Jump to content

Google Nexus 5X by LG (codename "Bullhead")


PythonFanPA

Recommended Posts

They rarely get it wrong..

 

If that is the case then that is good news.  I might consider getting the Nexus 6P version now instead of the 5X.  The difference between a 32 GB Nexus 5X (probably $50 more) and a 32 GB Nexus 6P (rumored base model) will probably be about $50 - $70.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that is the case then that is good news.  I might consider getting the Nexus 6P version now instead of the 5X.  The difference between a 32 GB Nexus 5X (probably $50 more) and a 32 GB Nexus 6P (rumored base model) will probably be about $50 - $70.

Man, you guys got me really stumped now.  The whole reason I did not go the Moto X route was because of size, but the 6P looks like it may be the better device until next year.  Ughhh lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

$380 eh? Well I think I just decided that unless I win the Moto X Pure raffle here I will sit this one out and wait for a bunch of comparison reviews. My Nexus 5 is going strong except for the normal degraded battery and a randomly sticky power button.

 

I can wait a few weeks no problem.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh..I think the biggest downer from one of the rumors is that the Nexus devices will only be sold online and won't be available via carriers.  This sucks for those of us that are still on 2 year contracts and was looking to get it on the cheap.

 

http://www.androidpolice.com/2015/09/28/nexus-5x-and-6p-will-be-available-online-only-wont-be-sold-in-us-carrier-stores/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh..I think the biggest downer from one of the rumors is that the Nexus devices will only be sold online and won't be available via carriers.  This sucks for those of us that are still on 2 year contracts and was looking to get it on the cheap.

 

http://www.androidpolice.com/2015/09/28/nexus-5x-and-6p-will-be-available-online-only-wont-be-sold-in-us-carrier-stores/

 

I am still under two year contract but have paid full price for several unsubsidized and/or unlocked handsets during that span.  No big deal.  Just get over it, and suck it up.

 

And a $400 Nexus handset on subsidy would not be "on the cheap."  The subsidy would more than make up for the cost of the handset.  If it were priced at $200 or even $100 initial payment, that would add further insult to injury.  Only a fool or someone with a cash flow problem would go for that deal.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am still under two year contract but have paid full price for several unsubsidized and/or unlocked handsets during that span.  No big deal.  Just get over it, and suck it up.

 

And a $400 Nexus handset on subsidy would not be "on the cheap."  The subsidy would more than make up for the cost of the handset.  If it were priced at $200 or even $100 initial payment, that would add further insult to injury.  Only a fool or someone with a cash flow problem would go for that deal.

 

AJ

 

I probably wouldn't be getting the 5X but the 6P version.  Plus if Sprint sold the 64 GB and 128 GB versions it woudln't be just a $400 handset.  

 

Also when Sprint sold the Nexus 5 (2013) on contract the upgrade contract price I believe it was only $50 or $100 so add the typical $350 subsidy and you get about $400 which was about the Nexus 5 price.  Maybe Tim or anyone who bought the Nexus 5 (2013) on contract remembers the 2 year upgrade price but it certainly was NOT $199 for the 16 GB version at launch which would make the subsidy only $250.  If it was priced at $199 it would definitely not be worth the 2 year contract since the subsidy would be less.

 

I would have assumed that if Sprint sold the Nexus 5X 16GB version on contract that it woudln't be at the $199 price.  It would be the $50 to $100 price on 2 year contract price. Either way it doesn't really matter about being on a contract anymore because carriers now will pay ETFs if you decide to leave so there is no real penalty especially if you dont plan to switch carriers at all.  But if you do stay with the same carrier it only benefits you.

 

EDIT:  I guess the Nexus 5 was sold at a $199 price at launch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I probably wouldn't be getting the 5X but the 6P version. Plus if Sprint sold the 64 GB and 128 GB versions it woudln't be just a $400 handset.

 

Also when Sprint sold the Nexus 5 (2013) on contract the upgrade contract price I believe it was only $50 or $100 so add the typical $350 subsidy and you get about $400 which was about the Nexus 5 price. Maybe Tim or anyone who bought the Nexus 5 (2013) on contract remembers the 2 year upgrade price but it certainly was NOT $199 for the 16 GB version at launch which would make the subsidy only $250. If it was priced at $199 it would definitely not be worth the 2 year contract since the subsidy would be less.

