Jump to content

Dish Network proposes merger with Sprint Nextel for $25.5 billion


PythonFanPA

Recommended Posts

I regret selling my Clearwire and Sprint shares this past summer. I made good capital gains on them, having bought in the $1 and $2 ranges respectively, but keeping them would have given me triple-digit percentages gains. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this link is alittle outdated but is interesting if the FCC hasn't made its filling yet could be the reason dish wants to buy sprint so it don't have to worry about this anymore thus making their spectrum more valuable

 

 

http://www.fiercewir...ings/2012-11-19

 

on a side note correct me if i'm wrong but would sprint be able to use the spectrum in conjunction with what they currently have say on either the uplink or downlink say for 10x10 opperation or possibly 20x20 operation in the 1900-2020 spectrum that they would have if the deal with sprint goes threw again i'm a novice when it comes to spectrum talk. just to be clear i'm talking about possibly merging together the spectrum dish has aws-4 with the current spectrum sprint has on pcs g block and making them work together istead of fighting eachother if its not possible then the spectrum dish has would be unusable and softbank would be my first and only choice but if it is usable then dish dose have a fighting change in my book

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this link is alittle outdated but is interesting if the FCC hasn't made its filling yet could be the reason dish wants to buy sprint so it don't have to worry about this anymore thus making their spectrum more valuable

 

 

http://www.fiercewir...ings/2012-11-19

 

on a side note correct me if i'm wrong but would sprint be able to use the spectrum in conjunction with what they currently have say on either the uplink or downlink say for 10x10 opperation or possibly 20x20 operation in the 1900-2020 spectrum that they would have if the deal with sprint goes threw again i'm a novice when it comes to spectrum talk. just to be clear i'm talking about possibly merging together the spectrum dish has aws-4 with the current spectrum sprint has on pcs g block and making them work together istead of fighting eachother if its not possible then the spectrum dish has would be unusable and softbank would be my first and only choice but if it is usable then dish dose have a fighting change in my book

 

They can easily do a 10x10 operation if they bid and win the PCS H block. The only way they can make the Dish spectrum usable for a 20x20 operation is to apply to the FCC to reverse the uplink and downlink. That way the uplinks will be contiguous and the the downlinks can be aggregated together in a Carrier aggreagation scheme.

 

BTW, the possibility of Sprint and Dish getting together has been bandied around for a year now. I have long been an advocate of a cooperative arrangement between Dish and Sprint (a hosting of the Dish Spectrum), of Sprint selling them Dish the EBS spectrum and then hosting it for them or an outright merger (not a takeover). But Ergen is an egomaniac and wants to run things. The problem with his bid is that it will saddle the resulting entity with $45B of debt. And that $13B of synergies in his bid is a lot of hot air. That figure is pulled out of his arse.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can easily do a 10x10 operation if they bid and win the PCS H block. The only way they can make the Dish spectrum usable for a 20x20 operation is to apply to the FCC to reverse the uplink and downlink. That way the uplinks will be contiguous and the the downlinks can be aggregated together in a Carrier aggreagation scheme.

 

BTW, the possibility of Sprint and Dish getting together has been bandied around for a year now. I have long been an advocate of a cooperative arrangement between Dish and Sprint (a hosting of the Dish Spectrum), of Sprint selling them Dish the EBS spectrum and then hosting it for them or an outright merger (not a takeover). But Ergen is an egomaniac and wants to run things. The problem with his bid is that it will saddle the resulting entity with $45B of debt. And that $13B of synergies in his bid is a lot of hot air. That figure is pulled out of his arse.

 

sounds like another step that i wouldn't want to take especially with 45B in debt. in a perfect world i would like to see sprint get that spectrum, but with the 600 spectrum coming up for bid here soon, it looks like dish's offer would need ALOT of legal talk written into it to protect sprint from various things. all in all it is a bad deal. softbank is my choice and lets move on and try to get the national 600 spectrum that would really make sprints network pop off the map, just in time for the LTE advanced to come out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ergen reminds me of the little whiny kid that doesn't want to play with a certain toy until he sees another kid playing with it. He needs a timeout, on his knees, in the nearest corner.

 

Sent from my Cyano-Mod'd Nex7 using Tapatalk HD

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ergen reminds me of the little whiny kid that doesn't want to play with a certain toy until he sees another kid playing with it. He needs a timeout' date=' on his knees, in the nearest corner.

