Jump to content

Softbank - New Sprint - Discussion


linhpham2

Recommended Posts

The ambiguities in that article are massive.  I still expect Network Vision 1.0 to be 95 percent complete by this time next year, and progress points toward that end.  But TD-LTE 2600 taken in house -- now that the SoftBank-Sprint-Clearwire tie up is final -- is a whole new ball of wax.  And that is what I think the article may reflect.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Band 3 is actually a superset of band 4 so it's useful for Verizon (I think).

I don't see how this could be true. band 3 is commonly referred to as 1800 with the upload at 1710 - 1785 and download 1805 -1880 whereas band 4's upload is within band 3 it's download is ~300 MHz off. A more accurate description would be band 4 is a mismatch of bands 1 and 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how this could be true. band 3 is commonly referred to as 1800 with the upload at 1710 - 1785 and download 1805 -1880 whereas band 4's upload is within band 3 it's download is ~300 MHz off. A more accurate description would be band 4 is a mismatch of bands 1 and 3.

Oops.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm. Does softy plan to have 100% of sprint? http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N0G70D720130806?irpc=43 Maybe it'll use any plunges in sprint stock as buying opportunities.

Hmmm "bought an additional 0.73 percent of Sprint Corp's common stock" Yup looks like they are going all in S L O W L Y.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Softbank is taking advantage of cheap stock.  They clearly believe the stock will take a massive jump in the future and Son believes he will make money.  There isn't much to gain in increased ownership other than minimization of opposing voices should they decide to chase some big endeavor with Sprint.   Still, doesn't much matter. 

 

Sprint's NV schedule has always poured into 2014.  This is an industry that will use the word "summer" when talking about August and September.  Anyone who thought Sprint meant "January or February" of 2014 when they said "early 2014", well, they got you.  I would expect to see them working through the entire year just to get through NV 1.0.  Even then, we will still have customers who wander here to ask us why there is no 800mhz voice or LTE on their nearby site or ask why they haven't gotten the super fast data sprint is talking about on TV once they start marketing Clear's deployed spectrum.  There is no panacea of network glory waiting for sprint , no giant red button to push and announce "we're done!"   When you consider the active number of LTE devices on the network in comparison now to the number of 3G only devices and then contrast that against the time it will take to get tri-band device saturation, the NV relief is even more metered.        

 

 My point is this:  I don't like ambiguous expectations that press releases about being "finished" at any point in the next two years set for customers, the media, competitors, or care/sales people.  

 

Ahhh... and Dish.   Charlie can't possibly believe that after his xenophobic, anti Asian rants against Son that Son will for some reason be CALLING HIM to discuss a deal that is slanted in Charlie's favor (the only one he would sign) and offers Sprint peanuts?    I suspect the Captain has sent some vague memo over to Hesse "lets discuss our mutual goals" and been absolutely ignored, else Ergen wouldn't be saying such rosy things now.  Hell, he wouldn't be talking about Sprint at all since he has such an aversion to admitting failure.    The ONLY reason a deal with Ergen would remotely make sense is if it keeps him away from Tmobile, should that really be where sprint's eye is in the future.  If Charlie becomes fuhrer of Tmobile, he becomes Captain Wacko and enemy #1 for Sprint.  He would probably even keep that magpie Legere  just to work the crowds. Now simmer on that duo. 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Ahhh... and Dish.   

 

Found an in-depth interview with Ergen and his options from the Denver Biz Journal: http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/blog/boosters_bits/2013/08/dishs-thwarted-sprint-bid-made-money.html?page=all

 

"But forging partnerships with wireless companies is another a way for Dish to build the mobile network it wants. On that front, the SoftBank-controlled Sprint appeals to Dish for its network — largely due to the Clearwire frequencies it owns — and because of SoftBank’s “tremendous expertise and creativity. They seem very innovative and very creative, and they seems they’re more aggressive than others in the wireless industry,” Ergen said, adding SoftBank seems like a kindred spirit to Dish in how it does business. 

