Jump to content

Google Nexus 5 by LG Preview (LG D820)


MacinJosh

Recommended Posts

The problem is if the Nexus 5 lacks engineering screens -- like the Nexus 4 last year -- then it is not suitable for wireless network tracking. It is basically an iPhone for the Android crowd.

 

AJ

 

Believe it or not, there's a whole gamut of capabilities in between wireless spectrum analyzer and iPhone. I would hesitate to claim that any phone lacking an engineering screen is the equivalent of the most locked-down phone on the planet... especially when the device in question is arguably the most hackable phone on the market, intended for developers...

 

ETA: [but I digress.]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Believe it or not, there's a whole gamut of capabilities in between wireless spectrum analyzer and iPhone.

 

As someone who spent $1700 out of pocket for a spectrum analyzer to conduct S4GRU research, I do not think that you are in position to lecture me on that stated "gamut of capabilities."  I am well aware.  And I stand by my assertion.  If it does not have internal engineering screens, then it does not pass the wireless network tracking litmus test.  It is just a general use handset.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As someone who spent $1700 out of pocket for a spectrum analyzer to conduct S4GRU research, I do not think that you are in position to lecture me on that stated "gamut of capabilities."  I am well aware.  And I stand by my assertion.  If it does not have internal engineering screens, then it does not pass the wireless network tracking litmus test.  It is just a general use handset.

 

AJ

 

Without getting too far into this, I'm well aware you know what you're talking about. That's why your statement, likely to be influential here, that it's "basically an iPhone for the Android crowd" should be, at the very least, given some context.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To those who have a Nexus 4:  Is the Nexus 4 camera really as bad as some make it out to be?  Some say that the Nexus 5 camera will barely be an improvement over the supposedly-crummy N4 camera.

 

Is the N4 camera really that bad?  Regardless, for those who know about camera's than I do, do the specs for the Nexus 5 camera suggest that it will be crummy, average, above average, or awesome?  I'm guessing not "awesome" because of the lower pixel count.  I hear that OIS allows the camera to keep the shutter open longer, which helps in lower light situations.

 

For reference, I have an original Evo 4G which is also an 8 megapixel camera.  To my untrained eye, outdoor pictures are usually pretty good, but indoor and low-light photos are grainy and sometimes unfocused.

 

Can I safely assume that the Nexus 5 camera will be a clear upgrade over my Evo's camera?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with you. The IR blaster on the G2 doesn't do a whole lot for me (I prefer my harmony ultimate). If it's only available through sprint channels I may reconsider and put my focus back on the G2. Hows the 4G up in Brunswick?

What about the battery?  I thought it was 2300mAH for the Nexus and 3000mAh for the G2.  Initial reports in the G2 users thread say the battery is good but not amazing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figure the LG bloatware will cost about 700mAH battery per day, so I'm personally calling it a draw. You can make that decision on your own though on what the software will burn through.

I assume you mean software mods too, because there is no way a few bloatware apps use 700 mah per day.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without getting too far into this, I'm well aware you know what you're talking about. That's why your statement, likely to be influential here, that it's "basically an iPhone for the Android crowd" should be, at the very least, given some context.

 

I think describing a Nexus handset as "an iPhone for the Android crowd" is pretty apropos.  Those people want the standard OS -- just like with iOS.  And they get ridiculously obsessed with having access to the latest OS updates -- just like with iOS.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think describing a Nexus handset as "an iPhone for the Android crowd" is pretty apropos.  Those people want the standard OS -- just like with iOS.  And they get ridiculously obsessed with having access to the latest OS updates -- just like with iOS.

 

AJ

I think your underestimating googles interpretation of the perfect vision of Android OS, that's why the nexus line exist. Not to downplay that the lack of engineering screen as being a huge downer. But, this phone strikes an excellent balance between specs, software and hack-ability, and to compare with a phone that cant even map on sensorly, is somewhat unjust in my opinion.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just bought a Spigen case for the Nexus 5. It will be my next phone. My plan was to buy it with no contract and if i dont see an improvement on the Sprint network i would jump ship to ATT. Do you think if Sprint sells it that it will be locked to their network?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with you. The IR blaster on the G2 doesn't do a whole lot for me (I prefer my harmony ultimate). If it's only available through sprint channels I may reconsider and put my focus back on the G2. Hows the 4G up in Brunswick?

4g>  that's funny..i'm lucky to have anything at all.  Fredco here in maryland is not even 50% nv started...i have not been able to ascertain the holdup..but it would not surprise me if the GOBN is screwing with sprint here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think your underestimating googles interpretation of the perfect vision of Android OS, that's why the nexus line exist. Not to downplay that the lack of engineering screen as being a huge downer.

 

Well, to be clear, we cannot confirm the absence of engineering screens.  Previous Sprint variant Nexus devices did include them, but those devices were all sold on contract.

 

I suspect the tradeoff in this case will be off contract sales versus engineering screens.  Any Nexus 5 sold through Google Play probably will lack engineering screens -- just as the Nexus 4 did last year.  However, if Sprint sells the Nexus 5 directly, it probably will include engineering screens.  Of course, the tradeoff likely will be cost, since Sprint is apt to sell the $350 handset for $200 on contract.  Not a good deal.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, to be clear, we cannot confirm the absence of engineering screens.  Previous Sprint variant Nexus devices did include them, but those devices were all sold on contract.

 

I suspect the tradeoff in this case will be off contract sales versus engineering screens.  Any Nexus 5 sold through Google Play probably will lack engineering screens -- just as the Nexus 4 did last year.  However, if Sprint sells the Nexus 5 directly, it probably will include engineering screens.  Of course, the tradeoff likely will be cost, since Sprint is apt to sell the $350 handset for $200 on contract.  Not a good deal.

 

AJ

Hmm, that's an interesting take, considering that i don't plan on leaving sprint anytime soon, I would consider the locked sold-through-Sprint version of the phone as long as the subsidized price isn't outrageous ($199 would not be good for a $350 phone but maybe would be for a 32gb version vs 16gb) but I guess we will know the answer to those questions soon enough.

Edited by nexgencpu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, that's an interesting take, considering that i don't plan on leaving sprint anytime soon, I would consider the locked sold-through-Sprint version of the phone as long as the subsidized price isn't outrageous ($199 would not be good for a $350 phone but maybe would be for a 32gb version vs 16gb) but I guess we will know the answer to those questions soon enough.

 

Yes, the best of both worlds scenario would be for the Nexus 5 to be sold exclusively or additionally through Google Play -- and because Sprint is on board this time -- engineering screens come along for the ride.  Keep your fingers crossed.

 

I have an LG G2 on order.  I might end up with an HTC One max instead or in addition.  But if the Nexus 5 with engineering screens is available off contract for $350, I will likely pick one up as well for testing purposes.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some new leaks and pictures:

 

Nexus-5-1-487x650.jpg

 

And we all know the value of benchmarks, but this is promising nonetheless...

 

BaseMark X is a cross-platform benchmark, which aims to test how good a device is for gaming. As it turns out the LG Nexus 5 scores 8% higher than its LG G2 sibling running on pretty much the same internals but with Android 4.2.2 in charge of operations. The Nexus 5 is also twice as fast as its Nexus 4 predecessor, but that is to be expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some new leaks and pictures:

 

 

And we all know the value of benchmarks, but this is promising nonetheless...

Do they take these pictures with potatoes?

 

Any decent smartphone would take clearer pictures. These are so grainy and horrible. But the phone does look nice.

 

 

-Luis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No specific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...