Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Here is a little something for, as Bill Cosby would say, "the young people"...

 

 

AJ

 

 

Sounds about right. "I crashed my car into a bridge. I DON'T CARE!"

Posted

Sounds about right. "I crashed my car into a bridge. I DON'T CARE!"

 

In your case, I hope that it was not the Brooklyn Bridge, Manhattan Bridge, nor Williamsburg Bridge.  Those are iconic structures.  Or, should I say, "Icona" structures...

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Posted

As for the extra statement fee, I could never get sprint to mail me only one statement. Each month I'd get four or five identical statements. No one at Sprint could fix it, so I finally switched to ebills.

Posted (edited)

It means SoftBank has big things planned. From what I understand they are looking at synergies in structure between both networks and trying to find out what works for both companies. They seem to believe the U.S. and Japan operate the same way. They want Sprint to become more like them in that they don't want to be seen as the the cell company.

 

Rather than focus on T-Mobile, he is already going for the big guys, AT&T and Verizon.

 

I absolutely love it!

Synergies between which two networks? Softbank in Japan and Sprint in America?

 

I think it simply means they're not gonna behave like dicks but more like google, the "cool" company.

Edited by bluespruce1901
Posted

Synergies between which two networks? Softbank in Japan and Sprint in America?I think it simply means they're not gonna behave like dicks but more like google, the "cool" company.

The main 'synergy' with Sprint and SoftBank is to get more hardware/smartphone OEM's to support TD-LTE 2600. Other than that, under the current structures of both companies, there is not much synergy between Sprint and SoftBank. But as they make Sprint organized more and more like SoftBank, that may change.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Not sure what that one post implies about Sprint being an Internet company and the big 2 are telecommunications companies. I hope Son doesnt push Sprint as a content delivery service.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

If Softy wanted to eventually buy TMO, a smart way to go about it is to do a network sharing deal first.

 

All the Sprint phones that have HSPA+, offload off of EVDO and onto HSPA+. And get TMO to ditch the 10 MHz it's using for GSM and replace it with LTE; all Sprint phones will instantly have faster LTE (capacity).

Posted

If Softy wanted to eventually buy TMO, a smart way to go about it is to do a network sharing deal first.

 

All the Sprint phones that have HSPA+, offload off of EVDO and onto HSPA+. And get TMO to ditch the 10 MHz it's using for GSM and replace it with LTE; all Sprint phones will instantly have faster LTE (capacity).

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-33-spectrum-analysis-part-twosprint-and-t-mobile-spare-pcs-spectrum-would-pair-nicely-for-a-lte-partnership/

 

AJ

Posted

Yes, I remember reading that. Why don't they do it? They don't have to get FCC permission like in Europia.

 

First off, keep in mind that AJ's article was written before Tmobile announced their new Challenger strategy which changed their strategy of what technologies are going to be deployed on their AWS and PCS spectrum holdings.  At the time, Tmobile deployed HSPA+ on AWS and GSM on PCS and Tmobile did not have a strategy to move to LTE given it just came out of the failed ATT/Tmobile merger.  This LTE network sharing partnership idea would have been great for both companies had Tmobile not decide to deploy its own LTE.

 

However, given the new direction of Tmobile from the Challenger strategy to deploy AWS for LTE and maximize their PCS spectrum for HSPA+, I don't see this happening anymore.  At this point, both companies have gone far in their separate directions and Sprint needs to focus on their own network to deploy LTE on 800/1900/2500 and not worry about creating a LTE network sharing partnership.

  • Like 4
Posted

First off, keep in mind that AJ's article was written before Tmobile announced their new Challenger strategy which changed their strategy of what technologies are going to be deployed on their AWS and PCS spectrum holdings. At the time, Tmobile deployed HSPA+ on AWS and GSM on PCS and Tmobile did not have a strategy to move to LTE given it just came out of the failed ATT/Tmobile merger so this LTE network sharing partnership idea would have been great for both companies.