 

Sent from my Cyano-Mod'd Nex7 using Tapatalk HD[/quote']

 

You forget the uncooked rice on the floor in that corner

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can easily do a 10x10 operation if they bid and win the PCS H block. The only way they can make the Dish spectrum usable for a 20x20 operation is to apply to the FCC to reverse the uplink and downlink. That way the uplinks will be contiguous and the the downlinks can be aggregated together in a Carrier aggreagation scheme.

 

Dish's AWS-4 spectrum is 2000-2020 MHz x 2180-2200 MHz. So, even alone, Dish's bandwidth is sufficient for 20 MHz FDD LTE.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I swear, if Ergen gets his hands on Sprint, I'm buying the X Phone and taking my business elsewhere. I'm also bringing every Sprint customer I know with me.

 

Sent from my Cyano-Mod'd Nex7 using Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dish acknowledges receipt of NDA from Sprint:

 

http://finance.yahoo...-171000685.html

 

 

Side note: Just want to be clear as I started this thread and then sharing links like this, I'm not in support of Dish getting their hands on Sprint. I happen to be a Dish customer so I get emails with press releases of stuff like this as they happen and share them if they haven't been already, but I don't care for Ergen on a personal level anymore than anyone else.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I swear, if Ergen gets his hands on Sprint, I'm buying the X Phone and taking my business elsewhere. I'm also bringing every Sprint customer I know with me.

Now Now, lets not jump the gun... YET

 

:D

 

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even I would consider leaving Sprint if DISH were to acquire it. Not in the short term. However, all the quirks about Sprint would probably start to become very annoying to me under Ergen leadership. Sprint would be going from the lovable underdog carrier to the bully that everyone hates carrier.

 

If DISH were to become everything I fear them to be, my departure to Tmo would probably be inevitable. Besides. I'm more of a DirecTV guy. :hee:

 

Robert via Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoever buys Sprint, I'm willing to be reasonable. But I have terms:

 

1) Customer Service remains the same or gets better

2) Pricing remains competitive and sprint preserves its value proposition

3) For covered areas, the network is maintained

 

The days of Sprint being the cash strapped underdog will be over if Sprint becomes Dish owned. And to that extent, I will refuse to make any excuses or take crap from an over-leveraged company owned by a maniac. In my eyes, Sprint has a chance at finally being free of its financial handicap and champion wireless competition. Should it choose a few extra borrowed dollars over that, I have absolutely zero tolerance for much of any of the shortcomings realized when Captain Howdy can't find 37 billion in synergies.

 

Publicly , Ergen could be a real lunatic. He's a bridge burner. Basically "my way, or scorched earth". I could see him wreaking havoc on relationships with regional carriers as well as pissing all over Sprint's careful relationship with Verizon. Would be of absolutely no surprise to me to hear Ergen got pissed off because X phone manufacturer "refused to negotiate favorable device specs or pricing for Sprint" and likewise, X model phone won't be sold by Sprint. And the lovely thing about him is he likes to fight all his battles publicly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoever buys Sprint, I'm willing to be reasonable. But I have terms:

 

1) Customer Service remains the same or gets better

2) Pricing remains competitive and sprint preserves its value proposition

3) For covered areas, the network is maintained

 

The days of Sprint being the cash strapped underdog will be over if Sprint becomes Dish owned. And to that extent, I will refuse to make any excuses or take crap from an over-leveraged company owned by a maniac. In my eyes, Sprint has a chance at finally being free of its financial handicap and champion wireless competition. Should it choose a few extra borrowed dollars over that, I have absolutely zero tolerance for much of any of the shortcomings realized when Captain Howdy can't find 37 billion in synergies.

 

Publicly , Ergen could be a real lunatic. He's a bridge burner. Basically "my way, or scorched earth". I could see him wreaking havoc on relationships with regional carriers as well as pissing all over Sprint's careful relationship with Verizon. Would be of absolutely no surprise to me to hear Ergen got pissed off because X phone manufacturer "refused to negotiate favorable device specs or pricing for Sprint" and likewise, X model phone won't be sold by Sprint. And the lovely thing about him is he likes to fight all his battles publicly.

