Jump to content

Current Sprint PRLs


halcyoncmdr

Recommended Posts

That works.

 

I'm going to try to do a comparison of 56029, 56030 (got it eventually), and 55050 some time this weekend.  I know it won't be perfect, but should be somewhat insightful, at least.

 

- Trip

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That works.

 

I'm going to try to do a comparison of 56029, 56030 (got it eventually), and 55050 some time this weekend.  I know it won't be perfect, but should be somewhat insightful, at least.

 

- Trip

We eagerly await your analysis! :)

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On my iPhone 6 I got 54050 instead of 55050???

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

54xxx based PRL's are for business accounts.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54xxx based PRL's are for business accounts.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

But I don't have a business account tho

Any idea how to change it to an individual account???

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I don't have a business account tho

Any idea how to change it to an individual account???

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's a good question. The only thing I can think of is to call customer service and see what type of account you have.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a good question. The only thing I can think of is to call customer service and see what type of account you have.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

Will do thank you very much

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will do thank you very much

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would keep it. It's not hurting anything. If anything is giving you the benefit to roam with a best provider in the area if Sprint does not have good signal... Many people would kill to get this prl with out putting any effort into it.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would keep it. It's not hurting anything. If anything is giving you the benefit to roam with a best provider in the area if Sprint does not have good signal... Many people would kill to get this prl with out putting any effort into it.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Valid point but would they still charge me for roaming ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not if you don't go over the allotment. Don't know your situation but I'm going to assume that you don't roam that much. That prl the only thing that is going to give you is 3g service only when you are roaming instead of 1x while roaming.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish that we did not have to repeat this so often.  It should be part of the general knowledge base.  A PRL has no effect on roaming charges, only on roaming airlink type and roaming indicator.  Any roaming charges are determined by the back end billing system, regardless of PRL.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the main difference between 56029 and 56030 was the removal of the Cricket CDMA/EV-DO.  There were only removals in this change, no additions and no changes from roaming to not roaming or vice versa.

 

I haven't gone line-by-line, but that seems to be the big difference.  The comparison with 55050 will be more challenging since, of course, it's a different series.  I'll do that later.

 

- Trip

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Changed my mind and tried to do it now.  The key difference between 56030 and 55050, assuming all the reductions in EV-DO are due to change from 56xxx to 55xxx, is Cellcom SIDs 362, 5652, and 5274, now have only 1X roaming, except in NID 7 where EV-DO remains.

 

- Trip

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Changed my mind and tried to do it now.  The key difference between 56030 and 55050, assuming all the reductions in EV-DO are due to change from 56xxx to 55xxx, is Cellcom SIDs 362, 5652, and 5274, now have only 1X roaming, except in NID 7 where EV-DO remains.

 

That corroborates a recent user report in this thread or another.  He was disappointed and puzzled why he received only CDMA1X roaming on Cellcom in northern Wisconsin.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes and I notice now northern WI isn't part of Roaming+ :(

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

The updated coverage map still shows Roaming+ under "3G and More"

 

?

 

Oh what!?  It looks like Appalachian Wireless is no longer on 3G roaming!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...