Jump to content

LTE Plus / Enhanced LTE (was "Sprint Spark" - Official Name for the Tri-Band Network)


Recommended Posts

What does?

 

In addition to RSRP (dBm), there are RSRQ and RS-SINR. Just looking at RSRP won't tell you anything about interference or signal quality, but RS-SINR will.

 

For all of those measurements, higher is better. Keep in mind that the wider the carrier deployed, the better edge-of-cell performance you will get. This is one of the reasons why Band 25 LTE is useless at -120 dBm but Band 41 works great well past that. T-Mobile uses wider carriers than Sprint, so they'll probably have better quality of signal at the same RSRP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In addition to RSRP (dBm), there are RSRQ and RS-SINR. Just looking at RSRP won't tell you anything about interference or signal quality, but RS-SINR will.

 

For all of those measurements, higher is better. Keep in mind that the wider the carrier deployed, the better edge-of-cell performance you will get. This is one of the reasons why Band 25 LTE is useless at -120 dBm but Band 41 works great well past that. T-Mobile uses wider carriers than Sprint, so they'll probably have better quality of signal at the same RSRP.

 

Just learned something new.   :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just learned something new.   :)

 

This video covers RSRQ by first covering RSRP and RSSI:

 

http://lteuniversity.com/get_trained/video_tutorials/m/videotutorials/11555.aspx

 

RSRQ = N * RSRP / RSSI, where:

RSRP = Reference Signal Received Power (dBm)

RSSI = Received Signal Strength Indicator (dBm)

N = measured bandwidth

 

This video also covers RSRP:

 

http://lteuniversity.com/get_trained/video_tutorials/m/videotutorials/11523.aspx

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-cfo-were-banking-25-ghz-8t8r-radios-network-differentiation/2014-05-19 '> http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-cfo-were-banking-25-ghz-8t8r-radios-network-differentiation/2014-05-19

This article states that no current Sprint Spark phone will be able to take full advantage of the new antennas yet. It's says customers will have to upgrade their phones later this year or next.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-cfo-were-banking-25-ghz-8t8r-radios-network-differentiation/2014-05-19

This article states that no current Sprint Spark phone will be able to take full advantage of the new antennas yet. It's says customers will have to upgrade their phones later this year or next.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

The only part current Spark phones will not be able to take full advantage of is carrier aggregation. All devices will benefit from the new antennas and the overall increased capacity afforded by the additional carriers.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure MU-MIMO is enabled which allows the network to treat each tx/rx path as a separate channel and serve 4 times more users at good speed than band 26 and 25 which only have a pair of antennas. So you may not have one user per sector able to get 240mbps but you may be able to serve 4 users at 60mbps. Total system capacity is more important than peak speed anyway.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the 600mhz auction is next year but can sprint start incorporating the band support to their devices next year?

 

Im skipping the iPhone 6 for the "6s" since it will likely support support carrier aggregation for band 41, unlocked out the box, 700mhz support (rural roaming hub), and maybe volte

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the 600mhz auction is next year but can sprint start incorporating the band support to their devices next year?

 

Im skipping the iPhone 6 for the "6s" since it will likely support support carrier aggregation for band 41, unlocked out the box, 700mhz support (rural roaming hub), and maybe volte

No. There is no such thing as a 3gpp band for 600 mhz or any equipment to support 600.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok so I've done a few days worth of testing and here's what I've found. Having band 41 enabled on my s5 murders my battery. With it on I average about 4 hours with regular usage. With it off I've been getting between 6-7 hours of screen on time before my battery dies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

As near as I can tell someone was lazy and neglected to change the calibration for the signal bars to account for the difference between rssi in cdma and rsrp in lte. in other words -105db rssi for cdma equals 1 bar and -105db rsrp for lte equals 1 bar despite the fact that at those levels cdma is approaching the point of failure and lte is still quite usable. the Verizon and T-mobile phones I have observed are calibrated correctly, so the onus is on Sprint to correct it. The consequence of not correcting the oversight will be displeased lay customers that are walking around thinking the network sucks because most of the time they only have 1 or 2 bars out of a possible 6.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As near as I can tell someone was lazy and neglected to change the calibration for the signal bars to account for the difference between rssi in cdma and rsrp in lte. in other words -105db rssi for cdma equals 1 bar and -105db rsrp for lte equals 1 bar despite the fact that at those levels cdma is approaching the point of failure and lte is still quite usable. the Verizon and T-mobile phones I have observed are calibrated correctly, so the onus is on Sprint to correct it. The consequence of not correcting the oversight will be displeased lay customers that are walking around thinking the network sucks because most of the time they only have 1 or 2 bars out of a possible 6.

The bars take more into account than signal strength. You can't compare them to Verizon and T-Mobile because they are using different carrier widths than Sprint which will offer better performance at the same RSRP. This is, for example, why Sprint 5x5 LTE is useless at -120 dBm while 20 MHz Spark is useable well beyond that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been observing the bars changing in relation to the rsrp where as they do not change in relation to the rsrq. This isn't my first rodeo. I remember the good old days when Sanyo phones displayed bars based on ec/io which was much more relevant in determining the success and quality of a call, then they switched to rssi based bars which was practically worthless since you could have perfect calls at 1 bar and garbled ones at 4 bars. Maybe LTE bars should be based on the negotiated link rate with the tower or some other more meaningful metric. But as of right now I'm fairly certain they are based on the rsrp but with a scale appropriate for CDMA rssi.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if a device like the Note 4 will have support for the carrier aggression, or if we'll have to wait longer.

now let's not get hasty...no need for carrier, "aggression" [emoji6]

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if a device like the Note 4 will have support for the carrier aggression, or if we'll have to wait longer.

 

EDIT: aggregation

 

:)

 

With respect to the aggregation of 20 MHz TDD LTE carriers:

 

SD 805 = 2 carriers

SD 808/810 = 3 carriers (Q1 2015)

 

The Note 4 will almost certainly use the SD 805. If they also manage to include B4 and B12 LTE in the Sprint version, it will be a very attractive device.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sprint site is saying Spark will be available to about 100 top cities and is available in 20 markets now. I hope that is not all they plan on deploying.

 

Sent from my HTC M8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sprint site is saying Spark will be available to about 100 top cities and is available in 20 markets now. I hope that is not all they plan on deploying.

 

Sent from my HTC M8

No, its going on every single sprint site, it will  be on the top 100 markets by the end of this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vygevavy.jpgThe Sprint website only commits to about 100 cities over the next 3 years

 

Sent from my HTC M8

Like I said in the Happy Connecting thread, a typo that someone rushed.

 

The press release states 100 cities by year end.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said in the Happy Connecting thread, a typo that someone rushed.

 

The press release states 100 cities by year end.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Are we confusing 100 markets and 100Million POP??? this is a quote by John Saw from a few months ago,

 

"Sprint plans to expand Spark to 100 million POPs by the end of this year and roughly 100 markets by 2016"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we confusing 100 markets and 100Million POP??? this is a quote by John Saw from a few months ago,

 

"Sprint plans to expand Spark to 100 million POPs by the end of this year and roughly 100 markets by 2016"

 

That might be. How many people live in the top 100 markets in the nation?

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...