Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - San Diego Market


ferhusky

Recommended Posts

Last Sunday I decided to take a ride to Lake Elsinore. I was amazed at how much B41 is live after crossing the border check, going into Temecula all the way to Lake Elsinore. The strongest signals seemed to be in between both places.

 

I've mentioned poor to no service in Carlsbad along certain areas of the coast, or the past 2 months. Here's what I've experienced this morning.

 

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ofspmfoxhe9lg8g/AADqFmcng3a2nkuab2zrRjJ7a?dl=0

 

I was also in Vista last Saturday at a friend's house I go to frequently. As mentioned in past comments, service has always been spotty from decent 3G, so so LTE, and it's to the point now where it just plain suck since early July. I called Sprint many times, and used Sprint Zone. Well I ended up calling to report this issue forthe 4th time. There are 2 towers the house sits between. One 3G, and the other LTE. After being on the phone with a Sprint rep for nearly an hour, I've explained what's been happening. He looks in the system, and sees the calls I've made reporting this location a couple of times. First thing asked was if I updated profile, etc..... I explained that didn't have anything to do with it. He looks again, and then tells me I'm connected to a tower 3 miles or so away just by looking at the system. Looking at Sponsor maps here, I know I'm sitting in between 2 towers they don't see, which are both no further than a mile and half apart. One I can actually see from back yard, that's less than a mile. After an hour of getting nowhere, a ticket was submitted, and was told there were some upgrading a couple days before, but I explained this has been going on for a very long time. I took screenshots. What I did discover leaving late that evening was a B41 signal appearing over at the other tower on way home. Here's what I get everytime I go visit.

 

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/fve6c7c7s4h4t0x/AABjLksaT_VTNJEe1d-iup23a?dl=0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

A little band 41 love in Pacific Beach.  Last night on Garnet, inside, near Cass St.

 

 

 

 

 

Is this a new B41 site?  Did you pick up CA from this site?  Most newly deployed B41 sites are being activated with 2nd carrier and CA ready rock!

 

Much needed B41 in that area which serves part of the beach.  This site is located on Cass St/Emerald St.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's new to me and I check fairly often.  I didn't check for CA but the speed was around 30 so most likely not.  BTW - Yes, I know the building across the intersection from the post office, diagonally.  

 

Is this a new B41 site?  Did you pick up CA from this site?  Most newly deployed B41 sites are being activated with 2nd carrier and CA ready rock!

 

Much needed B41 in that area which serves part of the beach.  This site is located on Cass St/Emerald St.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Confirming San Ysidro is now Spark live! I went back down to a very crowded outlet, and busy border this afternoon. Took 2 speed tests when I first noticed when I parked, and the second was way faster leaving, sitting at a traffic light near the border crossing heading back northbound. Big difference in service compared to the last time I was there.

 

Screenshot_2015_09_07_13_10_02.jpg

 

Screenshot_2015_09_07_13_10_30.jpg

 

Screenshot_2015_09_07_21_57_38.jpg

 

Screenshot_2015_09_07_21_57_44.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Confirming San Ysidro is now Spark live! I went back down to a very crowded outlet, and busy border this afternoon. Took 2 speed tests when I first noticed when I parked, and the second was way faster leaving, sitting at a traffic light near the border crossing heading back northbound. Big difference in service compared to the last time I was there.

 

 

 

You probably get better speeds using a speedtest servers in San Diego.  TJ speedtest servers are very slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a site in Mission Valley getting crazy capacity.  It is on a rooftop.  Check out this setup which consist of 2x2.5 and 4x1.9. First site I have seen in San Diego with this type of setup.

 

http://imgur.com/a/kyQbc#xWmJ2vN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a site in Mission Valley getting crazy capacity.  It is on a rooftop.  Check out this setup which consist of 2x2.5 and 4x1.9. First site I have seen in San Diego with this type of setup.

 

http://imgur.com/a/kyQbc#xWmJ2vN

 

This is two separate sectors. So 2 NV + 1 8T8R. A typical high capacity setup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at all the red tapes just to add 2.5 antennas.  The project was submitted in 11/14/2014 and is still going.