 

Aye...I don't need another ole lady lol

 

Sent from my Cyano-Mod'd Nex7 using Tapatalk HD

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Intel CEO to FCC: Softbank is the best buyer for Sprint

 

 

 

 

A strange endorsement as Sprint contemplates accepting a higher bid from Dish

 

In a letter to chairman of the FCC Julius Genachowski, CEO of Intel Paul Otellini has expressed that he believes Softbank is a better choice than Dish to buy Sprint. Following a trip to Asia where he met with Softbank, which an Intel spokesperson refers to as "a business partner", Otellini chose to write to the FCC to encourage the company's bid for Sprint regardless of the fact that Dish is offering a higher amount. Otellini's recommendation is one based on competition, he says:

"Son-san’s vision to build a high speed competitive third national network is very compelling. We need this competition in the wireless space as the ATT/Verizon model is not giving that to consumers at this time."

No further explanation is given as to why Softbank would provide a better competitive chance for Sprint than Dish, but CEO of Softbank Masayoshi Son has proven in the past to be a bit of a mover-and-shaker in the industries his company is a part of. That may not be enough for Sprint to consider its offer, however, as the bid from Dish is still over $5 billion higher. Sprint is expecting to vote on its current deal with Softbank on June 12th.

http://www.androidcentral.com/intel-ceo-fcc-softbank-best-buyer-sprint#comment-589755

Edited by ab30494
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • FTTH JVs are city by city as well, so it's not going to really be sector by sector. It sounds like TMo wants to be able to sell everyone home broadband, but if that requires building additional infrastructure that infra will take the form of FTTH builds rather than mobile densification. Which involves tradeoffs, but the product is better than e.g. what AT&T is doing for me right now, which is offering only Internet Air in an area where they have 100/20 DSL available but not (yet) fiber.
    • Hopefully they do not wait until these sectors get so overloaded that they start getting nasty reviews and people abandon them. Getting fiber coverage to the area of a overloaded sector can take a year or more. I also question if this can all be managed.  Lots of sectors all over the country can get congested fairly quick.  Lots of work and money to get fiber installed and there goes the profitability on the venture.
    • MoffetNathanson Conference This is a conference where the CFO talks telecom financial analysts so obviously it takes a return on investment approach.  Broadly T-Mobile divides there world into top 100 markets (60%) and small town/rural (40%). They ultimately want to have at least 1/3 market share in rural. They also look at demographics like 50+ and Hispanic.  Reputation is now starting to help them with CIOs.  Did mention c-band buildout beginning in major cities as well as continued band migration to 5g. IMO they may become more aggressive at offering 5g phones to LTE holdover and 5g users without VoNR at a future date. mmWave not discussed. Price increases not discussed iirc. Did mention spectrum purchases from speculators. $9 billion all goes through same ROI process. FWA is down to hexagonal patterns by sector of fallow spectrum. Fiber JVs will go where sectors are overloaded.
    • I am lucky to be served by an excellent fiber ISP and that is the only reason I haven't tried TMOs FWA. Once you go fiber, it is REALLY hard to go back. The choice of sub-10ms ping times is a very artificial bucket, FWA will seldom get much below 10ms ping times but fiber regularly gets me 1-3ms ping times. Basically, at around those times, the speed of light and the distance you are from the server become the limiting factors. As an aside, my internet provider, ZiplyFiber, has been awesome. They peer like crazy at all the major IX in the area and, as a result, you end up with what essentially amounts to direct fiber connections to the vast majority of major data sources. While it isn't sexy, it makes my 1Gb/1Gb connection load pages significantly faster than my works 10Gb/10Gb connection. On the "sexy" side, they are also fastest ISP in the nation. They offer up to 50Gb/50Gb via a direct fiber connection to the router, albeit for an eye watering $900/mo.
    • I took advantage of the special T-Mobile FWA special offer back in Dec, 2022 @ $25/month (still paying $25).  I was paying Spectrum $80/month for their basic 400/20 internet.  I'm full time WFM and routinely see greater than 400/80 with 15 mS latency.  I figure I've saved almost $1000 in 18 months and have arguably better service.  I realize they charge $60/month now but if it's available to you it's still a good deal.  Alta Fiber is installing fiber now so we'll have a third option by next year.  They charge $40/month for their 400/400 essential service.  Competition is finally happening.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...