Jump to content

SignalCheck - Android app to monitor your Wi-Fi/2G/3G/4G LTE/5G-NR signal strengths


mikejeep

Recommended Posts

In Crystal City and Pentagon City Metro stations, the 02 and 1A sectors of 0303DFxx are used with PCI 403.  In Pentagon Metro, the 01 and 19 sectors of 0303DFxx are used with PCI 234.  So in my database, I set the notes for each of the sectors differently to match where they actually belong.  That is, 0303DF02 and 0303DF1A say "Crystal City/Pentagon City (U)" while 0303DF01 and 0303DF19 say "Pentagon Metro (U)".  Despite this, the note for the 01/19 sector is showing even though I'm connected to 1A in the picture.  (But then the correct note is used for the neighbor cell!)

 

I know that the sectors are linked so that the app is smart enough to link newly-seen sectors together (as well as connecting B41 with B25/B26) and when you set a site note from within the app it rewrites all the associated ones, which is all fine and preferred, but I didn't think it did that when reading back out of the database as well. 

 

Thoughts?

 

- Trip

 

Sounds like you might not be setting strongest_rsrp, strongest_latitutde, and strongest_longitude in your database?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) There doesn't tend to be usable GPS in subway stations (underground).

 

2) The neighbor notes were correct.  It was the site I was connected to (which had the GCI available for matching) that was incorrect.

 

- Trip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) There doesn't tend to be usable GPS in subway stations (underground).

 

2) The neighbor notes were correct.  It was the site I was connected to (which had the GCI available for matching) that was incorrect.

 

- Trip

 

I believe the SCP uses just the first 6 characters of the GCI when saving site notes? It then assigns that note to any other GCIs with the same first 6 characters. That's probably what you are running in to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay...so this has probably been answered before, but...

 

When you Export Site Logs, Where is the file saved?

 

In the SignalCheck directory on the phone itself (not the SD card).  So if you plug in your phone and have MTP enabled, on your computer (assuming Windows), your phone should appear, open that, then the phone's storage, then SignalCheck.

 

- Trip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the SignalCheck directory on the phone itself (not the SD card). So if you plug in your phone and have MTP enabled, on your computer (assuming Windows), your phone should appear, open that, then the phone's storage, then SignalCheck.

 

- Trip

Thanks Trip!

 

I found the folder using ES File Explorer, and I am uploading copies of the files to my Google Drive.

 

I'll email them to you this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Trip!

 

I found the folder using ES File Explorer, and I am uploading copies of the files to my Google Drive.

 

I'll email them to you this week.

 

Excellent, thanks! :)

 

- Trip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edit: (Mods if this should be in another Thread Please move it where appropriate)

 

So I'm road tripping this holiday weekend from Seattle To Salt Lake City.

 

I'm hoping they filled in some of the gaps along I-84 in Idaho and Northern Utah but not holding my breath.

 

I figured I'd enable logging in SignalCheck Pro while driving but wasn't positive if I should enable the option for "Log Sites with Missing GCI?

 

Is that really beneficial at all? or is it something that would just make the log file more bloated without any useful info?

 

-J

Edited by sleet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Mike...

 

In displaying "W-DAS," what/how is SignalCheck Pro detecting DAS?  I see this occasionally, often just fleetingly on AT&T band 17 and band 4.  I do not think that I have caught it on AT&T band 2.

 

a2xfdu.png

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike...

 

In displaying "W-DAS," what/how is SignalCheck Pro detecting DAS?  I see this occasionally, often just fleetingly on AT&T band 17 and band 4.  I do not think that I have caught it on AT&T band 2.

 

a2xfdu.png

 

AJ

 

I'm pretty sure Mike is detecting based on the last two digits of the GCI.  AT&T is very consistent in that way.

 

I've seen B2 DAS before, but mostly B17.

 

- Trip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure Mike is detecting based on the last two digits of the GCI. AT&T is very consistent in that way.

 

I've seen B2 DAS before, but mostly B17.

 

^ This; it's all GCI-based. AT&T is very clean with its GCI patterns. I have a very reliable source who provides me with nearly all of my AT&T info. If anyone on AT&T sees a GCI but doesn't see a band indicator, grab a screenshot and let me know; I believe the app has that network 100% covered at the moment.

