Jump to content

2/26 Coverage map update


clbowens

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, RAvirani said:

Not really. Two Clear to NV conversions in Seattle are now shown on the voice map, but that's all I've noticed. 

How many of the Clear sites are left to convert nationwide?

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, notsrealinc said:

I found this weird coverage map site from Sprint, I think it's a test site: https://coverageort.sprint.com/IMPACT.jsp?

The updated date updates every day. I can't tell of any changes though. 

Interesting...it says updated today although the map is relatively out of date.

Not sure what it's for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, RAvirani said:

Interesting...it says updated today although the map is relatively out of date.

Not sure what it's for. 

Perhaps a test for "Verified Coverage" like T-Mobile does?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, notsrealinc said:

I found this weird coverage map site from Sprint, I think it's a test site: https://coverageort.sprint.com/IMPACT.jsp?

The updated date updates every day. I can't tell of any changes though. 

Very interesting find! May I ask how you found it? Were you testing different URL's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, notsrealinc said:

I found this weird coverage map site from Sprint, I think it's a test site: https://coverageort.sprint.com/IMPACT.jsp?

The updated date updates every day. I can't tell of any changes though. 

 

7 minutes ago, RedSpark said:

Perhaps a test for "Verified Coverage" like T-Mobile does?

7dlb.png

Check out that Five Gee in the legend. This is something new for sure.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know they have been using M-MIMO equipment outside of launch market in some cases. I noticed that Peekskill NY shows 5G coverage. Technically its with in the NYC market but 5G launches have mostly been by city not the entire market. I have a feeling this site shows coverage for all M-MIMO equipment for when they push 5G software. If you look at Dallas and Dc there are also a few blotches of 5G coverage far from the city 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RedSpark said:

Very interesting find! May I ask how you found it? Were you testing different URL's?

Any url from the sprint.com domain with "ort" is a test site. Newer sites I don't think use ort anymore but many of them are internal meaning you need to be on their intranet. I guess a few of them slip through and this is one of them.

I simply used Google. https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asprint.com+"ort"&oq=site%3Asprint.com+"ort"

Edited by notsrealinc
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, notsrealinc said:

Any url from the sprint.com domain with "ort" is a test site. Newer sites I don't think use ort anymore but many of them are internal meaning you need to be on their intranet. I guess a few of them slip through and this is one of them.

I simply used Google. https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asprint.com+"ort"&oq=site%3Asprint.com+"ort"

Cool! Thanks for the info. Really nice find.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes Sprint's coverage map really frustrates me, as they severely understate coverage. I drove between Galesburg, IL and Moline, IL today and never dropped below -114 L800 although the coverage map indicates large roaming holes along the highway. They also don't give themselves enough credit going east form Galesburg on 74. I only dropped LTE once to 1x800 and it was for maybe 15 seconds, although the map indicates lots of roaming and "fair" voice coverage areas. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, RAvirani said:

The 5G map was pulled and I didn't have a chance to grab the tile URLs, unfortunately. Someone posted it on reddit and I think Sprint caught wind of it. 

As soon as I saw it on Reddit, I started counting down. Sprint patrols Reddit much more than this site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many of the Clear sites are left to convert nationwide?
I know of one in Minnesota in Woodbury MN off 94 by Woodbury lakes shopping center

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/26/2019 at 5:37 PM, bigsnake49 said:

How many of the Clear sites are left to convert nationwide?

There are a bunch in the Missouri Market that still needs to be converted. I've only found a few that have been converted but not many

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Same here, haven't had a single issue with RCS
    • Mapped two n41 small cell sin Jersey City today. They're the first two to be mapped there in Jersey City as far as I can tell and interestingly they're consecutive gNBs, possibly indicating they were installed around the same time. gNB 1088335 appears to be an upgrade of an older small cell. It looks identical to the T-Mobile n41 small cell I mapped earlier this year in Old Westbury.   I also mapped gNB 1088334 in Newport. This small cell appears to be a new build as I couldn't find any evidence of an older small cell in that area. Unfortunately no pic of it since I didn't even notice that I mapped it until I got home and I can't find it in Streetview.
    • Someone told me a couple years ago, that there were problems getting certain modems to aggregate overlapping spectrum even if the overlapping parts were actually blanked. So I think there might be firmware issues that need to be resolved first, which T-Mobile might not consider worth the effort for 4MHz at this time.
    • Tbh not that surprising. Every ISP seems to want to have an MVNO to pitch to their customers to make them stickier and maybe make some money in the process. And unlike USCC the MVNO should be able to cover TDS's entire wireline area, with infrastructure costs that are borne by someone else. Entertaining, yes. Surprising, not really...particularly when competing against Comcast or Spectrum, or even eventually T-Mobile fixed + mobile. This also strengthens my bet that they'll rebrand all their fixed wireless stuff as TDS, as that runs on spectrum they're keeping for now.
    • No? RCS on Google messages works great for me, messages between anyone with RCS enabled go through with no problems. Don't remember the last time I had an issue. I only have issues with people on iPhones on different carriers from T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...