Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Missouri Market (includes St. Louis)


riddlebox

Recommended Posts

Has anyone in the STL area started to compile a list of the SID's you connect to? it's the best way to know how many towers are in the area and which tower you are actually connected to.

 

SIDs? Maybe SCIDs. Very confusing when people call them SIDs.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just plotted a couple hundred points in sensorly in STL. I mostly only picked up LTE where it had already been plotted in sensorly, but I did get a little bit where it was not on the map while mapping the trip in sensorly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As stated in another forum looks like a bunch of new LTE showing up north of 40/I-64 in St Louis including that Delwood site, Hillsdale, and St Ann. Its mostly along I-70.

 

 

FILL IN THE PURPLE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have action in mid Missouri now, tower in Barnett,mo is installed

 

Sent from my EVO using Forum Runner

 

Wow! Can't get much more MID Missouri than that!

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone in the STL area started to compile a list of the SID's you connect to? it's the best way to know how many towers are in the area and which tower you are actually connected to.

 

I can add this information to the spreadsheet I have if someone goes out to the sites that are currently live and can take screenshots or jot down the LTE Engineering info. So far we have three sites that are up as far as we know. 270 and Lindbergh, Dellwood Rec, and Goodfellow and St. Louis Ave. If someone can get the Serving Cell ID's I can input the info into the spreadsheet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully this helps a little.

 

ForumRunner_20130414_232814.png

 

 

 

[ATTACH]3068[/ATTACH]

Please see this thread. It will show you how to get the serving cell ID's there should be 3 per site as far as I know.

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/2198-network-visionlte-new-orleans-market/page__st__740__p__90231&do=findComment&comment=90231

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I zipped past this site on 270 on my way to work this morning. I always wondered why that gigantic flagpole was there...

 

Anyway, the access panel is still off, and I could see the antenna inside. I was driving too fast to see any details, though. No trucks or other ground activity that I could see.

 

There were two guys in a bucket truck working on the "flag pole" near 270 & McDonnell this morning. Is this even a Sprint tower? Seems awfully close to the tower at 270 & Lindburgh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

There were two guys in a bucket truck working on the "flag pole" near 270 & McDonnell this morning. Is this even a Sprint tower? Seems awfully close to the tower at 270 & Lindburgh.

 

Yup it is Sprint's and you loose the signal from the one at 270 and Lindbergh just west of the big flagpole. Perfect spacing in my book.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The white trucks near 70 and Zumbhel at the Sprint site on the we buy ugly houses billboard are not NV related. The are working on ATT refurbishing according to the guy there today. "Fixing stuff that's needed it for a while."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wanted to report that I had LTE for about 30 seconds while driving on 70 right in front of the airport so hopefully this explains my horrid speeds as of late. Sorry if this has already been posted already but had to share.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

post-4680-1366062627628_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Ditto for me on 70 in front of Lambert

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

Not sure why you are posting those. That's only the 1x basestations where LTE was found. It will hugely mismatched until all sites are completed.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Not sure why you are posting those. That's only the 1x basestations where LTE was found. It will hugely mismatched until all sites are completed.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

I was not aware of that. I thought it was the bsids for the lte towers. Thanks for clarifying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I was not aware of that. I thought it was the bsids for the lte towers. Thanks for clarifying.

 

LTE engineering screen shots of -80 or better is what we require for site confirmation on the new Orleans spreadsheet. Veteran hunters have the rules relaxed. Iphone5 and HTC devices are exempt as they show the unique ID cell identities and I already figured out all the hex IDs for the entire market.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, good to know but don't have to be a d**k about it

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

You see thats the thing about the internet....i wasn't trying to come off as a dick...just trying to inform...I guess the first post on this page got overlooked....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTE engineering screen shots of -80 or better is what we require for site confirmation on the new Orleans spreadsheet. Veteran hunters have the rules relaxed. Iphone5 and HTC devices are exempt as they show the unique ID cell identities and I already figured out all the hex IDs for the entire market.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

Doesn't Robert have access to "Acceptance Reports" or something like that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...