Jump to content

Current Sprint PRLs


halcyoncmdr

Recommended Posts

That works.

 

I'm going to try to do a comparison of 56029, 56030 (got it eventually), and 55050 some time this weekend.  I know it won't be perfect, but should be somewhat insightful, at least.

 

- Trip

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That works.

 

I'm going to try to do a comparison of 56029, 56030 (got it eventually), and 55050 some time this weekend.  I know it won't be perfect, but should be somewhat insightful, at least.

 

- Trip

We eagerly await your analysis! :)

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On my iPhone 6 I got 54050 instead of 55050???

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

54xxx based PRL's are for business accounts.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54xxx based PRL's are for business accounts.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

But I don't have a business account tho

Any idea how to change it to an individual account???

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I don't have a business account tho

Any idea how to change it to an individual account???

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's a good question. The only thing I can think of is to call customer service and see what type of account you have.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a good question. The only thing I can think of is to call customer service and see what type of account you have.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

Will do thank you very much

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will do thank you very much

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would keep it. It's not hurting anything. If anything is giving you the benefit to roam with a best provider in the area if Sprint does not have good signal... Many people would kill to get this prl with out putting any effort into it.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would keep it. It's not hurting anything. If anything is giving you the benefit to roam with a best provider in the area if Sprint does not have good signal... Many people would kill to get this prl with out putting any effort into it.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Valid point but would they still charge me for roaming ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not if you don't go over the allotment. Don't know your situation but I'm going to assume that you don't roam that much. That prl the only thing that is going to give you is 3g service only when you are roaming instead of 1x while roaming.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish that we did not have to repeat this so often.  It should be part of the general knowledge base.  A PRL has no effect on roaming charges, only on roaming airlink type and roaming indicator.  Any roaming charges are determined by the back end billing system, regardless of PRL.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the main difference between 56029 and 56030 was the removal of the Cricket CDMA/EV-DO.  There were only removals in this change, no additions and no changes from roaming to not roaming or vice versa.

 

I haven't gone line-by-line, but that seems to be the big difference.  The comparison with 55050 will be more challenging since, of course, it's a different series.  I'll do that later.

 

- Trip

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Changed my mind and tried to do it now.  The key difference between 56030 and 55050, assuming all the reductions in EV-DO are due to change from 56xxx to 55xxx, is Cellcom SIDs 362, 5652, and 5274, now have only 1X roaming, except in NID 7 where EV-DO remains.

 

- Trip

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Changed my mind and tried to do it now.  The key difference between 56030 and 55050, assuming all the reductions in EV-DO are due to change from 56xxx to 55xxx, is Cellcom SIDs 362, 5652, and 5274, now have only 1X roaming, except in NID 7 where EV-DO remains.

 

That corroborates a recent user report in this thread or another.  He was disappointed and puzzled why he received only CDMA1X roaming on Cellcom in northern Wisconsin.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes and I notice now northern WI isn't part of Roaming+ :(

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

The updated coverage map still shows Roaming+ under "3G and More"

 

?

 

Oh what!?  It looks like Appalachian Wireless is no longer on 3G roaming!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile has saved its 28Mhz mmWave licenses by using the point to point method to do environment monitoring inside its cabinets. The attachment below shows the antennas used: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp;JSESSIONID_APPSEARCH=LxvbnJuvusmIklPhKy6gVK7f9uwylrZ8LiNf3BqIKlDp3_5GxoBr!300973589!225089709?applID=14787154#   Here are the sites for Franklin county OH: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=66518254&attachmentKey=21989782&attachmentInd=applAttach
    • Yep, there is a label on the side of the box but it doesn't provide any useful info that the city doesn't already provide (Crown Castle Solutions is the franchisee). You can see my graphical interpretation of the city's dataset here.
    • T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...