 

If anything, the tussle with SoftBank for control of Sprint left Ergen and Dish more convinced Sprint would be a good fit as a wireless partner. “We actually probably understand Sprint and Clearwire better than we understand any of the other operators,” Ergen said. Ergen admitted to being a little jealous of SoftBank and impressed by it, and he suggested that makes Sprint all the more attractive as a potential partner. “I like people who are better than us,” he said. “I want to hire people who are better than us, and I want to work with people who are better than us."

 

Saying nice things about SoftBank may not smooth over all the ill will Dish Network created trying to break apart SoftBank and Sprint’s merger. Dish Network’s counterbid cost SoftBank and Sprint billions in added costs and delayed infrastructure investment. Dish also made what Sprint considered xenphobic arguments against the SoftBank deal in filings to the FCC and in letters to members of Congress. Dish suggested SoftBank’s business interests in China, and a subsidiary’s past involvement in a U.S. bribery investigation, made SoftBank and its chairman, Masayoshi Son, potential risks to U.S. national security if they controlled Sprint. Dish was the all-American alternative, it argued.

 

So what merger options remain for Dish in the wireless industry?

"That’s really probably only T-Mobile at this time.” Ergen said."

 

More on T-mobile combo at the WSJ: http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2013/08/06/charlie-ergens-dish-has-long-list-of-potential-ma-moves/

 

"Ergen acknowledged that if he can’t get a partnership with Sprint, the only possible acquisition after all the consolidation in the industry would be T-Mobile. He said the “network upgrade” for T-Mobile would be “much simpler” than what needs to be done at Sprint and that T-Mobile has a “lot of momentum” amid all the industry turbulence.

“I think there’s still a lot of opportunity for us,” he said. “And I think that opportunity – certainly, T-Mobile, you could put that together with Dish in a number of ways, including acquisition and merger, and that’s probably not possible with the other wireless providers.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found an in-depth interview with Ergen and his options from the Denver Biz Journal: http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/blog/boosters_bits/2013/08/dishs-thwarted-sprint-bid-made-money.html?page=all

 

"But forging partnerships with wireless companies is another a way for Dish to build the mobile network it wants. On that front, the SoftBank-controlled Sprint appeals to Dish for its network — largely due to the Clearwire frequencies it owns — and because of SoftBank’s “tremendous expertise and creativity. They seem very innovative and very creative, and they seems they’re more aggressive than others in the wireless industry,” Ergen said, adding SoftBank seems like a kindred spirit to Dish in how it does business.

If anything, the tussle with SoftBank for control of Sprint left Ergen and Dish more convinced Sprint would be a good fit as a wireless partner. “We actually probably understand Sprint and Clearwire better than we understand any of the other operators,” Ergen said. Ergen admitted to being a little jealous of SoftBank and impressed by it, and he suggested that makes Sprint all the more attractive as a potential partner. “I like people who are better than us,” he said. “I want to hire people who are better than us, and I want to work with people who are better than us."

Saying nice things about SoftBank may not smooth over all the ill will Dish Network created trying to break apart SoftBank and Sprint’s merger. Dish Network’s counterbid cost SoftBank and Sprint billions in added costs and delayed infrastructure investment. Dish also made what Sprint considered xenphobic arguments against the SoftBank deal in filings to the FCC and in letters to members of Congress. Dish suggested SoftBank’s business interests in China, and a subsidiary’s past involvement in a U.S. bribery investigation, made SoftBank and its chairman, Masayoshi Son, potential risks to U.S. national security if they controlled Sprint. Dish was the all-American alternative, it argued.

 

So what merger options remain for Dish in the wireless industry?

"That’s really probably only T-Mobile at this time.” Ergen said."

More on T-mobile combo at the WSJ: http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2013/08/06/charlie-ergens-dish-has-long-list-of-potential-ma-moves/

"Ergen acknowledged that if he can’t get a partnership with Sprint, the only possible acquisition after all the consolidation in the industry would be T-Mobile. He said the “network upgrade” for T-Mobile would be “much simpler” than what needs to be done at Sprint and that T-Mobile has a “lot of momentum” amid all the industry turbulence.

