Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Colorado Market (Denver/Colo Springs/Fort Collins/Pueblo/Grand Jct)


Craig

Recommended Posts

Yeah I'll probably just wait it out and see I was planning on upgrading to the next iphone hopefully it will support spark but hopefully they fix things these last two years have been miserable with really slow 3G speeds and a lot of dropped calls and what not, thanks for the replys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I'll probably just wait it out and see I was planning on upgrading to the next iphone hopefully it will support spark but hopefully they fix things these last two years have been miserable with really slow 3G speeds and a lot of dropped calls and what not, thanks for the replys

The dropped call issue should be correcting itself from north to south this month and over the next several weeks. The speeds... Well it'll take a bit more widespread LTE deployment to fix that. Also, as sites come online, speeds might not be what you'd expect. It'll take some time for the number of live sites to catch up to the number of users.

 

Hopefully the next iPhone will support Band 41. If not that, it will support Band 26 which is also going live in Denver. Band 26 brings better in building and distance coverage thanks to the lower frequency. The speeds are the same as those on Band 25, max of 37.5Mbps.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The dropped call issue should be correcting itself from north to south this month and over the next several weeks. The speeds... Well it'll take a bit more widespread LTE deployment to fix that. Also, as sites come online, speeds might not be what you'd expect. It'll take some time for the number of live sites to catch up to the number of users.

 

Hopefully the next iPhone will support Band 41. If not that, it will support Band 26 which is also going live in Denver. Band 26 brings better in building and distance coverage thanks to the lower frequency. The speeds are the same as those on Band 25, max of 37.5Mbps.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

I would like to see band 41 on the iPhone 6 and I do believe we will see it. Though I am still happy to have band 26 on the 5s, with, just as you said better building penetration.

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have a triband phone so cant speak from experience, but if the propagation and building penetration characteristics for band 41 LTE are similar to what they were with WiMax I wouldn't count on seeing a lot of it indoors. Wimax never made it to Louisville where I live, but at work in Denver it was really picky about where you stood in the building and how you held the phone. I assumed that was more about the band than Wimax itself.

 

Band 26 on the other hand should really help out. The 1x800 voice coverage really is starting to fill in the dead zones from 1900, Band 26 LTE should be able to do the same once it's rolled out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have a triband phone so cant speak from experience, but if the propagation and building penetration characteristics for band 41 LTE are similar to what they were with WiMax I wouldn't count on seeing a lot of it indoors. Wimax never made it to Louisville where I live, but at work in Denver it was really picky about where you stood in the building and how you held the phone. I assumed that was more about the band than Wimax itself.

 

Band 26 on the other hand should really help out. The 1x800 voice coverage really is starting to fill in the dead zones from 1900, Band 26 LTE should be able to do the same once it's rolled out.

 

Band 41 LTE is far better than WiMax. Plus, the new 8T8R antennas that are being deployed as part of NV 2.0 (likely showing up this summer in Denver) use beamforming to achieve propagation similar to PCS LTE. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Band 41 LTE is far better than WiMax. Plus, the new 8T8R antennas that are being deployed as part of NV 2.0 (likely showing up this summer in Denver) use beamforming to achieve propagation similar to PCS LTE

That's good info. I owned a Wimax phone for 2 years and probably got a useful wimax connection less than an 5 hours in two years. I'm way more excited about band 26. I'd be real happy with 10Mbps if it were consistent and reliable. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Greeley is live don't know about picture posting but 26665 1912.5mhz

 

Glad someone was able to confirm that. Couple of sites went live last week. Still more work to be done, but it's progress.

 

Do you have the Signal Check Pro app? If not, I'd recommend it. Take screenshots when you have a strong LTE signal and post :tu:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad someone was able to confirm that. Couple of sites went live last week. Still more work to be done, but it's progress.

 

 

 

Do you have the Signal Check Pro app? If not, I'd recommend it. Take screenshots when you have a strong LTE signal and post :tu:

 

Have the free one. One tower confirmed so far, right by my office and our repeater does carry it down to my basement office thankfully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about a 1x800 victory story. Everybody is commenting on sites along Hampden and into the tech center going live.....get along of this 1.21 gigawatt story of awesomeness.

 

I'm at the Los Dos Portrillos Mexican restaurant at Holly and County Line. Basically between Quebec and University on 470. That's a little ways away from Ulster in the tech center at 25 and 225. How many towers are closer than that.....anybody? Bueller.....a shitload. But here I am. Getting 1x800 in the restaurant from the tower on Ulster.

 

Son of a.........

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could someone with some inside knowledge answer a few questions?

1. What is the current status of csfb in Colorado?  Has it rolled out to the point that Spark phones are reliably getting a solid lock on LTE, or are they still mostly having to force LTE?

 

2. What is the projected (best guess) roll out of band 26 LTE? I'm seeing 1x800 voice at most locations now even though it isn't showing up on the maps at most locations, will band 26 LTE show up at the same time band 25 LTE shows up? When a site is NV accepted does it have all the hardware in place for band 26 LTE and it's just waiting for backhaul, or is there additional hardware to install?

 

I'm not asking for locations or specific towers, just general info here. Both of these questions will help me decide when to make the jump to a new phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could someone with some inside knowledge answer a few questions?

1. What is the current status of csfb in Colorado? Has it rolled out to the point that Spark phones are reliably getting a solid lock on LTE, or are they still mostly having to force LTE?

 

2. What is the projected (best guess) roll out of band 26 LTE? I'm seeing 1x800 voice at most locations now even though it isn't showing up on the maps at most locations, will band 26 LTE show up at the same time band 25 LTE shows up? When a site is NV accepted does it have all the hardware in place for band 26 LTE and it's just waiting for backhaul, or is there additional hardware to install?

 

I'm not asking for locations or specific towers, just general info here. Both of these questions will help me decide when to make the jump to a new phone.

1) Can't say for sure as I'm not there, but CSFB updates should be pushed to sites shortly after their cluster launch. Any places that has been cluster launched should be good to go.

 

2) Ongoing. Mostly Yes. Yes.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As fast as the data has gotten these past few weeks, it's the voice and text delivery that has really surprised me the most. Where as texts would lag to leave my phone a while back, they leave almost as soon as I hit send now. Very impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the first time getting LTE at work without forcing it. 16th mall and Lawrence. Speeds are abysmal but I'll take it as I know it'll only get better. 1.5 down 2.5 up on S5

Edited by kdw9988
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok Greeley results. 23rd Ave and 16th St. right next to a tower. And a ping under 3 minutes even. Still not optimal, plays havoc with some of my games.

post-33731-0-11905900-1401846158_thumb.png

post-33731-0-89607200-1401846204_thumb.png

Edited by DrOckW
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok Greeley results. 23rd Ave and 16th St. right next to a tower. And a ping under 3 minutes even. Still not optimal, plays havoc with some of my games.

 

Under 3 minutes? 116ms isn't that bad. Though it's usually under 100ms, that particular site may be fed by microwave. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...