Jump to content

Comments related to the NV Running List Thread


Recommended Posts

Are the NV running list percentages going to be updated to reflect the 200 sites that were accepted last week? I guess since its so close to new week that the number of sites can be lumped into this upcoming week and be updated. Hoping to see more progress made in LA Metro and NYC since Sprint needs to get those markets closer to being launch ready as well as major progress in Chicago so that they can hurry up and move its crews to other Samsung markets which are in need of getting started.

 

It looks like the running list is being updated every 2 weeks. In the past it was just monthly I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It looks like the running list is being updated every 2 weeks. In the past it was just monthly I think.

 

Its being updated weekly now. I just have been really busy this week. Its on my to do list today.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check the last post in the running list thread. It hasn't been updated since 12/26. The numbers will change when Robert gets around to updating them. I assume he will once again post the updated message when he his done. Patience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New Orleans market hasn't changed at all and I know we have towers completed so why has nothing change on the list.
Check the last post in the running list thread. It hasn't been updated since 12/26. The numbers will change when Robert gets around to updating them. I assume he will once again post the updated message when he his done. Patience.

Sprint might not of accepted the sites yet.

 

Exactly

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should this be pinned to the top with the thread it relates to? Thought it got deleted or something until I found it at the bottom of the page.

 

I don't want it pinned. Lots of pinned things already. I think I have a link inside the actual running list. So that should be sufficient for those people reading the Running List, but want to comment on it.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure there will be.

 

By the way, I didn't get a chance to "run the numbers" until last night, so putting the Running List up from those numbers would be an exercise in outdated-ness, but

  • Of NV-complete sites, over half in Boston now have 4G. Some even have 1x SMR
  • Chicago is 77.5% NV complete. About 63% of that amount have 4G online.

There are more updates (Shentel got a big boost) but those were arguably the biggest ones last week.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Updates from Robert are not related to how fast Sprint is upgrading.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

I don't think you get what I meant. I meant to say that Sprint still needs to continue to make progress and hopefully every week they are getting at least 400-500 sites done a week nationwide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I don't think you get what I meant. I meant to say that Sprint still needs to continue to make progress and hopefully every week they are getting at least 400-500 sites done a week nationwide.

Gotcha :)

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry to bug you guys but do you think the running list will be updated sometime soon?

 

I am sure it will but Robert has been a busy man. When he has time to do so he will do it. In the mean time, I'll be looking for his updates to the NV complete sites list to see what new areas have 3G improvements and LTE lit up.

 

I would recommend that you become a sponsor so that you have access to the NV complete sites list so you can find out which sites in Los Angeles have been lit up with 3G improvements and LTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why they don't just accept 3G and 4G at once? I would rather have the engineers and inspectors take the extra hours to inspect the towers to be ready for 3G and 4G and be done with the tower. It just seems like they make unnecessary trips back to those sites.

 

I guess the main reason why most towers are accepted as 3G only in Alcatel markets may be due to backhaul issues which they can't accept 4G at the same time as 3G if backhaul is not ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why they don't just accept 3G and 4G at once? I would rather have the engineers and inspectors take the extra hours to inspect the towers to be ready for 3G and 4G and be done with the tower. It just seems like they make unnecessary trips back to those sites.

 

I guess the main reason why most towers are accepted as 3G only in Alcatel markets may be due to backhaul issues which they can't accept 4G at the same time as 3G if backhaul is not ready.

 

What you're really saying is you wish they would wait and not let the complete technology be usable until they all are ready at a site. Because that is what would happen if they tried to do what you want them to do. I don't want that at all.

 

Also, don't assume that just because one technology is accepted, doesn't mean they both were not installed at the same time. In most cases, the hardware for all technologies are installed at the same time. For instance, almost always at Samsung sites, CDMA 1900, CDMA 800 and LTE 1900 are all installed at once.

 

In your frustration, you are making faulty assumptions.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you're really saying is you wish they would wait and not let the complete technology be usable until they all are ready at a site. Because that is what would happen if they tried to do what you want them to do. I don't want that at all.

 

Also, don't assume that just because one technology is accepted, doesn't mean they both were not installed at the same time. In most cases, the hardware for all technologies are installed at the same time. For instance, almost always at Samsung sites, CDMA 1900, CDMA 800 and LTE 1900 are all installed at once.

 

In your frustration, you are making faulty assumptions.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

I wonder why 3G only on some sites though as opposed to 3G/800. Is it to the point that most non-4G upgrades include that now?

 

I know in their haste to get 3G running and get rid of the less than friendly Motorola sites in the beginning they might not have had time. However at this point I feel like they probably could afford to go ahead and do 800 with it. What do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I wonder why 3G only on some sites though as opposed to 3G/800. Is it to the point that most non-4G upgrades include that now?

 

I know in their haste to get 3G running and get rid of the less than friendly Motorola sites in the beginning they might not have had time. However at this point I feel like they probably could afford to go ahead and do 800 with it. What do you think?

 

Most sites are deployed with 800 now. About 3/4 of the new sites in Chicago now for instance go live with both 3G and 800 at the same time.

 

I know that in all Samsung markets, CDMA 800 is being deployed side by side with 3G and LTE. They just cannot be tested and accepted until the channels are cleared. Also, most Ericsson markets are deploying 800 on full build sites too now. I assume AlcaLu is too, but I do not have specific affirmation of that.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...