 

-Mike

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ This; it's all GCI-based. AT&T is very clean with its GCI patterns. I have a very reliable source who provides me with nearly all of my AT&T info. If anyone on AT&T sees a GCI but doesn't see a band indicator, grab a screenshot and let me know; I believe the app has that network 100% covered at the moment.

 

-Mike

Psst..

 

 

Nokia / Alcatel-Lucent 3rd B41 carrier appears to end in Gci 41,42,43.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ This; it's all GCI-based. AT&T is very clean with its GCI patterns. I have a very reliable source who provides me with nearly all of my AT&T info. If anyone on AT&T sees a GCI but doesn't see a band indicator, grab a screenshot and let me know; I believe the app has that network 100% covered at the moment.

 

-Mike

 

What ironic timing!  Yesterday, while I was out and about, I think I spotted the first four-sector AT&T site I've ever seen.  It fit the pattern except the fourth sector was a logical continuation of the existing pattern--and was not identified accordingly.  So LTE 1900 was 08/09/0A/0B, LTE 700 was 0F/10/11/12, and LTE AWS was 16/17/18/19, but the 0B, 12, and 19 sectors were not IDed.  I have screenshots on my AT&T phone and will send them later.

 

- Trip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ This; it's all GCI-based. AT&T is very clean with its GCI patterns. I have a very reliable source who provides me with nearly all of my AT&T info. If anyone on AT&T sees a GCI but doesn't see a band indicator, grab a screenshot and let me know; I believe the app has that network 100% covered at the moment.

 

-Mike

 

You've got mail.

 

- Trip

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What ironic timing!  Yesterday, while I was out and about, I think I spotted the first four-sector AT&T site I've ever seen.  It fit the pattern except the fourth sector was a logical continuation of the existing pattern--and was not identified accordingly.  So LTE 1900 was 08/09/0A/0B, LTE 700 was 0F/10/11/12, and LTE AWS was 16/17/18/19, but the 0B, 12, and 19 sectors were not IDed.  I have screenshots on my AT&T phone and will send them later.

 

- Trip

 

Take a look at eNodeB 180321 / 184321 for another one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that seems odd is your upload and download channels are different. They should be the same for B41. Not sure what your phone was doing just then.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that seems odd is your upload and download channels are different. They should be the same for B41. Not sure what your phone was doing just then.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 

Some devices show an invalid number on the upload channel since TDD-LTE uses the same channel for both. Tends to be Samsung devices that do that if I'm remembering right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering adding this phone to my collection:

 

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01F9N5QXI

 

Particularly for catching AT&T HSPA (unactivated SIM) and possibly T-Mobile AWS/PCS LTE since my LG Leon tends to camp on 700.  What does SCP do on a device with dual SIM support?  Can it see both at once or is it just one at a time?

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering adding this phone to my collection:

 

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01F9N5QXI

 

Particularly for catching AT&T HSPA (unactivated SIM) and possibly T-Mobile AWS/PCS LTE since my LG Leon tends to camp on 700.  What does SCP do on a device with dual SIM support?  Can it see both at once or is it just one at a time?

 

Unless my understanding of how a dual SIM device operates is incorrect, it just has two physical SIM slots -- but only one is active at any given time.  In no way is the device attached to two networks at the same time.  That would require multiple baseband modems, which I do not believe a dual SIM device possesses.  Essentially, the inactive slot acts as a carrying case for that SIM and obviates the need to remove and swap between two SIMs.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless my understanding of how a dual SIM device operates is incorrect, it just has two physical SIM slots -- but only one is active at any given time.  In no way is the device attached to two networks at the same time.  That would require multiple baseband modems, which I do not believe a dual SIM device possesses.  Essentially, the inactive slot acts as a carrying case for that SIM and obviates the need to remove and swap between two SIMs.

 

AJ

 

That's disappointing, if true.  I'm wondering why it wouldn't be something resembling SRLTE, where it's authenticated and listening to both at once while only actively connected to one.  That doesn't require two modems, right?

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's disappointing, if true. I'm wondering why it wouldn't be something resembling SRLTE, where it's authenticated and listening to both at once while only actively connected to one. That doesn't require two modems, right?

 

- Trip

That's the way the old dual SIM phones worked (around 2011). My friend had one and it would show his signal on both networks. He set one as the default for data and texts and calls, but incoming texts and calls on the other would still work, and it would default to using that one if the other one lost service.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...