twospirits Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 I do believe the State Attorney General case is still ongoing. It's two different things if i am not mistaken. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiWavelength Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 Yeah, that's standard and the date for the next major Planogram... Hey, what do you call a telegram delivered to someone in a major northern Dallas suburb? A Planogram. AJ 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COZisBack Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 Hey, what do you call a telegram delivered to someone in a major northern Dallas suburb? A Planogram. AJ Yeah uuuhhhh. Go ahead and move this over to the really bad joke thread. Today's post has been brought to you by Sprint, the letters GN and the number 2. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnHovah Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 Yeah, that's standard and the date for the next major Planogram adjustment for the holiday season leading to Christmas. It also does not prevent Sprint from stopping the plan offering or changing it any earlier than that. It's just the expiration date for the advertising period. Interesting thing is that you can still see the "normal" old plans although the site does its damnedest to minimize exposure to them. I tried to see what would happen if I altered my plann (while logged in) and also as a new customer. It seems that unless you are paying close attention you may miss the link for "other plans" In any event, I still hate that retail/marketing term plan-o-gram! seriously???! can we not come up with something better in this day an age? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halcyoncmdr Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Interesting thing is that you can still see the "normal" old plans although the site does its damnedest to minimize exposure to them. I tried to see what would happen if I altered my plann (while logged in) and also as a new customer. It seems that unless you are paying close attention you may miss the link for "other plans" In any event, I still hate that retail/marketing term plan-o-gram! seriously???! can we not come up with something better in this day an age? Planogram is a recognized word in the Oxford English dictionary... it's not really going anywhere any time soon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planogram http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/planogram 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dedub Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-envisions-completing-network-vision-mid-2014/2013-08-06 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maximus1987/lou99 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-envisions-completing-network-vision-mid-2014/2013-08-06 Sprint's name is actually Starburst II lol http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/101830/000010183013000038/sprintq2201310-q.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cletus Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-envisions-completing-network-vision-mid-2014/2013-08-06 Well, at least they have come out and stated what we all knew was true. Network vision is taking longer than anticipated for reasons partially out of Sprint's control. I'm not too concerned though as what I am really looking forward to is the addition of Clearwire towers and 800 mhz spectrum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericdabbs Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Well, at least they have come out and stated what we all knew was true. Network vision is taking longer than anticipated for reasons partially out of Sprint's control. I'm not too concerned though as what I am really looking forward to is the addition of Clearwire towers and 800 mhz spectrum. Exactly. Its about time Sprint admit that they will not be largely complete Network Vision by the end of 2013. At this point its still questionable if they can get it largely complete by mid 2014 given how slow backhaul is coming to these sites. Also it doesn't help that Sprint has ALU as one of their vendors who tends to be pretty slow with bringing on LTE to the major metro markets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maximus1987/lou99 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Exactly. Its about time Sprint admit that they will not be largely complete Network Vision by the end of 2013. At this point its still questionable if they can get it largely complete by mid 2014 given how slow backhaul is coming to these sites. Also it doesn't help that Sprint has ALU as one of their vendors who tends to be pretty slow with bringing on LTE to the major metro markets.They've already admitted it when they said, months ago, they'd have 200 mil instead of 250 mil LTE pops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marioc21 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Sprint's name is actually Starburst II lol http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/101830/000010183013000038/sprintq2201310-q.htm True, it was. But subsequent to the merger closing, Starburst II was renamed Sprint Corporation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnHovah Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Planogram is a recognized word in the Oxford English dictionary... it's not really going anywhere any time soon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planogram http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/planogram That may be the case, but much like the term "irregardless", I still find it to be a bastardization of the language. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linhpham2 Posted August 6, 2013 Author Share Posted August 6, 2013 We haven't seen the last of Ergen: http://money.msn.com/business-news/article.aspx?feed=OBR&date=20130806&id=16778075 "Dish Network Corp Chairman Charlie Ergen kept investors guessing about his next strategic move on Tuesday by keeping the door open to everything from a possible partnership with Sprint Corp to tie-ups with either T-Mobile US or DirecTV. I think in an ironic sort of way Sprint becomes an interesting potential partner for us," Ergen said, as he heaped praise on the company and its majority owner SoftBank and noted that he had found out a lot about Sprint when he took a look at its books as part of his efforts to buy the company." Sprint has so much extra spectrum in a lot of markets, it might be worthwhile to see what Ergen has planned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maximus1987/lou99 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 We haven't seen the last of Ergen: http://money.msn.com/business-news/article.aspx?feed=OBR&date=20130806&id=16778075 "Dish Network Corp Chairman Charlie Ergen kept investors guessing about his next strategic move on Tuesday by keeping the door open to everything from a possible partnership with Sprint Corp to tie-ups with either T-Mobile US or DirecTV. I think in an ironic sort of way Sprint becomes an interesting potential partner for us," Ergen said, as he heaped praise on the company and its majority owner SoftBank and noted that he had found out a lot about Sprint when he took a look at its books as part of his efforts to buy the company." Sprint has so much extra spectrum in a lot of markets, it might be worthwhile to see what Ergen has planned As a partner to sprint? Sure. If he pays to sprint the $3 bil it cost it and to softy the $1 bil it incurred cause of Charlie's games. That'd be on top of fees for Network hosting. Charlie is desperate because he is losing to directv AND Feds won't let them merge. Let him buy Tmobile. He can't make it worse than it currently is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linhpham2 Posted August 6, 2013 Author Share Posted August 6, 2013 As a partner to sprint? Sure. If he pays to sprint the $3 bil it cost it and to softy the $1 bil it incurred cause of Charlie's games. That'd be on top of fees for Network hosting. Charlie is desperate because he is losing to directv AND Feds won't let them merge. Let him buy Tmobile. He can't make it worse than it currently is. Instead of cash, I'd rather Dish stays out of the PCS H auction and gives Sprint some other nearby spectrum as compensation. Sprint is desperate for revenue. If it can't get new subscribers to replace those fleeing, then why not host Dish spectrum? What else are they going to do with all that excess 2.5 spectrum? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiWavelength Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Planogram is a recognized word in the Oxford English dictionary... it's not really going anywhere any time soon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planogram http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/planogram But it is not capitalized in the middle of a sentence. Otherwise, it points to a certain city in northern Texas. AJ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maximus1987/lou99 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 (edited) Sprint is desperate for revenue. If it can't get new subscribers to replace those fleeing, then why not host Dish spectrum? What else are they going to do with all that excess 2.5 spectrum?Sprint is NOT desperate for revenue with daddy soft bucks. Excess 2.5? Who said there will be any excess? As Robert said, if dish truly wanted a deal to host its spectrum, it would've made a deal with sprint following the exit of Lightsquared. But dish wants crazy generous terms that not even flailing sprint agreed to, let alone current sprint. Would you like to work with someone that cost you $1 bil and $3bil in network investments if you didn't have to? Also, your statement "what are they gonna do with excess 2.5" is relevant to Dish's spectrum how? If you mean "what is dish gonna do with its AWS-4 spectrum" then I hope the answer is "rot" and lose the billions Charlie paid for those licenses when the FCC confiscates them for his failure to meet buildout deadlines. He's probably banking on ATT buying AWS-4 but ATT already had the 10x10 WCS that its bringing next year which should be enough. Edited August 6, 2013 by qpotlk1134 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supert0nes Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Instead of cash, I'd rather Dish stays out of the PCS H auction and gives Sprint some other nearby spectrum as compensation. Sprint is desperate for revenue. If it can't get new subscribers to replace those fleeing, then why not host Dish spectrum? What else are they going to do with all that excess 2.5 spectrum? Dish already stated yesterday I think they aren't very interested in H with all the restrictions the FCC put on it. I say that the original Lightsquared style partnership is the only smidgen of hope Charlie has. