Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market


Ace41690

Recommended Posts

I wish Toledo,OH was NYC :(

 

Evo

 

I wouldn't have too much envy, as much of NYC is in the same boat. Sme areas have abysmal 3G speeds ( even though others are great in the city), and we don't have imminent LTE. All we have are rumors of a October or November possible prelaunch, with no confirmation from Sprint. I'm so desperate that I scout for towers and towers being worked on a daily basis.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I wouldn't have too much envy' date=' as much of NYC is in the same boat. Sme areas have abysmal 3G speeds ( even though others are great in the city), and we don't have imminent LTE. All we have are rumors of a October or November possible prelaunch, with no confirmation from Sprint. I'm so desperate that I scout for towers and towers being worked on a daily basis.[/quote']

 

If you were a sponsor you would see the completed sites map that is updated weekly so you could monitor the progress. Also Sprint has officially put NYC on its next 100 cities list which shows all the markets that ate supposed to launch before the end of the year.

 

Much more than rumors around here.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being in the columbus circle area, I have noticed an improvement in the 3G speeds. I had speeds of about 1.59megs. What is sad, is that it was faster than my school WiFi.

 

Any word on LTE in New York? I cant wait until the day it just pops up on my phone. Im going to poop with happinesspost-5512-0-26944400-1348667237_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

If you were a sponsor you would see the completed sites map that is updated weekly so you could monitor the progress. Also Sprint has officially put NYC on its next 100 cities list which shows all the markets that ate supposed to launch before the end of the year.

 

Much more than rumors around here.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Ok Robert. I'll look into that. This site has been an invaluable resource. Without it, we'd all be in the dark since Sprint has been holding their cards pretty close to the chest. Like most of us, I'm impatient and as a New Yorker, I feel that Sprint should prioritize one of their largest markets, even though I know better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok Robert. I'll look into that. This site has been an invaluable resource. Without it' date=' we'd all be in the dark since Sprint has been holding their cards pretty close to the chest. Like most of us, I'm impatient and as a New Yorker, I feel that Sprint should prioritize one of their largest markets, even though I know better.[/quote']

 

I agree that New York should be a priority. And in many ways it is. It is a Round One market. It started very early in Network Vision. But the market is so large with the most amount of towers. And it is extremely dense. Most sites in NYC cover such a small area. That when even a few hundred sites are complete, that the coverage from them is kind of underwhelming and the customers don't notice much. Its still going strong. But I think it will be the end of the year before New Yorkers really start feeling the improvements on a larger scale.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need to pick up the pace like they did in Chicago.

 

Chicago had close to 100 sites completed every week for months leading up to the launch of the market.

 

I think year end is being very optimistic. At this pace (10 non LTE sites a week) I don't see LTE being lauched before the spring 2013 here in NY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need to pick up the pace like they did in Chicago.

 

Chicago had close to 100 sites completed every week for months leading up to the launch of the market.

 

I think year end is being very optimistic. At this pace (10 non LTE sites a week) I don't see LTE being lauched before the spring 2013 here in NY

 

Chicago has yet to launch. The only thing that has occurred there is that they are no longer blocking access to every completed site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chicago has yet to launch. The only thing that has occurred there is that they are no longer blocking access to every completed site.

 

Yeah your right, I had to go back and read the article on engadget.

 

I wonder why they did it this way.

 

Coverage too sparse to call it a launch but wanted customers to see work is being done to alleviate the poor state of their network maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah your right, I had to go back and read the article on engadget.

 

I wonder why they did it this way.

 

Coverage too sparse to call it a launch but wanted customers to see work is being done to alleviate the poor state of their network maybe?

 

They have a ton of sites that have been upgraded, but none in the city. If Sprint officially launched the "Chicago" market, the actual city of Chicago would have no LTE and everyone would scream that Sprint is awful.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know the actual number of completed lte sites in NYC, but I'm hopeful that Sprint will have some live lte sites in NYC by November. Even if the coverage is spotty.

 

According to the sponsor maps there are less than 10 LTE sites in the NYC market as of last sunday, only 1 of those are in the 5 boros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

According to the sponsor maps there are less than 10 LTE sites in the NYC market as of last sunday' date=' only 1 of those are in the 5 boros.[/quote']

 

Number 1...you cannot discuss in public forums information in Sponsor sections.

 

Number 2...the 10 LTE sites are the only ones accepted as complete from Sprint from the OEMs. But there are over 100 sites complete in the market including the boroughs with 3G improvements accepted. Those sites where 3G is complete also have all the 4G hardware installed too. Its just that the 4G LTE is not ready yet at these locations.

 

We have seen 100's of sites in Boston, Chicago and Baltimore convert from 3G only to 3G/4G on our NV Sites complete map. In fact, in Chicago, over 20 sites did that last week alone. And it will soon happen in NYC too.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Number 1...you cannot discuss in public forums information in Sponsor sections.

 

Number 2...the 10 LTE sites are the only ones accepted as complete from Sprint from the OEMs. But there are over 100 sites complete in the market including the boroughs with 3G improvements accepted. Those sites where 3G is complete also have all the 4G hardware installed too. Its just that the 4G LTE is not ready yet at these locations.

 

We have seen 100's of sites in Boston, Chicago and Baltimore convert from 3G only to 3G/4G on our NV Sites complete map. In fact, in Chicago, over 20 sites did that last week alone. And it will soon happen in NYC too.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

Didn't know discussing info in the sponsor sections were taboo.

 

I almost posted a screen shot of the map, good thing I didn't huh!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wanted to say that I finished a full week in Manhattan (Chinatown mainly) and I regret a bit not switching back to my WiMAX phone. I was switching between a T-Mobile USB stick and Sprint 3G as my primary internet connection for surfing and some Skype.

 

I was pretty impressed with 3G. I don't recall the exact speeds in the past (since I had always been on WiMAX), but this week, I was able to pull 1-1.7Mbps around the clock. During peak hours, I've seen it drop to around 600-700Kbps, but pick back up within a few minutes. I hope I'm not just talking crazy, but it seems like backhaul may have increased on these towers (NV). Even during peak hours the speeds generally stayed over 50% of maximum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am constantly getting eHRPD in my neighborhood now' date=' could that mean that they are blocking LTE connections.[/quote']

 

They could be. But it is not necessarily indicative of that.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

They could be. But it is not necessarily indicative of that.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

Thanks. I am actually get eHRPD all over Flatlands, Flatbush, and Canarsie now. It is insane. As far as I can tell, up to a few weeks ago, most of these towers have been Evdo only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One more question and then I am done, I swear! When these towers are being upgraded does network performance go down? On all of these eHRPD towers I used to get pings in the low one hundreds and even lower. Now I am getting pings in the 400's and 500's and speeds more similar to 1x than Evdo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...