with too much noise or just no where near this good....with my 5saa02f0d7c16dea3dca04f7c1b5da41cd.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 on Crapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does it need to be a higher MP. I am already overly impressed with this camera on this phone. It's a noticeable improvement even from the 5s... Yeh, Still 8 megapixels but definitely not the same innards that the 4s had.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 on Crapatalk

I suppose that's the same theory HTC has but I'll tell you, going from an 8mp camera (S3) to a 13mp (S4T) was a substantial difference. I know the megapixel count isn't always the main difference but it can't hurt to help produce a higher quality picture.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ and Robert are supposed to be working on an article on the N4 so I hope it comes soon.

 

 

We have currently shleved the GN4 article.  We may revisit that in the future, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May I ask why? I was looking forward to your insights on the device.

 

No one has time in the interim.  And by the time we do, it is likely past relevancy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does it need to be a higher MP. I am already overly impressed with this camera on this phone. It's a noticeable improvement even from the 5s... Yeh, Still 8 megapixels but definitely not the same innards that the 4s had.

 

Every had to crop a picture? At 8MP, you have very little latitude in cropping until quality is severely compromised.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you give the cliff notes of it while it still has relevancy?

 

Cat 4, supports B25/26/41.  No Carrier Aggregation.  No Sprint VoLTE.  No CCA/RRPP compatibility.  Basically, the timing of the Note series releases makes it bad for Sprint, year after year.  It always seems to be the last model of the year that doesn't support the new Sprint network initiatives.  There you go.

Edited by S4GRU
Changed to Cat 4
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you give the cliff notes of it while it still has relevancy?

 

What do you want to know?  There is not much to report.  Sprint tri band handset FCC OET docs are becoming a bit boring:  tri band LTE, e/CSFB, etc.  We are reaching LTE device maturity already.  Band 41 carrier aggregation is the next frontier, I suppose.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cat 6, supports B25/26/41. No Carrier Aggregation. No Sprint VoLTE. No CCA/RRPP compatibility. Basically, the timing of the Note series releases makes it bad for Sprint, year after year. It always seems to be the last model of the year that doesn't support the new Sprint network initiatives. There you go.

Any insight on upcoming devices that will take advantage?

 

Sent from the cosmos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any insight on upcoming devices that will take advantage?

 

Take advantage of or add support for which capability?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cat 6, supports B25/26/41.  No Carrier Aggregation.  No Sprint VoLTE.  No CCA/RRPP compatibility.  Basically, the timing of the Note series releases makes it bad for Sprint, year after year.  It always seems to be the last model of the year that doesn't support the new Sprint network initiatives.  There you go.

 

Yikes. 3 cons. I've been debating whether to move on from Nexus 5 to this or wait for the mythical Shamu creature. Note 4 seemed like a slam dunk. Now, not so much. Still a great phone however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...