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maximus1987/lou99 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Dish already stated yesterday I think they aren't very interested in H with all the restrictions the FCC put on it. I say that the original Lightsquared style partnership is the only smidgen of hope Charlie has. Or Tmobile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linhpham2 Posted August 6, 2013 Author Share Posted August 6, 2013 Sprint is NOT desperate for revenue with daddy soft bucks. Excess 2.5? Who said there will be any excess? As Robert said, if dish truly wanted a deal to host its spectrum, it would've made a deal with sprint following the exit of Lightsquared. But dish wants crazy generous terms that not even flailing sprint agreed to, let alone current sprint. Would you like to work with someone that cost you $1 bil and $3bil in network investments if you didn't have to? Also, your statement "what are they gonna do with excess 2.5" is relevant to Dish's spectrum how? If you mean "what is dish gonna do with its AWS-4 spectrum" then I hope the answer is "rot" and lose the billions Charlie paid for those licenses when the FCC confiscates them for his failure to meet buildout deadlines. Excess spectrum = Sprint has almost 2x spectrum compared to Verizon and AT&T, separately. And half as many customers. What other uses will Sprint use the spectrum for? Softbank and Sprint's debt are, IIRC, almost junk-rated. Sprint needs revenue to pay off its debt, network upgrades, etc. And Sprint's overall subscriber count is still dropping... Dish has spectrum with buildout requirements, there's not many options for who it can partner with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maximus1987/lou99 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 (edited) Excess spectrum = Sprint has almost 2x spectrum compared to Verizon and AT&T, separately. And half as many customers. What other uses will Sprint use the spectrum for? Softbank and Sprint's debt are, IIRC, almost junk-rated. Sprint needs revenue to pay off its debt, network upgrades, etc. And Sprint's overall subscriber count is still dropping... Dish has spectrum with buildout requirements, there's not many options for who it can partner with. What does sprint's spectrum have anything to do with hosting Dish's spectrum? Dish's is FDD band 24 and sprint's is FDD 25, 26 and TDD 41. Edited August 6, 2013 by qpotlk1134 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linhpham2 Posted August 6, 2013 Author Share Posted August 6, 2013 What does sprint's spectrum have anything to do with hosting Dish's spectrum? Nothing. But they aren't mutually exclusive. I'm just saying that Dish might have some use for some of Sprint's spectrum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maximus1987/lou99 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 (edited) Nothing. But they aren't mutually exclusive. I'm just saying that Dish might have some use for some of Sprint's spectrum.HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Son had no care for Dish's uses for TDD 41 spectrum. Dish cost him $1 bil and $3 bil in network upgrade funds. That's A LOT of money. Have you looked at Softy's q2 investor slides? Its current debt to equity ratio is still WAY below why it was when it bought Vodafone Japan. What does Son plan on doing with that spectrum? Umm. Maybe getting more customers? Edited August 6, 2013 by qpotlk1134 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rawvega Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-envisions-completing-network-vision-mid-2014/2013-08-06 I'm not really sure how to reconcile these two statements from the article: Sprint plans to finish its deployment of its Network Vision network equipment by the middle of 2014, later than it had previously indicated The carrier has never given an exact date for when it would finish its Network Vision deployment on 38,000 cell sites No matter I suppose. The original, ORIGINAL estimates for the completion of Network Vision was 5 years or some time in 2017 as I recall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnoj Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Excess spectrum = Sprint has almost 2x spectrum compared to Verizon and AT&T, separately. And half as many customers. What other uses will Sprint use the spectrum for? How about adding enough carriers to finally meet "true 4G" LTE-A standards of peak speeds of at least 100 Mbps? Or raising the data caps on hotspots and tethering beyond the current paltry 12GB? Softbank and Sprint's debt are, IIRC, almost junk-rated. Sprint needs revenue to pay off its debt, network upgrades, etc. And Sprint's overall subscriber count is still dropping... "Junk" status, really? If that's true the ratings agencies don't know what they're talking about. If you count wholesale subscribers, their subscriber count is rapidly growing. There seems to be a new Sprint MVNO every other day... Dish has spectrum with buildout requirements, there's not many options for who it can partner with. This is why I've been saying a Dish-TMUS deal is the most likely outcome. It's T-Mo or bust for Ergen, and I don't see the FCC and DoJ turning such a deal down. The feds won't let a Dish-DirecTV merger happen, and there's no love lost between Dish and SoftBank at the moment. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.