“I think there’s still a lot of opportunity for us,” he said. “And I think that opportunity – certainly, T-Mobile, you could put that together with Dish in a number of ways, including acquisition and merger, and that’s probably not possible with the other wireless providers.”

The problem with dish-TMO combo is that TMO doesn't have fiber to tower exactly where Charlie needs it: semi rural areas where people don't have concast, uverse, et al. Putting his 20x20 band 23 on TMO's urban towers and marketing the TV Internet bundle will crash and fail cause even 150mbps per sector OF CAPACITY is not enough for urbania, though it might be for TMO's current 2g 15k rural tower customers who are stuck on 1.5 Mbps dsl if they're lucky.

 

So how many billions would it take to bring FTTT to all 15k towers? More importantly, how much time? Even if they started today and used microwave as much as they could -in place of FTTT - is the tv Internet bundle compelling enough for dish to at least recoup its investment in 10 years?

The average speeds aren't gonna be that high but for a rural person, it might be fantastic compared to dsl.

Edited by qpotlk1134
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about adding enough carriers to finally meet "true 4G" LTE-A standards of peak speeds of at least 100 Mbps? Or raising the data caps on hotspots and tethering beyond the current paltry 12GB?

 

 

"Junk" status, really? If that's true the ratings agencies don't know what they're talking about. If you count wholesale subscribers, their subscriber count is rapidly growing. There seems to be a new Sprint MVNO every other day...

 

 

This is why I've been saying a Dish-TMUS deal is the most likely outcome. It's T-Mo or bust for Ergen, and I don't see the FCC and DoJ turning such a deal down. The feds won't let a Dish-DirecTV merger happen, and there's no love lost between Dish and SoftBank at the moment.

 

With all that spectrum, I would be super happy if they gave hotspots and tether plans that were unlimited and throttled say to 5Mbps. Throttling is not a bad thing if it is not throttled down to 2g/3g speeds like what tmobile used to do. If will keep bandwidth relatively free and keep customers happy with usable speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

90% owned by Carlson family. Good luck.

Don't know the history but it's losing so why should owner ship by one family matter?

 

U.S. Cellular (NYSE:USM) continued on its trajectory over the last several quarters of selling smartphones and losing customers, as the Tier 2 carrier struggles to break out of a pattern that is seeing its subscriber base dwindle.

 

Read more: U.S. Cellular sells more smartphones, still loses 127K subs in Q2 - FierceWireless http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/us-cellular-sells-more-smartphones-still-loses-127k-subs-q2/2013-08-02#ixzz2bt8jApWY

Subscribe at FierceWireless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint has A LOT of excess capacity.

 

Sprint should be able to grow revenue, given that they have 35% of industry capacity in a capacity constrained market with just 15% of industry revenues," wrote New Street's Chaplin. "Sprint will use its capacity and network speed advantage to take share. If they gain 5% of share in five years, they would create an additional $6.92/share in value."

 

Read more: M&A catches fire: 24M wireless subscribers moving from Tier 2 to Tier 1 carriers - FierceWireless http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/ma-catches-fire-24m-wireless-subscribers-moving-tier-2-tier-1-carriers/2013-08-12#ixzz2btDZ48no

Subscribe at FierceWireless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be awesome, them and Ntelos. But doesn't us cell have the same spectrum as vzw (700/850/1700/1900/2100) so idk how sprint will benefit from buying them. I guess more 1900 will be nice

 

They have some PCS that would be valuable, the main thing is it would add to Sprint's coverage area. *IF* it would actually happen. Nothing right at this moment is pointing to that as far as I can tell.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be awesome, them and Ntelos. But doesn't us cell have the same spectrum as vzw (700/850/1700/1900/2100) so idk how sprint will benefit from buying them. I guess more 1900 will be nice

700 is useless A block.

850 is good.

1700/2100 AWS is useful but sprint wouldn't own enough to make it worth it.

1900 pcs very useful.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...