 

Looks like folks in Mira Mesa will get more 2.5 love soon.

 

http://www.sandiego.gov/development-services/pdf/hearingofficer/reports/2015/HO-15-109.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else experiencing no LTE/B41 countywide that has it, and being stuck on so so 3G or 1x for past week and half? North County seems to be that way again, Especially Oceanside and Vista. Even at home for me, LTE has been useless, and 3G isn't all that great either. I've reported on Sprint Zone, and called, but nobody doesn't know anything speaking with reps, and they all swear up and down it's my phone being the issue, so in return one gave me a $10 off my next bill for not really resolving the issue. Same for work in Encinitas, when I have pretty good LTE ranging from -93 to -95dBm, but been getting 1x off and on throughout the day off and on lately.

 

Screenshot_2015_09_15_11_11_35.jpg

 

Screenshot_2015_09_15_11_12_05.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have mostly been on 3G and 1X in San Diego ever since carrier 20.1 came out for the iPhone. It is hard for me to know what is network related and what is phone software related since that update. It has been a sub-par experience either way but things still work on 3G. On 1X I usually get a no network connection error. With iOS 9 coming I am hoping there is an improvement with an updated carrier bundle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have mostly been on 3G and 1X in San Diego ever since carrier 20.1 came out for the iPhone. It is hard for me to know what is network related and what is phone software related since that update. It has been a sub-par experience either way but things still work on 3G. On 1X I usually get a no network connection error. With iOS 9 coming I am hoping there is an improvement with an updated carrier bundle.

I have been seeing more and more b41 but this is on my S6. I am on LTE 90% of the time throughout San Diego.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have mostly been on 3G and 1X in San Diego ever since carrier 20.1 came out for the iPhone. It is hard for me to know what is network related and what is phone software related since that update. It has been a sub-par experience either way but things still work on 3G. On 1X I usually get a no network connection error. With iOS 9 coming I am hoping there is an improvement with an updated carrier bundle.

you and me both, i should be upgrading ios sometime today ( : hope it improves things in my home town 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New B41 site in Vista that's now live. Was in testing a month ago, when I happen to see it popup, and disappear at the time. The site is over in one of those white agriculture structures where the GPS is pointing. Sponsor map also shows same site location.

 

Screenshot_2015_09_19_08_53_36.jpg

 

Screenshot_2015_09_19_08_54_30.jpg

 

Screenshot_2015_09_19_21_30_23.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had lunch in Sorrento Valley and B41 was really slow today; only got 4-5 megabits on speedtest and everything else seemed to be lagging pretty hard. Maybe it's time for Sprint to turn on another carrier if one's not there already? (My phone doesn't support CA on B41 so no way to test.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had lunch in Sorrento Valley and B41 was really slow today; only got 4-5 megabits on speedtest and everything else seemed to be lagging pretty hard. Maybe it's time for Sprint to turn on another carrier if one's not there already? (My phone doesn't support CA on B41 so no way to test.)

 

That is pretty good during peak time in that area.  It is similar to downtown SD, I get around 5-10 on B41 with second carrier.  With CA I can get around 20Mbps.  4-5Mbps is way better than no data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I called up Sprint the day before about the North County issues. According to a rep, there has been many outages in North county in the past couple of weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I called up Sprint the day before about the North County issues. According to a rep, there has been many outages in North county in the past couple of weeks.

Yup i was roaming on Verizon at Lowes in Vista last Friday night.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday while in Carlsbad, I was heading to Vista taking the back way on Poinsettia/Melrose. I then noticed being stuck on eHRPD only for a couple of miles, until I got near the 78 in Vista.

Screenshot_2015_09_22_16_31_30.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was on interstate 5/805 split towards 52, found multiple 2nd carrier B25?  Can someone confirm if the GCI is in fact 2nd carriers?  If it is, this would be the first 2nd carrier B25 spotted in San Diego.

 

bWs6t4om.png3ImcaITm.png

Rmy4P9tm.pngZiWt2pAm.png

7JXNk7Jm.pngvODQc5lm.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...