Jump to content

Recommended Posts

 

LA did start in the beginning. But the LA market has over 1,000 sites. Sprint is not doing a thin LTE overlay over the whole city, but they are dismantling and replacing every piece of hardware in their entire network and creating multi modal base stations. An entirely new network from top to bottom, and adding LTE along the way. They are replacing all the equipment at every site and upgrading to new fiber and fiber backed backhaul.

 

Sprint is adding LTE to every one of their sites in the country. In LA, it means it is going to take awhile to complete totally. But LTE service will grow and grow every week. And 3G also improves one tower at a time too.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

 

Well Verizon has the same EVDO Technology as sprint

Why is there LTE up and running for years and you can talk and serf the net too!! Sure there expensive as all hell but

That's what I'm talking about u cant make excuses sprint WiMAX failed totally now boost has it they could jump on LTE

Very early

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Verizon has the same EVDO Technology as sprint

Why is there LTE up and running for years and you can talk and serf the net too!! Sure there expensive as all hell but

That's what I'm talking about u cant make excuses sprint WiMAX failed totally now boost has it they could jump on LTE

Very early

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Let's get one thing clear...I am not making excuses. I am explaining something to you, that you do not understand. And also, we are not Sprint.

 

Verizon did not rebuild their network from the ground up. Verizon does not have multi-modal base stations. Verizon installed just a 700MHz overlay of LTE. They did not even install it on every site. They are banking on the better distances of 700MHz to cheaply and thinly deploy LTE. And their speeds are plummeting as a result. In my area Verizon LTE speeds are 30% - 40% what they were when they first deployed. Sprint is deploying their network much denser and on every site. It will take more time to deploy Sprint's LTE than it did Verizon to do theirs. It is just the way it is. Sprint is deploying theirs on 3-4 times more sites and all at once.

 

Verizon also started their deployment two years ago. Sprint just recently switched to LTE technology, so no doubt they have a huge head start. You also have no idea how long it took for Verizon to do the install around LA because they turned it on all at once. In contrast, Sprint is allowing their customers to connect immediately to all the sites as they complete.

 

If Sprint doesn't meet your needs, then go to Verizon. We won't stop you or beg you. However, Sprint is actively deploying LTE in LA County, and the coverage grows every week. And the service works great in the areas it has been deployed. And now with SoftBank investment in Sprint, the future is even brighter. It will not be too long in the future when being on Verizon's LTE network will not be much of an advantage at all.

 

Robert

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

none the less we both are due for upgrades

 

True to that, I have no issue waiting though. I'm waiting to see if samsung will release phones with their new flexible LCDs on an S4... plus future proof LTE 800 i hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Let's get one thing clear...I am not making excuses. I am explaining something to you, that you do not understand. And also, we are not Sprint.

 

Verizon did not rebuild their network from the ground up. Verizon does not have multi-modal base stations. Verizon installed just a 700MHz overlay of LTE. They did not even install it on every site. They are banking on the better distances of 700MHz to cheaply and thinly deploy LTE. And their speeds are plummeting as a result. In my area Verizon LTE speeds are 30% - 40% what they were when they first deployed. Sprint is deploying their network much denser and on every site. It will take more time to deploy Sprint's LTE than it did Verizon to do theirs. It is just the way it is. Sprint is deploying theirs on 3-4 times more sites and all at once.

 

Verizon also started their deployment two years ago. Sprint just recently switched to LTE technology, so no doubt they have a huge head start. You also have no idea how long it took for Verizon to do the install around LA because they turned it on all at once. In contrast, Sprint is allowing their customers to connect immediately to all the sites as they complete.

 

If Sprint doesn't meet your needs, then go to Verizon. We won't stop you or beg you. However, Sprint is actively deploying LTE in LA County, and the coverage grows every week. And the service works great in the areas it has been deployed. And now with SoftBank investment in Sprint, the future is even brighter. It will not be too long in the future when being on Verizon's LTE network will not be much of an advantage at all.