 

However, given the new direction of Tmobile from the Challenger strategy to deploy AWS for LTE and maximize their PCS spectrum for HSPA+, I don't see this happening anymore. At this point, both companies have gone far in their separate directions and Sprint needs to focus on their own network to deploy LTE on 800/1900/2500 and not worry about creating a LTE network sharing partnership.

If Tmobile gets rid of GSM, they'll have 5x5 for LTE. As more people get LTE phones, it can replace pcs HSPA with LTE. There's your synergy.
Posted

If Tmobile gets rid of GSM, they'll have 5x5 for LTE. As more people get LTE phones, it can replace pcs HSPA with LTE. There's your synergy.

 

Getting rid of GSM for Tmobile won't occur still for several years.  I don't see Tmobile deploying or refarming PCS spectrum for LTE until it has exhausted all available AWS spectrum resources for LTE.  Since there is upcoming AWS-3 spectrum for auction in the next year or 2, you can bet that Tmobile will try to expand their AWS holdings as their main spectrum band for LTE.

 

What Tmobile needs to do is phase out all HSPA+ on AWS spectrum and shift all HSPA+ to PCS spectrum.  Then Tmobile can extend their 5x5 LTE markets in AWS to at least 10x10 LTE in many markets to provide more relief.  Tmobile has been refarming PCS spectrum for HSPA+ since early 2012 at the same time as they deploy LTE on AWS spectrum.  Unfortunately Tmobile for the time being has to keep a HSPA+ carrier on AWS due to older smartphones (pre 2012) that can only connect to HSPA+ on AWS spectrum.

Posted

Getting rid of GSM for Tmobile won't occur still for several years. I don't see Tmobile deploying or refarming PCS spectrum for LTE until it has exhausted all available AWS spectrum resources for LTE. Since there is upcoming AWS-3 spectrum for auction in the next year or 2, you can bet that Tmobile will try to expand their AWS holdings as their main spectrum band for LTE.

 

What Tmobile needs to do is phase out all HSPA+ on AWS spectrum and shift all HSPA+ to PCS spectrum. Then Tmobile can extend their 5x5 LTE markets in AWS to at least 10x10 LTE in many markets to provide more relief. Tmobile has been refarming PCS spectrum for HSPA+ since early 2012 at the same time as they deploy LTE on AWS spectrum. Unfortunately Tmobile for the time being has to keep a HSPA+ carrier on AWS due to older smartphones (pre 2012) that can only connect to HSPA+ on AWS spectrum.

Tmobile has enough AWS. They need to save their money for 600 MHz. 20 MHz worth.
Posted

Not sure what that one post implies about Sprint being an Internet company and the big 2 are telecommunications companies. I hope Son doesnt push Sprint as a content delivery service. Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Sprint has to diversify it's revenue sources. It's never going to grow to the size of Verizon or AT&T on its own. Softbank's investor slides mention  utilizing "big data."

 

On slide 73, Softbank mentions its new California research center. The slide shows off a bunch of futuristic products. 

 

http://webcast.softbank.co.jp/en/results/20130730/pdf/2014q1.pdf

 

Maybe these 2 things refers to the "internet of Things" (e.g. Sprint becoming a dumb pipe for internet data?)

  • Like 1
Posted

Tmobile has enough AWS. They need to save their money for 600 MHz. 20 MHz worth.

 

Well whether Tmobile has enough AWS or not will be determined if they participate in the AWS-3 auction in the next 2 years.  I think AT&T needs the AWS-3 spectrum more than either Verizon or Tmobile but I don't like the fact that ATT would be getting more spectrum.  I agree that Tmobile's next block of spectrum they need to obtain is 600 MHz rather than more AWS.  However the fact that HSPA+ 42 requires 20 MHz (10x10 block) of bandwidth is a lot of spectrum from Tmobile's perspective.

Posted

Sprint has to diversify it's revenue sources. It's never going to grow to the size of Verizon or AT&T on its own. Softbank's investor slides mention  utilizing "big data."

