Jump to content

Off topic daily driver/dream car?


illest_ios

Recommended Posts

'96 Cheverolet Beretta z26 for the winter daily driver.

'85 Pontiac Fiero GT for the summer daily driver.

'94 Corvette for my weekend toy.

'04 Silverado for year round truck duties.

 

When all of them are parked outside I have been told that my yard looks like a GM used car lot. :)

 

 

As far as a dream car.  There are just way to many to list.  But I think a Vanquish would top the list right now.  A new Sting Ray would be second.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I drive a 2002 Chevrolet Trailblazer LT, one of the greatest car's I have ever driven (considering I have only driven 3 cars). My Dad drives a 2006 Chevrolet Corvette and my mom drives her 2013 Chevrolet Volt. I'll tell ya, for an electric car, that thing is amazing.

Dream car is probably an SS trailblazer (Don't judge me) :)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had a few cars over the years but I simply refuse to get rid of my 1999 Civic Si(bought brand new in 1999).  Currently it's boosted with about 400whp and I still get 30 miles to the gallon when I am not driving the hell out of it.  I am much older now so I feel bad driving it when I do, LOL, but it is so fun to drive though.  I mostly drive my girls car if I need to go anywhere.  I am a huge fan of bmw's so that will probably be my next purchase, maybe a year old m3, not sure if I will be able to afford the 2014 m4.  My dream car would probably be anything ferrari but more specifically the ferrari F70(LaFerrari).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had a few cars over the years but I simply refuse to get rid of my 1999 Civic Si(bought brand new in 1999).  Currently it's boosted with about 400whp and I still get 30 miles to the gallon when I am not driving the hell out of it.  I am much older now so I feel bad driving it when I do, LOL, but it is so fun to drive though.  I mostly drive my girls car if I need to go anywhere.  I am a huge fan of bmw's so that will probably be my next purchase, maybe a year old m3, not sure if I will be able to afford the 2014 m4.  My dream car would probably be anything ferrari but more specifically the ferrari F70(LaFerrari).

 

 

b16 engine im assuming? my girl has a Ek6 hatch, hondas are good strong cars! how much boost are you running?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

b16 engine im assuming? my girl has a Ek6 hatch, hondas are good strong cars! how much boost are you running?

B16 bottom b18 heads, fully built and forged everything.  Right now, I am running 16lbs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

'02 Toyota Camry - (bad engine rebuild, vibrates like crazy and needs a new water pump every 5-6000 miles)

 

I plan to get a 2014 Mazda 6 soon.

 

If I had $100000 burning a hole in my pocket I would get either a Tesla Model S or Model X.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My work vehicle is a 2013 Ford Explorer. My personal vehicle on the weekends is a 1994 GMC Suburban.

 

My dream vehicle is a Bugatti Veyron. But I'm concerned about its Fried Chicken hauling capacity.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daily-07 Ford Focus

Dream-Nissan GTR

Our new division president at my office was using his GTR for his daily driver for about 6 weeks. Must be nice. Almost crashed my car trying to get a good look at it, he parked it right in the middle of the lot like its nothing,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daily Driver:  A 2010 Hyundai Elantra Blue

 

Dream Car:  

 

Two pronged answer here.  (a.)  To own (assuming I had the money), a fully restored silver-birch Aston Martin DB5 as seen in several Bond films, notably Goldfinger.  Have always loved the look/styling of that baby.

(b.)  Not sure if I'd want to own one or not, but for one day of my life, I've always wanted to be able to drive one of these:

 

http://bit.ly/1aB0Quw

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daily ride is a burgman (mainly because it's stupid cheap to run and based on previous experience owning a zxr750, anything faster I would be dead). 

 

Dream ride is either a triumph explorer 1200 for 2 wheels or if I was pushed to get a cage it would be a TVR (Speed6 \  Speed 12 or similar) because you have to respect anything that goes over 200mph and is made by men in a shed out of old canoes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...