 

Robert

 

I am a sprint costumer for 10 years I do have knowledge

On technology and networks I like sprint because of there affordability but the moves they have been making for the past 6 years have been horrible they had the change to get fios BEFORE Verizon and they declined (you probably didn't know that ) they where also presented with LTE first 4 years ago and they also declined that banking on WiMAX I'm patient with sprint but my patience is growing weary they just have to step there game up

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a sprint costumer for 10 years I do have knowledge

On technology and networks I like sprint because of there affordability but the moves they have been making for the past 6 years have been horrible they had the change to get fios BEFORE Verizon and they declined (you probably didn't know that ) they where also presented with LTE first 4 years ago and they also declined that banking on WiMAX I'm patient with sprint but my patience is growing weary they just have to step there game up

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

They have stepped up their game. THEY ARE ACTIVELY DEPLOYING LTE IN YOUR AREA. They had to deploy fast mobile broadband starting in 2008 because of the build out requirements on EBS/BRS spectrum. They had no choice but to use WiMax back then. LTE was not ready to start being deployed until the 2nd Half of 2010, just before build out requirements were about to expire. WiMax was the only technology on the market at the time they could use. Also, WiMax was specifically designed for high frequency spectrum like EBS/BRS.

 

Please do not complain any further. Your posts are just complaints. We do not host Sprint complaints. If you do not want to discuss Network Vision/LTE deployment, and just want to complain about it, you may want to go to another forum besides S4GRU.

 

Robert

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

They have stepped up their game. THEY ARE ACTIVELY DEPLOYING LTE IN YOUR AREA. They had to deploy fast mobile broadband starting in 2008 because of the build out requirements on EBS/BRS spectrum. They had no choice but to use WiMax back then. LTE was not ready to start being deployed until the 2nd Half of 2010, just before build out requirements were about to expire. WiMax was the only technology on the market at the time they could use. Also, WiMax was specifically designed for high frequency spectrum like EBS/BRS.

 

Please do not complain any further. Your posts are just complaints. We do not host Sprint complaints. If you do not want to discuss Network Vision/LTE deployment, and just want to complain about it, you may want to go to another forum besides S4GRU.

 

Robert

where is the thumbs up button lol.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

They have stepped up their game. THEY ARE ACTIVELY DEPLOYING LTE IN YOUR AREA. They had to deploy fast mobile broadband starting in 2008 because of the build out requirements on EBS/BRS spectrum. They had no choice but to use WiMax back then. LTE was not ready to start being deployed until the 2nd Half of 2010, just before build out requirements were about to expire. WiMax was the only technology on the market at the time they could use. Also, WiMax was specifically designed for high frequency spectrum like EBS/BRS.

 

Please do not complain any further. Your posts are just complaints. We do not host Sprint complaints. If you do not want to discuss Network Vision/LTE deployment, and just want to complain about it, you may want to go to another forum besides S4GRU.

 

Robert

 

I'm not complaining just stating facts

But to each there own I will continue being a sprint customer because in my eyes they are better in customer service

Then Verizon and AT&T I just want sprint to be 1 as a cell provider because they are very capable of doing so and not #3

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm not complaining just stating facts

But to each there own I will continue being a sprint customer because in my eyes they are better in customer service

Then Verizon and AT&T I just want sprint to be 1 as a cell provider because they are very capable of doing so and not #3

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Based on this post, I believe that you will be a happy Sprint customer in approximately a year or so. And it will incrementally get better every week until that point. It is not an easy process but it is a process underway.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what this might mean, but lately I've been seeing hints of LTE in and especially outside my house, which seems to have started maybe 4 days ago. Previously I had to walk about 3 blocks North. Today I noticed my connection go from 4G to 3G, and when I look now, it is EvDo-revA:8, whereas before, my 3G was always eHRPD.

 

Also, I was wondering, is it possible that the changing network could cause decresed battery life, with all the changing and shifting and searching? I have noticed decresed battery life starting a week ago. However, this also coincided with a software update for my Photon Q.

 

Sent from my XT897 using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone mapped out the LTE signal at LAX today. Well done whoever it was. By the way, I would have said it was a thorough job, except you missed mapping out the southern side of Center Way.

 

P.S.~ I crack up every time I see the mapped signal on the western edges of the south runways. I envision someone driving a luggage transport vehicle and doing some crazy maneouvers on the airstrip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't received a LTE signal for about a week in the South Bay. I wonder if Sprint has finished testing or are they waiting on new installations to come online.

 

I have noticed slower lte speeds, even inconsistent speeds, from the mapped areas in Lomita and San Pedro the past few days. But the signal is still there.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTE has been inconsistent in the Downtown Civic Center area this week. My phone shows is has acquired the late signal but uploads and downloads sometimes are painfully slow. Slower than 3g at times.

 

[quote name=rayluis1988'

timestamp='1353010422' post='69363]LTE is being OFF like for 3 days here in Glendale.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...