 

On slide 73, Softbank mentions its new California research center. The slide shows off a bunch of futuristic products. 

 

http://webcast.softbank.co.jp/en/results/20130730/pdf/2014q1.pdf

 

Maybe these 2 things refers to the "internet of Things" (e.g. Sprint becoming a dumb pipe for internet data?)

I agree on both points but only to a degree on the latter point. I think over the next several years we will see an evening out of size amongst the national carriers.  In other words Sprint and T-Mo will grow at the expense of Verizon and AT&T.

Posted

Sprint has to diversify it's revenue sources. It's never going to grow to the size of Verizon or AT&T on its own. Softbank's investor slides mention  utilizing "big data."

 

On slide 73, Softbank mentions its new California research center. The slide shows off a bunch of futuristic products. 

 

http://webcast.softbank.co.jp/en/results/20130730/pdf/2014q1.pdf

 

Maybe these 2 things refers to the "internet of Things" (e.g. Sprint becoming a dumb pipe for internet data?)

 

Big Data is definitely a hot phrase right now.  I believe they are saying they will use Big Data technology to analyze their internal data to make better decisions regarding the network.  From what I've heard, they use a lot of Oracle Exadata appliances to house the structured "Big Data".  Not sure if they use hadoop for their unstructured data analysis.

Posted

Not sure what that one post implies about Sprint being an Internet company and the big 2 are telecommunications companies. I hope Son doesnt push Sprint as a content delivery service.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

That would certainly hit Ergen in a lowblow, but hopefully even if that is an additional focus it does not detract from the primary telecom aspect.  although I can see telecom referring to the nickel and diming of ATT and VZ with variable data, text, minute packages vs. unlimited on the AFTER-NOW network.  Masayoshi could be alluding more to the fact that the future is much more datacentric and less "telecom status-quo" and he plans to leave them in the dust.

  • Like 2
Posted

Big Data is definitely a hot phrase right now.  I believe they are saying they will use Big Data technology to analyze their internal data to make better decisions regarding the network.  From what I've heard, they use a lot of Oracle Exadata appliances to house the structured "Big Data".  Not sure if they use hadoop for their unstructured data analysis.

One of the slides (#38) had info that in Japan they have an opt in thing that tracks app data r speeds and they use that to help plan network upgrades..

 

 

P.S. when I first looked at slide 67... WTF a missile launcher?!?!?! ... its a crane.... I guess I should have kept my glasses on.  :lol:

  • Like 2
Posted

Is there an advertised date as to when the guaranteed unlimited for life will be finished!

No

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Posted

Is there an advertised date as to when the guaranteed unlimited for life will be finished!

On the eFlyers that we hand out to people interested in the new plans, it says that the current offer is good until 11/7/2013. So on November 7th, most likely what will happen is that they'll just renew the plans and keep them going, but it does give them a date to change things if stuff goes bad.

Posted

On the eFlyers that we hand out to people interested in the new plans, it says that the current offer is good until 11/7/2013. So on November 7th, most likely what will happen is that they'll just renew the plans and keep them going, but it does give them a date to change things if stuff goes bad.

 

Yeah, that's standard and the date for the next major Planogram adjustment for the holiday season leading to Christmas.

 

It also does not prevent Sprint from stopping the plan offering or changing it any earlier than that. It's just the expiration date for the advertising period.

Posted

I don't know if you guys remember but, several months ago, there was a law suit against Sprint for supposedly not paying/charging proper sales tax in NY.  Well, the SEC recently closed that investigation without action.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324653004578649840947638854.html