 

I would have assumed that if Sprint sold the Nexus 5X 16GB version on contract that it woudln't be at the $199 price. It would be the $50 to $100 price on 2 year contract price. Either way it doesn't really matter about being on a contract anymore because carriers now will pay ETFs if you decide to leave so there is no real penalty especially if you dont plan to switch carriers at all. But if you do stay with the same carrier it only benefits you.

199.99 - 50 Amex gift card

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh..I think the biggest downer from one of the rumors is that the Nexus devices will only be sold online and won't be available via carriers. This sucks for those of us that are still on 2 year contracts and was looking to get it on the cheap.

 

http://www.androidpolice.com/2015/09/28/nexus-5x-and-6p-will-be-available-online-only-wont-be-sold-in-us-carrier-stores/

Couldn't possibly disagree more... BTW that's ok. (at least on this site)

Let's get every single person off of subsidies, get pricing to where it needs to be in 2015, and TRULY pay for the service you are using. Total separation of device manufacturers and service providers!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldn't possibly disagree more... BTW that's ok. (at least on this site)

Let's get every single person off of subsidies, get pricing to where it needs to be in 2015, and TRULY pay for the service you are using. Total separation of device manufacturers and service providers!

 

ericdabbs has a vested interest in maintaining contract subsidy.  He is on a sweetheart/sham SERO plan that includes subsidized upgrades -- all of which is a problem in its own right.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ericdabbs has a vested interest in maintaining contract subsidy.  He is on a sweetheart/sham SERO plan that includes subsidized upgrades -- all of which is a problem in its own right.

 

AJ

 

I'm also a SERO member, I'm right there with ericdabbs. It's super annoying to upgrade devices. Got hung up on twice when ordering the N6 because I didn't want TEP. I'll just add it next and use chat to remove it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also a SERO member, I'm right there with ericdabbs. It's super annoying to upgrade devices. Got hung up on twice when ordering the N6 because I didn't want TEP. I'll just add it next and use chat to remove it.

 

If you are still on SERO, do you have the right to complain about anything?  Did Russ say that it was okay to whine?

 

Or should you just thank your lucky stars that you are still getting such sweetheart/sham charity?  As another S4GRU staffer and I discussed, SERO plan users with subsidy are on welfare -- subsidized by Sprint and the rest of us.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint literally CANNOT afford to maintain SERO and subsidies at this stage. SERO users could be offered leases. I would be OK with that. Or migrate SERO to the new, still cheap plans. Or remaining subsidy plans that aren't SERO while Sprint still offers them. SERO is a major part of why I think Sprint should exit the subsidy business altogether.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint literally CANNOT afford to maintain SERO and subsidies at this stage. SERO users could be offered leases. I would be OK with that. Or migrate SERO to the new, still cheap plans. Or remaining subsidy plans that aren't SERO while Sprint still offers them. SERO is a major part of why I think Sprint should exit the subsidy business altogether.

Although I whole-heartedly agree, let's keep this thread on topic. There are a plethora of other threads in which we can discuss this issue.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint literally CANNOT afford to maintain SERO and subsidies at this stage. SERO users could be offered leases. I would be OK with that. Or migrate SERO to the new, still cheap plans. Or remaining subsidy plans that aren't SERO while Sprint still offers them. SERO is a major part of why I think Sprint should exit the subsidy business altogether.

 

SERO users can take advantage the Sprint Lease plan.  If you opt for the new cell phone to use Sprint Easy Pay or Sprint Lease options you can upgrade prior to 24 months.  I called and confirmed earlier this year when I was inquiring about upgrade eligibility when I thought about getting a GS6 back in June. 

 

Lets not even get into how Sprint literally cannot afford to maintain SERO because when i called earlier this year, they told me that they actually have a new $60 SERO plan (with unlimited minutes..probably to match the new single line Unlimited everything plan) which is different than the grandfathered $50 SERO (500 minutes).  Why they even made that new SERO plan if they really want to kick people out is beyond me which tells me that they aren't in a rush.  I agree with others in that lets move on about discussing the SERO topic because it is not relevant to this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...