Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Colorado Market (Denver/Colo Springs/Fort Collins/Pueblo/Grand Jct)


Craig

Recommended Posts

Roaming on Cricket 1xRTT and Sprint is showing 20+ hits for being out from foco to pueblo in the last few hours. Is this just an outage? Thoughts feelings opinions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roaming on Cricket 1xRTT and Sprint is showing 20+ hits for being out from foco to pueblo in the last few hours. Is this just an outage? Thoughts feelings opinions?

How were you able to see if your were roaming on cricket, and not Verizon ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How were you able to see if your were roaming on cricket, and not Verizon ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk

Signal Check app probably. It tells you who you are connected to.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah okay, so it's specific only to android. Makes sense.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk

I wouldn't think that's something that would be limited to one OS or another. The info should come from the site you're connected to, no kind of info needs to be pulled from the phone, which would then cripple the Apple version of the app. Maybe I'm misunderstanding how Signal Check determines the carrier you're connected to.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't think that's something that would be limited to one OS or another. The info should come from the site you're connected to, no kind of info needs to be pulled from the phone, which would then cripple the Apple version of the app. Maybe I'm misunderstanding how Signal Check determines the carrier you're connected to.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

It would be limited because is the OS. Signal check is not available in the iOS App Store. Sensorly is limited on iOS as well, due to the OS closing off certain API's needed. So that's why, if he was using signal check... It makes sense. While I prefer iOS, it has it's faults compared to android.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How were you able to see if your were roaming on cricket, and not Verizon ?

 

Signal Check Lite

Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't think that's something that would be limited to one OS or another. The info should come from the site you're connected to, no kind of info needs to be pulled from the phone, which would then cripple the Apple version of the app. Maybe I'm misunderstanding how Signal Check determines the carrier you're connected to.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

It would be limited because is the OS. Signal check is not available in the iOS App Store. Sensorly is limited on iOS as well, due to the OS closing off certain API's needed. So that's why, if he was using signal check... It makes sense. While I prefer iOS, it has it's faults compared to android.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk

 

Apple doesn't allow access to the information needed to determine what network you are on. Signal Check would not work at all on an iOS device. You can go into the engineering screen yourself and look at the numbers, but unless you have the network identifies memorized, there's no easy way to determine what network you are on.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My phone has been on 4g LTE at home in Aurora (Chambers and Mississippi) for the past 6 weeks or so, but the download speeds are still 3g-like, at around 0.3 mbps.  I'm disappointed at the moment.  I get on avg -120db reception for that band.  My question is, as more 4g sites come on line for Sprint, will my connection and dl speeds increase?  I thought the Denver metro area would all be up on 4g by now.  I did try my dl speeds at Parker and I-225 and got much better 4g speeds of 5-6 mbps.  Ive seen no change to my speeds on DU campus, and along the S Platte.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My phone has been on 4g LTE at home in Aurora (Chambers and Mississippi) for the past 6 weeks or so, but the download speeds are still 3g-like, at around 0.3 mbps.  I'm disappointed at the moment.  I get on avg -120db reception for that band.  My question is, as more 4g sites come on line for Sprint, will my connection and dl speeds increase?  I thought the Denver metro area would all be up on 4g by now.  I did try my dl speeds at Parker and I-225 and got much better 4g speeds of 5-6 mbps.  Ive seen no change to my speeds on DU campus, and along the S Platte.  

 

There's only one or two sites live in that area, they are handling many more users than they are designed to. That's what's pulling the speeds down. Once more sites go live, speeds will even out and become more usable. 

 

Also, if you upgrade to a tri-band (Spark) device, you'll have access to the Band 41 LTE network which is live across Denver and supports speeds of 30-70Mbps. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Impressive, all the way from I-70 and Golden rd.

Seems extremely far away.

On a separate note, I forced LTE at work and stayed on Band 41 almost all day downtown.  That is the first time I have been able to do that.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's only one or two sites live in that area, they are handling many more users than they are designed to. That's what's pulling the speeds down. Once more sites go live, speeds will even out and become more usable. 

 

Also, if you upgrade to a tri-band (Spark) device, you'll have access to the Band 41 LTE network which is live across Denver and supports speeds of 30-70Mbps. 

 

If you upgrade to a tri band spark device you will have to force 4 glte until all of our sites in Denver are 3 glte accepted. It's an easy thing to do. Just wanted you to know..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you upgrade to a tri band spark device you will have to force 4 glte until all of our sites in Denver are 3 glte accepted. It's an easy thing to do. Just wanted you to know..

What's 3 glte?   :frantic:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's 3 glte? :frantic:

Other than the awesome typo, I believe what Santa is trying to say is that in order for a Spark device (tri-band) to function correctly and take advantage of all available bands a few things have to happen:

 

-CSFB issues need to be resolved via software on towers in the area. This typically happens after a tower has been NV accepted. There's a great article on the wall from back in November about this.

 

-Band 41 or 26 have to also be available and live in the area otherwise only Band 25 LTE will be available to the handset assuming LTE services have launched.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If CSFB is all that's needed for B41 to connect, then how come in areas where CSFB and B25 have rolled out, my G2 still steadfastly refuses to connect to B41,despite it being enabled? The main place I notice this is off of Wads and US36- there's a B25 and CSFB site right next to an active B41 one that my Nexus 5 on the .17 radio had no problem connecting to while in LTE/CDMA mode, whereas the G2 just acts as if it isn't there, even when it scans B41 channels.

 

What's going on there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...