(Sorry if this has already been posted!)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Vinegar Hill is getting the Brooklyn Heights treatment now with regard to small cells. I mapped two more small cells in the neighborhood in the past few days so now T-Mobile is up to 8 of them in such a tiny neighborhood. While it's cool they're doing this since it means outdoors you get a consistent 400Mbps+ almost everywhere, it sucks because they're obviously deploying so many of them to make up for their lack of a macro site in the entire neighborhood. Because there isn't a macro, the small cells have a greater coverage area than you see in other neighborhoods and you often connect to them while indoors but coverage and speeds fall off indoors much faster on small cells than on macros in my experience.  Even Dish has better coverage than T-Mobile in Vinegar Hill since they added the site on top of the Extra Space Storage building alongside AT&T and Verizon. T-Mobile needs to get in line with their competitors there.
    • It seems like that is the smallest Google Play System change that google releases. I see 12 MB updates really regularly. 
    • Went back to Greenville last week and what an insane change 4 years has made! Every site in the city has n25/41/71 now and T-Mobile has even added new sites in the city since the last time I was there. As a result, their coverage and speeds are great everywhere. Unfortunately I don't have my Verizon line anymore so I'm unable to compare their performance to T-Mobile but they definitely had better coverage and speeds than AT&Tin my testing.  On the LTE side of things, T-Mobile has 5MHz Band 71, 10MHz Band 66, and 5MHz Band 2 deployed. On the 5G side, they have 190MHz n41, 15MHz n25, and 15MHz n71 deployed. As you'd expect 5G is several times faster than LTE here because of that. One thing I noticed though is that T-Mobile's speeds pretty much never go above 1Gbps here. I'm not sure if it's a backhaul limitation or if they're seriously pushing their 5G home internet product here but on most sites I was seeing 500-600Mbps with some sites having peaks in the high 800s-low 900's. I also noticed that upload speeds weren't nearly as good as they were in NYC. I attribute this to the fact that site spacing often cause the phone to drop to n25 or n71 for uploads as opposed to using n41. I have a handful of high (>100Mbps) upload speed tests but that was with me virtually right next to a site. Since I drove my own car instead of riding with family, I used the opportunity to map a ton of rural roads outside to Greenville to see what kind of coverage I'd get. T-Mobile has stepped up their game a ton in this regard as I found that coverage matched and in many cases surpassed what I was seeing on AT&T. areas where AT&T dropped to 1 bar or even no signal, I held onto weak n71 and was still able to place calls using VoNR. There are still areas where I would drop signal but those were areas where I'm certain the only carrier available was U.S. Cellular since they still have a ton of macros that they're the only tenant on. The U.S. Cellular merger won't add much to T-Mobile's spectrum coffers there; they'll increase 600MHz from 20MHz to 30MHz, gain another 10MHz of AWS, and acquire the rest of the 24GHz band, but they'll gain a ton new sites to bolster their rural coverage in this area and make it pretty much the best in the region.  — — — — — I also mapped Dish while down there. Dish's doesn't have much spectrum in Pitt County, they only have 5MHz n71, 25MHz n70 and 5MHz n29. This lack of spectrum combined with what is pretty much a skeleton/license protection network meant that in most cases I was only on 1-2 bars of n71 indoors and while outdoors I wasn't seeing speeds nearly as good as I get in NYC. While directly in front of a site I could get over 300Mbps but in most cases while out and about I wasn't seeing over 100Mbps. In fact, at my hotel I was only able to get about 5Mbps down and 2Mbps up on n71. Maybe as they densify I'll see more consistently high speeds but their lack of spectrum will remain a huge bottleneck much like it was for T-Mobile pre-Sprint merger. — — — — — AT&T and Verizon are the only carriers with small cells in Greenville. Verizon has a significantly larger deployment than AT&T though, with AT&T having it along some roads where they have weaker coverage while Verizon seems to be using them for added capacity Uptown and especially around ECU. They started being installed around 2019 but none of them have 5G as far as I can tell, only LTE. AT&T also has C-band and DoD deployed on every site in the city, giving me speeds in the range of 350-400Mbps in most areas. — — — — — Here are some photos of small cells in Greenville.  
    • Just checked and found a 12MB Google Play System update ready to download.    Still October 1 for the date after however. 
    • Looks like my little area finally has some decent mobile connectivity. Still have a few dead spots on both tmo and firstnet... https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/10549791800  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...